this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
637 points (95.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35624 readers
746 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 239 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm pretty sure it's saying you can't turn left onto the road to the left of the intersection. Looks like some pretty bad road design.

[–] [email protected] 147 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't realize we were here to play geoguessr but you win!

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm gonna say it's easy when the street names are in the photo.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It's also easier when there are no rules saying you can't enter that road name into Google maps.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Easier, definitely. And a unique street name. But it's quite hard to read the cross street name. All I can see is the "E DR" at the end. I probably wouldn't have bothered from just seeing the one street and no other text.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I got lucky with Google Maps highlighting the apartment building in the background as a POI to match up with.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Atlanta and Peachtree Rd/Ln/Dr/Ave/Way/Plaza/literally 65 more variations of this say hello.

[–] Sausage_Mahoney 4 points 1 year ago

I think it makes giving directions easier. Everything in this town is 'just off Peachtree'

[–] batucada 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand the intent from your graphic, but given the signage, I would not have known what they expected of me.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The painting on the road should indicate a 45° left instead of 90° left.

[–] naticus 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Relative to forward travel it's 45°.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Decoy321 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're absolutely correct. I just thought it made for a funny photo. It's very on brand for this city to do dumb shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been confused and made dangerous choices in traffic for less stupid reasons. Not trying to deflect all blame but considering the lowest common denominator, road construction and signs really need to pay much more attention to the limits of the human brain.

Half of us have an IQ below 100 and we could be driving in darkness, with rain pouring down and facing traffic that shines its headlights into our eyes. The road needs to have an affordance that suggests to the driver how to drive correctly, instead of causing confusion when you already have a lot of traffic to keep track of.

[–] takeda 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bad road design for sure, but the sign still could be better. For example they could make a custom sign, draw the intersection and mark explicitly that you can't turn to Oakwood.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] helmet91 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Apart from what some commenters already pointed out (about the orientation of the roads there), I'm not sure how it's going in the US, but in Europe, we have a hierarchy, where the sign on a pole takes precedence over the sign painted on the road.

The hierarchy is:

  1. Police officer's hand signs
  2. Traffic lights
  3. Signs on a pole
  4. Signs painted on the road

According to this, you cannot turn left, even though it looks like a left turning lane.

Is there such a thing in the US?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

Is there such a thing in the US?

Yeah.

  1. Whatever the heck I want, because "ma freedom"
  2. Police officer's hand signs
  3. Traffic lights
  4. Signs on a pole
  5. Signs painted on the road
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Florida. No other explanation needed.

[–] Decoy321 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For real. It's not even the dumbest shit I've seen today. Someone missed an entrance onto i95, so they drove up the offramp intended for the opposite direction. Got 50ft before an oncoming car made them realize their mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Sometimes construction makes for unexpected detours.

(I should probably mention that it's also a dead end road, so no backing out)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

They really said "fuck that house in particular!"

[–] Decoy321 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta jump that roof like a ramp

[–] lemmegogo 5 points 1 year ago

The guy that owns that white car already fell into this trap and got stuck, said screw it, parked, and just moved into the house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mysoulishome 34 points 1 year ago

It’s a detour…you have to drive through the bush.

[–] EpicFailGuy 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hi neighbor .... we should really make /c/miami

[–] Decoy321 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised it doesn't already exist. Do you want the honors? I already mod a few groups here, I can easily help with that too.

[–] EpicFailGuy 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do eet! I don't have the time to run ANOTHER community

[–] Decoy321 5 points 1 year ago

Dale. I'll figure that out once I'm off work later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I knew it. I said "I've only seen road design this bad in one so-called state."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's Miami. Nobody pays attention to street signs anyway.

[–] Decoy321 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I assume that's why they didn't bother doing the proper signage.

Pa la pinga.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So just... Detour through the hedge?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just did the same thing. No left turn onto Oakwood Dr.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I AM RENT A CAR run by I. M. Weasel.

[–] YarHarSuperstar 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me I'm hearing it to the tune of the black sabbath song.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Has he lost his keys?
Can he buy or is it leased?
Can he drive at all
If he moves, maybe uhaul?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't, there's a do not enter sign on the other side.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems the mildly infuriating part is the left out information.

[–] Dozzi92 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's something left of frame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jerb322 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Detour sign says that you should go through the 'Do Not Enter'....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeanEYE 5 points 1 year ago

Makes perfect sense to me. Sign on a pole takes precedence over sign on road.

load more comments
view more: next ›