this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
792 points (89.4% liked)

Political Memes

5601 readers
2503 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is extremely vague with zero context.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Right? There's a lot to criticize the US government for, but I'm pretty sure that this is already how things work. No idea what OP is on about

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can't I use explosives to fish?

Why is it illegal to spray people with gasoline?

If my company wants to dump toxins into the daycare, they should. There's no laws for it.

[–] Touching_Grass 26 points 1 year ago

This has "park in handicap parking without stickers" energy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] niktemadur 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This also works as a corporate excuse to do whatever the hell they want to a community and the environment.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

This is the huge problem with the optics of Libertarianism as a whole. Thats why Liberal Progressive is a more common term because the right wing co-opts libertarian arguments in a pro-corporate way.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DAMNIT THIS IS MERIKA I SHOULD HAVE A MISSILE LAUNCHER ON THE FRONT YARD BEN WASHINGTON WROTE IT IN THE CONSTITUTION

[–] AngryCommieKender 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't forget James Hancock, Thomas Madison, and John Jefferson!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Dude, I’m pretty sure it’s Steve Madison.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

founding randos

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Laws against victimless crimes come to mind.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Wogi 77 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Justification is easy. Damn near no one does anything they don't feel is justified. You may not agree with it, but that doesn't really matter, because the right people will.

A lot of the most evil shit in history was done by people who felt completely justified in doing it.

Justification is a stupidly low bar.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (10 children)

You're missing the point. We don't need to justify to the government why we need to do anything. The government needs to justify to us why it should be prohibited. Feeling justified in your own actions doesn't come into it.

As for "the most evil shit in history", it should be extremely easy for the government to justify prohibiting it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Seaguy05 45 points 1 year ago

US Govt: Y'all shoot a lot of people. Let's slow this down a bit. Some people: how about I shoot you!?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Take cannabis for instance. They've 'justified' why it has been illegal, it's just all the reasons were manipulated science and moral bullshit.

[–] yesman 30 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Normal people have their behavior regulated by family, partners, and work. It's only the ownership class and psychopaths who worry about being reined in by the government. Libertarians have spiders in their brains.

[–] Bgugi 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Miscegny, abortion, sodomy, war on drugs...

There's plenty of things the government has (and it's trying to have) blocked that "normal" people should worry about

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Have you ever noticed the people who don't want lead in the gasoline are not the same people who are trying to ban abortion?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Regulations on business and production of resources don't infringe on my personal liberties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey this is the "I have nothing to hide" argument for privacy. I think wanting people to have freedom from suspicion by the government is based. You're not gonna find me agreeing with any right wing "libertarian" positions like low taxes. My libertarianism is more about... Policing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree. I've been listening to behind the bastards a lot, and the host is basically a pretty radical dude in favor of maximizing personal and civic freedoms and social safety nets.

At this point I feel like we should be called the neo-libroanarchists or something. It seems like every political faction in the US is trying to restrict something just because.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] masquenox 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s only the ownership class and psychopaths who worry about being reined in by the government.

I guess you forgot the badge-wearing fascists with itchy trigger fingers stalking your neck of the woods with the express purpose of visiting violence upon you if you step out of line.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (10 children)

You can't go running around with feces all over your body and hug strangers, OP, it's not hygienic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boom. Justification. OP's request is satisfied.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is deep. I'm 14 though fyi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices 23 points 1 year ago

The government does justify its prohibitions.

They're just sometimes good justifications (like protecting drinking water supplies) or shitty justifications (like staying in power with Gerrymandering).

Sometimes it's even as weak as "putting forward laws Senator John looks like he's doing something (so he can stay visible and get reelected. Not about power, but just keeping a cushy job)"

But there's always a justification.

This is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't it inherently cringe to claim your own things based?

[–] littlebluespark 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think this is OC? You must be new here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bigFab 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)
[–] Happybara 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Tolerance is just an extension of the social contract. Intolerant people are actively violating the social contract and, as such, are not eligible for the benefits such a contract provides. This has been settled law for millennia. Live and let live... or else.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Meh, I'm not a Nazi so no offense taken.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I will do all that I can to crumple a world where "if it is not required it is forbidden" exists; this I swear to you all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Uhhhh... isnt this how it already works?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uid0gid0 7 points 1 year ago

See also: the ninth amendment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Justifications are easy, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›