this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
298 points (89.0% liked)

politics

17996 readers
4076 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly three in five Americans wrongly believe the US is in an economic recession, and the majority blame the Biden administration, according to a Harris poll conducted exclusively for the Guardian. The survey found persistent pessimism about the economy as election day draws closer.

The poll highlighted many misconceptions people have about the economy, including:

  • 55% believe the economy is shrinking, and 56% think the US is experiencing a recession, though the broadest measure of the economy, gross domestic product (GDP), has been growing.

  • 49% believe the S&P 500 stock market index is down for the year, though the index went up about 24% in 2023 and is up more than 12% this year.

  • 49% believe that unemployment is at a 50-year high, though the unemployment rate has been under 4%, a near 50-year low.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

While I'm not going to blame Biden for the economic situation right now since his policies look more like they've cushioned us against a much worse economic situation by pumping money into state-side manufacturing, I absolutely fucking HATE how out of touch economists are these days. They look at productivity (the value of which barely gets to workers), the stock market, or at spending that's driven by debt and rich people, and say "everything looks fine. Oh, most of you can't afford to eat, or get a job? Sounds like a personal problem."

If the conclusions that economists come to are so consistently out of touch with the experience of the average person, maybe they should fix their fucking outlook criteria!!

I think it was another post on here that had a bunch of [good] economists write a paper stating that if the inflation formula had accounted for borrowing costs like they USED TO, the inflation numbers would match much more closely with public sentiment, after having topped out at 18 fucking percent at the height in 21/22.

And of course there's how, at the height of the pandemic, they blantantly changed the criteria for what counts as a recession at all to say "no worries guys, everythings fine" when we were absolutely in a recession based on the old criteria.

Fuck economists

[–] givesomefucks 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It's metrics.

American culture has an absolutely horrible relationship with metrics.

For "the economy" the metrics are profits of corporations. Because back in the day that would generally translate to employee pay, number of employees, and how much money was changing hands.

But metrics should never be the final thing you look at, it's just an indicator.

Like, if your engine light isn't on but black smoke is pouring out from the engine...

It's probably best to look under the hood at what's actually happening.

But because our economy is based of wealthy investors, and they just care about the metrics, people game the metrics and come up with this rosey view of how things are.

Regular Americans don't care about the metrics that are being gamed. We're looking at the crazy person who's driving a car around that's obviously on fire. When they wave at us like everything is normal, it's not reassuring, it makes us think that person has no clue what's going on, and it's probably not a good idea to let them keep driving

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not just America. The whole world is addicted to a school of economics that "models" reality without ever actually studying it.

Most economists basically operate in a world of frictionless spherical cows moving in an infinite vacuum, and then from this try to infer useful data about the expected price of milk.

[–] Viking_Hippie 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most economists basically operate in a world of frictionless spherical cows moving in an infinite vacuum, and then from this try to infer useful data about the expected price of milk

😘👌

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the record, I'm pretty sure I'm paraphrasing Cory Doctorow here.

[–] Viking_Hippie 5 points 1 month ago

That just confirms that you're a person of impeccable taste and also honest about attribution 😁

[–] eltrain123 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Recession is coming. What we are seeing is how capitalism works. Businesses are squeezing as much profitability as they can out of existing products. The stories you see about record profits drive those actions. As long as they are making money, they push the strategy. The stories we are just starting to see about price cuts (like Target lowering grocery prices and the likes) are early indicators that corporate profits are peaking and adjustments need to be made to continue sales before revenue falls off a cliff.

People suffer when they get priced out of purchasing power. Businesses will suffer when they squeeze the market too hard, which is where we are. Unfortunately, people are going to suffer on that side, too, as businesses cut jobs to try to stem the bleeding.

We are in for a few fucked up years regardless of who gets elected in the next presidency. It takes a long time for real changes in the economy to show up. A lot of what we are dealing with is from the money flooded into the economy during Covid (under both Trump and Biden) and the swings in pricing due to loss of supply chain and the stickiness of pricing associated with its return.

[–] givesomefucks -1 points 1 month ago

like Target lowering grocery prices and the like

That's not them.lowering prices...

That's them launching a "value brand" they slap their name on.

It's priced low to capture market share. Why make $1 a unit you're selling when you can make $2 a unit because you're also the one who makes it?

[–] Xraygoggles 3 points 1 month ago

Spot on, this is also referred to as Goodhart's Law.

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 1 points 2 weeks ago

this exactly describes the truth of what is going on

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

if the inflation formula had accounted for borrowing costs like they USED TO, the inflation numbers would match much more closely with public sentiment

It is a total mystery why they removed it!

[–] Viking_Hippie 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last year, they actually put out a report stating that inflation was back to normal "when you discount the costs of groceries, power, housing and fuel" 🤦

You know, just minor luxury items that everyone can choose to forgo if they want to!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is a great little misleading factoid -- the missing piece being that inflation is also back to normal if you do include the cost of groceries, power, housing, and fuel.

The fact that they're excluded from the usual metric isn't some weird economic misleading-metric plot (although, those certainly exist). It's just that the CPI usually excludes those items because their prices can swing around in ways that are different from the ways that the baseline price of everything else swings around. But, if you include them in the analysis of what's happened since 2020, the answer doesn't change at all.

[–] Viking_Hippie 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you're saying that groceries, power, and housing are NOT more expensive now than in 2020? Is that seriously what you're trying to make people believe??

the CPI usually excludes those items because their prices can swing around in ways that are different from the ways that the baseline price of everything else swings around.

The most basic things that everyone needs, the things that especially the working poor spend the vast majority of all income isn't itself the baseline for the CONSUMER price index?

That's as fucking useless to gauge how regular people are doing as measuring the overall economy by GDP and stock prices, then! 🤦

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

So you're saying that groceries, power, and housing are NOT more expensive now than in 2020? Is that seriously what you're trying to make people believe??

I am saying that their prices have gone up pretty much by the same amount as the general CPI, including a huge spike upwards in 2022, which means that looking at the CPI without them is exactly the same (in this particular case) as looking at the CPI with them.

Stop. Read again.

I am saying that their prices have gone up pretty much by the same amount as the general CPI, including a huge spike upwards in 2022, which means that looking at the CPI without them is exactly the same (in this particular case) as looking at the CPI with them.

Makes sense, right? Or no? I'm happy to talk in a little more detail if you want.

Here are the numbers. It's complex, obviously, and some commodities will spike way, way up, or drop below 0% inflation and stay negative for a while. But it actually happens that if you average it all out, CPI with everything is right now more or less the same as CPI with the normal stuff excluded. Good things to highlight to see it are "All Items" or "Less Food and Energy" or "Shelter". Between those three, it'll give you a pretty good picture, and they all behave pretty much the same - a big hump after Covid from supply-chain shock and corporate greed, i.e. the situation Biden came in with, and then reducing steadily back down as Biden's policies got ahold of it.

Makes sense? Or no? Like I say, I'm happy to talk about the details.

[–] unreasonabro 7 points 1 month ago

i mean it's not like they can tell the truth about what they're doing, they'd go to jail

[–] AA5B 6 points 1 month ago

Looks like too many of you are renting, not owning your home, so they track that instead

Is this another “avocado toast” moment?