secretlyaddictedtolinux

joined 7 months ago
[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 2 points 32 minutes ago

So, the real elephant in the room is that for the average worker, they are more productive (ie, working much harder) and under much, much more financial stress... which effects epigenetics

and... people are having children later in life, leading to children with more genetic defects (the average person has about 7 genetic defects, some people have more, some fewer)

in the 1950s, a man could work at a factory with a high school diploma, own a house, support a family, and have a wife as a full-time assistant at home

now both parents have to work, if there even are children, there may or may not be a house, and many are just single. people are under huge amounts of stress, and all of it effects epigenetics including via weaker bonds within families

bodies interpret stress as either "uh oh, i'm going to get kicked out of my tribe and will have to forage and hunt on my own and may die" or "there may be a famine soon"

the fact that the vitamin levels of food has gone down is a real thing, bodies remember things like that, and can be aware of the decrease, and start to prepare for famines

TLDR captialism without proper government regulation of externalities is making people fat along with higher populations and decreased vitamin levels in food due to over-farming

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 1 points 40 minutes ago

brutal but accurate

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 70 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It's funny that the CEO of this company was killed because UnitedHealth are a bunch of lying assholes who deceive people with promises of coverage, then don't deliver, and they angered the wrong dude...

and now in response UnitedHealth are broadening their deceit with fradulent DMCA takedown notices.

They think more deception is the answer, because they don't know anything else.

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 6 points 4 days ago

Someone should contact the judge who approved the class action settlement and let him or her know Equifax is putting up barriers to collect the settlement and the company should be held in contempt, with consumers allowed to opt out of the class and sue individually to collect.

Many victims of Equifax's cheap and negligent security practices resulting in a huge data breach already are giving up on getting paid and will likely not go back.

Problems with consumers getting this small amount owed as class members or onorous data collection requirement amounts from a company shown to be terrible with cybersecurity should result in severe consequences or else it shows the judge doesn't actually care about the class members and is doing a bad job protecting them. Of course, that's only if the judge becomes aware of the problem.

 

Serving on juries is an important patriotic duty for Americans

Unfortunately, many times only pro-cop and pro-establishment types less likely to nullify make it to juries.

What is likely to get a person eliminated from a jury pool?

  1. #Nullification on your X account

  2. Admitting to knowing people who have been arrested or seeming any way connected to party culture, drug culture, or liberalism

  3. Seeming hostile to law enforcement in any way, such as stating "Yes I have been to a protest"

  4. Admitting to having family who has been arrested. (Do you know for sure they were arrested? If you aren't sure, do you need to admit it?).

  5. Seeming too interested to be on the jury. Are you a little too excited about this? Or is it something that while inconvenient is important to do? Or perhaps something that is something you could do, and you'd be fair, but you don't really want to because it would be difficult? If you are yoo eager, or too willing, they will ask why.

-"Please pick me! I promise not to nullify!" will not make it onto a jury

  1. Your clothing and manner of speech matters. "Like no way would I be unfair, like l... yeah... I'd be cool wif it" = liberal = eliminated. "I would try to be fair and sensible" = trying too hard. "I would be fair" = not eliminated. Don't use that exact phrase, find something short and do not convey anything with enthusiasm. Conservatives don't have a lot of emotion. Wearing anything baggy? Smelling just a little bit like reefer? Visible tattoos or noserings? Goodbye being on the jury.

  2. Too much knowledge of the case. You can't be clearly lying either. "What horrible greedy CEO making old people miserable that got shot? Someone got shot? I dont use the Interwebs or know anything about how they used AI to deny claims" = fail, gone from the jury pool. "I've been watching it and following every update online" = gone. "I don't think so" = equivocating sounds like bullshit and gone. "I heard someone got shot and there was an arrest." = not eliminated

  3. Don't answer with "Yeah, probably" or hedge your words if you are trying to get onto a jury. The DA will sense the lie and you're out. DAs are great at sensing liars.

  4. In certain contexts, having views that could make you biased. "Yes, my grandparents were denied their claims and it made me furious. I hate those insurance companies so much" = gone from the pool. "Insurance companies deny claims? Really?" = obvious liar and gone from jury pool.

  5. Blatantly lying in an obvious way = gone from jury pool. "No I've never been arrested" and the DA knows you had a drunk in public arrest 8 years ago in that very jurisdiction.

If you are selected and get to the jury room and say "We should nullify" a judge can remove you. They can't remove you for honest doubt. "Yes, it's suspicious and they look similar, but I don't believe he looks the same. Lots of people have large sexy black eyebrows and have smiles like that" is not grounds to remove you without creating an easy appeal, especially if you seem open to what the other jurors say but constantly vote to aquit. They can't remove you for suspecting you of trying to nullify if you aren't calling it that.

Is jury nullification a civic duty? Remember, the Boston Tea Party was illegal, the Declaration of Independence was illegal... Many things now viewed as fair were once viewed as bad. Being sexy and taking a stand against a corrupt system and being named after a video game character is not a crime.

This are hypothetical examples of what can get you kicked off a jury or removed from a jury pool. It's important to follow all laws and always tell the truth, including in court, and this post is for discussion purposes and satirical purposes only. You should always be honest, even if the results will continue to plunge the world into a further abyss of exploitation and misery, because honesty is virtuous and we need to follow the rules.

 

First, no support for Graphene OS...

Second, snitching on an American hero for thirty pieaces of silver...

"I'm snitchin' it"™

and

"Would you like some snitch fries with that?"™

or

"Try out new McSnitch sandwich!"™

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This post really rings true. This is the small rumbling before the big quake.

The reason everyone is offering condolences and claiming this is bad is because the government is supposed to have a monopoly on violence, and that offers protection to the elite in society. Even on radical left lemmy, you can be banned for implying this is a good thing.

This person was at the top of a pyramid that lied to and deceived millions of people and made life absolute hell for people undergoing medical problems. He was responsible for that misery. He created hell on earth for those people. He was not that different than a mass-murderer, knowing full well what his policies would do, only his actions were legal.

His company delayed, denied, and defended, and the assailant had an answer to deny and an answer to defend but there was no delay, just a quick deposing of this guy. It was obviously symbolic.

It's funny because the founding fathers of the US had enough of the bullshit from England and so they decided to rebel and used violence to create a New Republic... but their violence made them patriots and heroes. It's just interesting... I haven't seen 1 person call the assailant a hero yet. It's not like the Founding Fathers of the US used rhetoric and voting to persuade England to stop its brutality.

I bet a lot of people are secretly thinking that assailant is a hero. (In accordance with lemmy's policies, I am not saying he is a hero and instead am saying the assailant is very bad and violence is always bad.)

But we're in such gilded-age end-times right now that the corporate media always parrot the idea that violence is always bad... (with the implied part being the government, backing the elite oligarchy, is the exception) and the populace has internalized that thinking out of fear.

We have democracy in this country and should vote in leaders that actually make legislation that is sensible, but it's impossible because the bottom 40 percent of society are brain-washed by religious delusions that the elite thrust upon them in order to make them easier to control. The problems in society are caused by religion and it's just impossible to make the stupidest bottom 40 percent of people stop believing in bullshit.

The elite have given people a choice: gun rights and policies for the rich... or no guns and policies for the poor. There is no middle class pro-gun party and it's by design. We need to have liberals start embracing the NRA because any gun regulation seems toxic to middle America, and for good reason. To anyone who say the Democrats are not an anti-gun party, you're lying and everyone can see through it. Any gun regulation is a slow decent to zero guns for regular people, and working class middle America knows it, which is part of why we keep ending up with these horrible leaders allowing health care in the US to descend into an abyss.

 

I have no data on this.

So many people put their laptop right on their stomach while using it.

When I measure the energy coming off of my laptop, the different types of electrical energy, it's somewhat high. I almost always put it on a pillow before putting it on my stomach. I know many devices are FCC approved, but I don't know if the FCC takes hours of use on a stomach into account.

Have researchers ruled out this as a possible cause of the increased rate of colorectal cancers?

(Also is the flouride in my water making me see conspiracies that don't really exist?)

I've just been wondering about this recently and there are so many smart people on lemmy I figured someone here would have a smart opinion on this. I know the prevailing theory is colorectal cancers are possibly due to more ultra-processed foods, but has anyone thought about laptops? Is this illogical as a possible cause? It may be that the energy levels aren't high enough to be a cause or that the colon is too far away from a laptop on a stomach to impact anything.

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 2 points 3 weeks ago

Me months ago: "the NRA matters and feminism matters and the solution is making sure women have more and larger guns and better tactical training."

Everyone back then was like "no guns are bad!" and now suddenly, look who is seeing the light.

Trans people should not be armed. Trans people should be given vouchers to buy large amounts of weapons so they can be HEAVILY armed and also should be given subsidized weapons training by the government.

When I meet a trans women, I want to admire her dress and know she has excellent tactical training.

We need to stop seeing gun rights as a left or right issue and appreciate the fact that guns are anti-tyranny. The left's constant anti-stance alienates a huge number of working class people as well. The problem with any sort of "reasonable restrictions" is the government always wants more, more regulation, more rules, and little by little it gets harder for the average guy or gal or intersex person. Liberals need to stop alienating middle America with this anti-gun stuff so we can protect trans people.

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 14 points 1 month ago
[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've missed extremely discounted sales for services I like and have been frustrated about it before. It seems fine for protonvpn to do this just once but the should also just add a toggle.

 

I am considering hosting something and am concerned about DDOS attacks.

I am morally opposed to cloudflare because I think they are an unethical and shitty company.

What privacy focused solutions are there to reduce the likelihood of a successful DDOS attack?

 

Reddit is blocking vpns and invites users to create a ticket if they think there's been an error. I almost created a ticket with email address [email protected] saying i wasn't sure if I was using a VPN with the body text just being "fuckyouspez!!!!" over and over. I didn't submit it because I thought for a moment "would this be illegal to submit?" It probably isn't, but I am not sure.

 

i vary my IP randomly to try to be tracked less on the internet by ad companies.

when using duckduckgo, i notice my results of certain searches seem slightly correlated to the IP I use if there's anything that could be impacted by location.

this is also not just country specific, where duckduckgo is narrowing this down based on country

i am not sure if duckduckgo is passing on the IP or if somehow bing has partnered with data centers or ISPs to try to guess the IPs going into duckduckgo.

I also may be sensing this correlation and it's just random and not there. i could be wrong.

Does anyone else ever notice this or wonder about this?

 

from Dogsbody album

view more: next ›