this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
358 points (99.2% liked)

News

23267 readers
3199 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bayer’s Monsanto was ordered to pay more than $1.5 billion Friday over claims its patented weed-killer, Roundup, was linked to users’ cancer, Bloomberg reported.

James Draeger, Valerie Gunther and Dan Anderson were each awarded a total of $61.1 million in actual damages and $500 million each in punitive damages by jurors in state court in Jefferson City, Missouri.

The three people alleged that their non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas — a type of cancer that begins in your lymphatic system, part of the body’s immune system — were caused by years of using Roundup while gardening.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennybird 61 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I'll never forget the weird fucking sub of literal Monsanto apologists on reddit who'd keyword search for anything negative and descend with gish-gallop and brigading.

Bunch of weirdos, some of whom openly admitted to working for and depending on Bayer/Monsanto for a living.

[–] JustZ 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They'll be here if we start popping up in Google searches. I always assumed they were paid professionals, working entry-level jobs for reputation management consultants.

[–] extant 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

More than likely it's a bot farm hired by a public relations firm. Bot farms create bots every day and then assign them tasks to repost popular content and then reply using popular comments under different bots all so they can build up credibility and look like a real user. So then when they are put to a task you can have a single user welding the influence of hundreds or thousands to control the narrative.

Reddit is famously saturated in those bots and this place is likely no different but on a smaller scale made even easier by the instance system.

[–] lennybird 3 points 11 months ago

It was proven in court docs if I recall that they did have a troll farm not unlike the Russian IRA with the sole purpose of defending Monsanto's products with vigor. The only type of person who would engage in that degree of fundamentalist day in and day out is either an AI bot or on a payroll to do exactly that.

[–] PanaX 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a mod on a few garden and science subs at that time, they were pernacious and ethically inept. They would associate anything anti-pesticide or GMO with being an anti science quack. And they would dog pile on poor individuals expressing concern.

I had several debates with them, often reported them for brigading, and ultimately had to ban them.

[–] aidan 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Being anti-GMO is almost always anti-science quack. (Except if your complaint is about the patenting of the DNA) Pesticides are a bit more complicated because they are necessary for modern agriculture, but of course making a poison that only kills the things you want to kill has the risk if them killing more things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Being blanket pro GMO is kinda nuts and can only come from a kneejerk against anti-science nuts.

There are some great GMO examples but also a lot of really bad ones, do you realise that the vast majority of GMO seeds have been modified not to use less pesticide but to make the crops resilient to the pesticides and allow them to use more? It allows them to absolutely flood the area with Monsanto products that all wash into the waterways and destroy ecosystems - and they don't care because if people are forced to farm dead wasteland they'll need loads of the chemical fertilisers they also sell....

Capitalism had a whole load of choices for how to use these new technologies, they could have chosen to help the environment, but the other option is fuck everyone and grab the money so of course they took that.

[–] broadacre_farmer 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bunch of weirdos, some of whom openly admitted to working for and depending on Bayer/Monsanto for a living.

Society relies on products they've developed, the world would be a very different place without gramoxone, 2,4-D and glyphosate. Considering glyphosate is the safest of the widely used herbicides it's probably not a great thing to brand everyone who is against banning it a shill.

[–] grue 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So, when's the EPA finally going to ban it?

[–] captainlezbian 19 points 11 months ago

When we stop restricting them from doing anything to protect the environment

[–] JJROKCZ 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully soon, at least force them to reformulate without the extreme cancer chemicals.

[–] JustZ 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They can't. The cancer causing chemical (NNG) isn't something they added, it's inherent to producing glyphosate.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-Nitrosoglyphosate

[–] JJROKCZ 1 points 11 months ago

Well that’s unfortunate

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

~~$1.5b is barely a slap on the wrists, but hopefully the first in an avalanche of lawsuits for them. This is like one fiscal quarter's revenue for RoundUp, but hopefully the signal of the beginning of the end.~~ Bayer gotta be really regretting that big Monsanto purchase.

Now do insecticides.

ETA: I retract a bit of my previous statement, looks like they were up to $11b in payouts as of last year, and looking to surpass the $16b they set aside for these lawsuits. Keep slapping that wrist!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was thinking 1.5b sounded like nothing. But this is two people. So, I'm okay with this.

[–] aidan 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to point out, Alex Jones was sued for $1b for being a dick on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Split between about twenty people. So $50 million each vs $750 million each.

And I would also like to point out that Alex's being a dick on the Internet was directly linked to threats of violence made against Sandy Hook families. So his words were far from harmless and far more damaging than your average dick on the Internet.

[–] splonglo 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

A Monsanto shill claimed he would drink the stuff on TV in an interview to prove how safe it was, but the interviewer called him out on his bluff and he refused to do it LMAO. Guy's name was Patrick Moore, ex-greenpeace founder turned paid shill for whatever company is paying him, usually it's climate change denial.

[–] rayyy 6 points 11 months ago

True story: When I was in grade school another kid bragged that a 2-4-D salesman told a bunch of loggers that it was so safe that you could drink it. Afterwards one of the loggers put a $50 bill next to a small cup of the herbicide and dared anyone to drink it for the money. The kids dad drank it and snatched the money. He died of cancer within 10 years.

[–] aidan 5 points 11 months ago

How can you be an ex-founder of something? That's like being an ex-inventor or ex-murderer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

He's also the one who called out Greenpeace for their anti-nuclear stance. Which was correct on his part, but it's sad to see that stance comes with so much other baggage.

[–] steakmeout 3 points 11 months ago

In high school in the 80s our science teacher repeatedly showed RoundUp promotional materials over a period of about 6 months. It was super creepy, almost Leni Riefenstahl in production.