this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
233 points (97.2% liked)

News

23306 readers
4948 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

State records show that a suspended Alabama priest recently married the 18-year-old woman he fled to Italy with this summer, and an archbishop said Wednesday that he expects the Vatican to pursue the man’s official dismissal from the priesthood.

A marriage certificate filed Monday in Mobile County shows that Alex Crow, a 30-year-old Catholic priest in south Alabama, married the 18-year-old. Crow left the country in late July with the teen who is a recent graduate of McGill-Toolen High School. Crow was not an employee at the school but sometimes visited theology classes there, news outlets reported. The marriage certificate indicates the woman turned 18 in June.

Archbishop Thomas J. Rodi announced in July that he had suspended Crow and forbidden him from acting, dressing, or presenting himself as a priest. Rodi later said he saw no way for Crow to return to the priesthood.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ha, yeah, no grooming going on under the guise of theology education here folks... no sir. move along

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And yet I think it's more the 'marriage' part the Church cares more about. They DGAF about priests raping altar boys but as soon as one gets married that's when the real punishments kick in.

Shows you where their priorities are.

[–] Cruxifux 33 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So let me get this straight. Get caught fucking a ten year old boy = church covers it up and you keep your priesthood. Marry an adult woman = lose your priesthood? What?

[–] Mamertine 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes,

Though I will point out that adult woman was likely being groomed while she was a child.

[–] Cruxifux 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah probably. But my point is the church doesn’t generally care about that part.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

She turned 18 in June, and they left to Italy together in July.

You think he met her the same month she turned 18 and then they fell madly in love and fled the country a month later?

Or is it more likely he had been manipulating and grooming a child at the school he used to visit as a priest?

[–] Cruxifux 11 points 11 months ago

Yes but I don’t think that’s why the church is removing his priesthood. I don’t think they’re allowed to get married.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They didn't get caught.. they confessed and you can't act on a confession..

Though the rule is being changed to fix this loophole

[–] Cruxifux 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That’s a bullshit rule that the church is using to supersede the law and enables child abuse. Everyone who knows and helps cover it up is complicit and it should be conspiracy to commit child abuse at the very least.

Religious dogma should NEVER be above the law.

[–] modeler 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Catholic church is self-governed by Canon Law - its own law that's been around since the collapse of the Roman Empire. For a good portion of this time, Canon Law superseded national laws that applied to people who weren't priests. I think the church still privately believes that only Canon Law matters, and they can basically ignore everyone else. That's why they have protected child abusers, rapists and all other kinds of shit their medieval claptrap says isn't important. They are a bunch of arrogant pricks who believe themselves better than, you know, people who don't abuse those with less power.

[–] Cruxifux 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, exactly. This guy gets it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which is why the rule is being abandoned

[–] Cruxifux 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dude, I think it’s a little fucking late to get credit for abandoning this rule, which they have yet to actually even abandon and is probably being used to protect pedophiles AS WE SPEAK.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Naw, Pope Francis is cracking down

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

The mistake was getting married.

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Wait... so priests can get married and they only stop being priests if you take it up directly with the Vatican?

[–] GONADS125 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's not like the Catholic church exactly condones pedophilia and rampant sexual abuse, but look how extensively it permeates the institution.

When wondering "Would the Catholic church really do X?" I find the best practice is to instead ask myself: "Does the pope shit in the woods?"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I prefer the alternative "does the Pope's dick fit in a donut?"

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that highly depend on the diameter of the donut hole?

[–] FuglyDuck 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It’s hard to make a donuts too small.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 11 months ago

There used to be a place here that sold you four tiny "gourmet" donuts for way too much money. Unsurprisingly, it lasted about a month and a half. I think even the smallest dick could fit through those donut holes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I don’t know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

My personal favorite is, "does the Pope shit in his hat?"

[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug 6 points 11 months ago

It's a bureaucracy

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain 4 points 11 months ago

It's not like the catholic church is full of the virtue they espouse

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So the church is mad that he's still with her after she turned 18? Because we don;t see this kind of hubbub when its small children.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

The church is mad that they made it official and got married. And yes the church is fucked

[–] TheBat 5 points 11 months ago

defrocked

"They can't help themselves, can they?"

- Jimmy Carr

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago

he should be raped and murdered in prison.