this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
757 points (97.4% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5765 readers
860 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 108 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ah yes, the Panasonic Discman, the prime successor to the Phillips Walkman.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Glad I'm not the only one who got a twitchy eye reading that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I thought to myself for the briefest of moments: Am I being Mandela Effect’d?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I am really confused now. I know Discman is Sony's name, but generally people refer to any such portable CD player as "discman". At least where I live.
And it's not just regular people, even shops refer to them as dicmans.
Here are some examples to back my claims:

exampleshttps://www.alza.sk/discmany/18886534.htm
https://aukro.sk/discmany
https://www.mall.sk/discmany
https://discmany.heureka.sk/
https://www.okay.sk/collections/discmany

The only exception seems to be Nay, referring to this category as "Portable CD players".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

That’s very interesting! Around me, we called them CD Players, it must be a regional thing. Many people called the portable cassette player a Walkman, even though that was a lineup of products from Sony.

Looking on US Amazon, there are several players that have Discman, Walkman, or both in the titles. Sony must not be enforcing their trademarks (wrong term?) for the first non-sponsored listing being called:

2000mAh Rechargeable Discman CD Player:Walkman CD Player…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Yepp, we all called them Discman back in the day regardless of the brand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

At least it's not a sony ipod

[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Wasn't the actual "Discman" a Sony product? In the same line as their Walkman cassette players, but for CDs?

I had a Walkman back in the day; but never an official Discman player. All my CD players were pieces of shit 😩

[–] Ottomateeverything 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes. The pictured item is a portable cd player, not a Discman.

Apparently SL-SK420 or whatever that says didn't have the same ring to it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is an interesting phenomenon called a proprietary eponym, where a brand name becomes synonymous with a product.

Just like walkman and disc man, in my language we call a car satnav a "TomTom" after the brand that popularised it here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Here is the scene from the Clerks cartoon about adhesive strips.

https://youtu.be/wD6ZW05R9kY?si=G7DxsQtQf1iQ82mh

[–] espentan 4 points 11 months ago

Yeap, Discman was the name used by Sony up until around the year 2000, when they changed it to "CD Walkman".

[–] [email protected] 53 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This thing is so recent it could play MP3s... The first Discman was released in 1984. I'm actually really confused why they picked such a recent version, the technology was almost phased out when this thing was released. FFS the original iPod came out a year before this thing...

[–] Jubei_K_08 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably because they couldn't purchase the other ones at reasonable prices anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Here is one for $44. https://www.ebay.com/itm/256220081101

Surely a museum can afford that? Right?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Is this your kid nephew's "museum"?

"Old" is not 20 years and that is not a goddamn discman. Sorry, Ralphie. You can do better.

[–] jpeps 9 points 11 months ago

I think you're missing the point. Museums collect this stuff not because it's old, but because it was significant to people at the time and they want to collect it for prosperity. Imagine if they waited until 2050 and then said "Shit! Wasn't there a cd player we all liked at some point? Does anyone have one?" They should have one, they're a museum! Many museums will be maintaining an iPhone collection for example.

Regardless, most people under 30 likely do not have access to a cd player, and I'd guess many never owned one. It's not strange for that to be in a museum even without what I've said above.

[–] danielbln 8 points 11 months ago

Sorry to be the one breaking the bad news, but you might be old yourself if you think like that. Don't sweat it, happens to all of us.

[–] elbarto777 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I disagree with you. In the tech industry, 20 years is ancient. If you were born in 1985, 20 years prior that was 1965, and the tech of that decade was very different from the 80s tech.

Imagine someone living in a year where calculator watches were already a thing, and when in a museum displaying one of those radios in wooden cabinets and knobs with the style of the time they said "that's not old!!!!!!"

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Man that one can play mp3 discs. That has to be newer than 2002. Burning CDs wasn't super common yet.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I had a aftermarket head unit that played mp3 cds in 2002.

I had a mp3 player in 1999.

We were definitely burning cds back then, this woulda come at a premium but the tech was there.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember downloading mp3s from usenet in 1999 on my Windows 95 computer. I'd start the download, go to work, then retrieve the file when I got home.

I felt so fancy buying a CD burner at Best Buy so I could burn them onto CDs. It was the first PC component I ever installed by myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My brother had an mp3 player in 1999. I think it had 16MB of storage space. I didn't see the point of it when you could only put like 5 songs on the thing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I could fit roughly 1 hour of music on mine, longer if I dropped the bitrate to 96kbps instead of 128.

The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast, no moving parts so it never skipped. This seemed super cool to me because I skateboarded and stuff and generally liked the idea of no skips.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I had that very device right about 2002. Put my whole CD collection on a few mp3 disks. Replaced it a few years later with a 6GB mp3 player.

[–] caesar_salad83 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Me too! I think it was around 2007 that i got an iRiver H10. My only other standalone music player I ever bought with my own money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RadButNotAChad 7 points 11 months ago

Sure it was, in America at least. I think I got my first PC that could burn disks in like 1998 and it was a mass marketed Compaq from Circuit City. Napster showed up the next year and CD burning exploded. Napster was dead by 2001.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Does it belong in a museum if the essential same device is still sold? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07MDY28Q1/ I mean sure you can get a 200 year old coffee grinder… but that's 200 years not 22.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even bicycles are still sold =:-)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I bought one today, I'd spend the extra $10 for a rechargeable unit. The one bad memory I have of these was having to replace the batteries so frequently.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (11 children)

You can use rechargeable batteries in it... Built in rechargeable batteries suck. The entire lifespan of the device is tied to that battery. Give me something that runs on AAs any day.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Whoa...they have a USB-C rechargeable one.

You know, if they sold an audiophile one, with clean electronics, a good built in amp, and the ability to play FLAC files (microSD port), I'd buy one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Check carefully. That might exist.

[–] mob 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Museum ≠ old.

I'm sure there are mp3 players in museums as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Colorado Railroad Museum has railroad crossing signals donated by BNSF that are only a few years old. Museums will gladly accept both old and new.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't Discman a Sony brand?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Correct. This isn't labeled correctly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Kinda off-topic, but I honestly miss the in-line remotes high-end Discman & portable Minidisc players used to have..

Really wish they would make a come-back in some way, maybe as a supplemental Bluetooth device?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Laughs/Cries in cassette based Walkman.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Hold onto that. The cassette mechanisms that are produced now are absolute trash. There's literally no manufacturer on earth who makes a good one anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 8 points 11 months ago

I had that exact model. Only CD player I ever bought new, portable or otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I still have working cassette player!

[–] synapse1278 7 points 11 months ago

I had the exact same model !

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Couldn't they have picked one from the 90s at least

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I mean it was over twenty one years ago. Technology ages fast. You can also say it had historical significance so it can end up in a museum earlier than you might expect.

[–] krakenx 5 points 11 months ago

That was legit the best MP3 CD player. It never skips no matter how much you shake it and it builds a different, but consistent shuffle playlist depending on what song was playing when you hit shuffle.

[–] Konstant 4 points 11 months ago

I've seen consoles like the Sega Genesis and the Master System in a temporary exposition and end up taking photos since I haven't seen one for so long lmao

[–] hperrin 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I had that exact model. And I was cool, wearing my over the ear headphones.

[–] RoseRose56 4 points 11 months ago

I like the design, I got a Sony CD Walkman last month, and I love it.

[–] TheEighthDoctor 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the worst part is that I had the exact same model.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›