this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
561 points (96.2% liked)

General Discussion

12036 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ok, imagine this, you are on reddit (say, a slow hobby focused subreddit), everybody there is nice and knowledgeable, and one day, the mods there announced that since there is not enough "content" on the sub, they are going to use a bot to repost content from 9gag in order to "bolster engagement" and "grow the community".

How would you feel about that?

If you feel upset and grossed out, you're exactly right.

I don't think there is a single non-spam subreddit where that kind of behavior would be tolerated without being called out for blatant mod abuse. No community in the world would ever tolerate automated reposting from another website, not reddit, not 4chan, not any forums of any size, even 9gag, I repeat, BLOODY 9GAG, was tired of being called out for reddit reposting and started making original content.

So why exactly should this kind of behavior be tolerated here?

Now, I'm sure some mods here did it with good intentions, but again, the road to the hell that is modern reddit is PAVED with good intentions. Content for the sake of content is bad, and we already knew it is bad, which is why Gallowboob was so thoroughly disliked, he generates """"""content"""""", in other words, spam that drowns out the normal people who can't compete with a professional marketer, much less a bot, which is exactly the reason why "Just block the bots" doesn't work, because it ruins the genuine engagements on a forum by drawing people to the lowest common denominator of """""""""""content""""""""""""".

Reddit, over the years, has turned into a platform for "bolstering engagement" for advertisers, and it does that by algorithmically stoking conflicts between people so they would endlessly argue and doomscroll. Why would we want that here? Now, I think most of us like the Lemmy/kbin right now because of the lack of bots here, and the conversations happen naturally and genuinely. I've even seen people here try to engage the bots, not realizing that they would never get a response out of them, because it felt normal to just talk about things.

(Eat your robot hearts out, @L4s and @BotIt)

Suppose then, if this repost bot situation was indeed temporary, why would people want to make original content if they are just going to be drowned out by bots? What's to stop someone from turning on bots from /r/dankmemes or /r/tiktokcringe? The bots are not members of the community, because they are not people (save the /r/botsright joke for more appropriate times), and over time, we will just become dependent on the bots hosing us down directly from that burning dumpster fire and become doomscrolling addicts again.

That's the number two lesson from the failure of Voat: that repost bots, like hate, should also not be tolerated, and Reddit will never die if we keep feeding it.

Everybody here are still currently all "Oh fuck reddit, fuck spez, I deleted my reddit account and all of my comments and will never go back again", but after finally getting away from reddit, why are you so insistent on trying to turn this place back to the worst part of reddit again?

And if the reddit migration on July 1st does indeed occur, do you think they would be ecstatic to see a place that's mostly reddit reposts, but with less """""""""""""""""""content"""""""""""""""""""? If they wanted reddit, why wouldn't they just go back to reddit?

When will we finally be rid of reddit, if we are the ones keeping it on life support?

I will say, if I sound frustrated, it's because I am frustrated, because I actually can't believe I even had to say this. Judging from the comments on this thread yesterday, I think a majority of people here would agree with me. We have something good here, and I'd like to keep it that way a bit longer.

Now, I very much appreciate that our admins here at lemmy.world and their amazing job of preemptively blocking suspicious bot infested instances, so I'm asking politely for @ruud, @Antik and the rest of our good admin team here to put their foot down on not allowing reddit repost spambots and nip this problem in the bud before it takes root, so I can get back to shitposting in peace.

Be better than reddit.

Burn reddit down.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antik 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Hi!

We actually had a talk about bots this week between admins and some mods!

There was a bot from Lemmy.online that did nothing but import Reddit threads to their instance and when we checked they imported nearly 40k threads from different subreddits. All these threads were posted into communities where the Lemmy.online bot was the only moderator. So that would mean there would be actually zero moderation there and it would ultimately fall on us as admins. So we blocked that bot and instance. We nipped that one right in the bud already!

We are still discussing in where to draw the line, ofcourse there are useful bots: I like those tldr-bots for example. But those should only be active in communities where they have been activated by the moderators.

As you probably noticed this week has already been a big one on the part of decision making and behind the scenes work trying to get this instance updated to 0.18.1 and such, so we didn't finish talking about this amongst the LW team yet. So yes, feel free to express your thoughts on bots and how you feel this should be handled in this thread and you can be sure everything here will be considered.

[–] MargotRobbie 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hi Antik! Appreciate you for listening to mine and many people here's concerns. My thoughts on this is pretty clear, I don't want bots here, but I will concede that the tl;dr bot is useful to others, even though I don't personally use it, so it should stay where it's needed.

However, having a bot running around reposting 5 articles a minute from reddit sets a very dangerous precedent for the quality and community here, and the moderators that set them up usually don't even check what they are posting as they are automated feeds, they have comments calling the article out, but of course, there won't be any response from a bot.

A lot of it is just ragebait from /r/politics and fearmongering bait from /r/technology. I just don't want that feeling of awfulness here, and I think many would agree with me too.

[–] antik 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The consensus so far was a bit like this: as long as the bot is in a channel that is actively moderated and not just spamming as you say "5 articles per minute", then that would be ok. We're still a bit unsure where to draw the line here, as I said we haven't really finished that discussion yet - this week has already been quite eventful.

But even yesterday I received a report from a bot that reported a post from a user who simply said they were "having a shitty day" as "Toxic and Rude". Those kind of bots will only give us more work with the false positives. So I reached out to the owner of that bot and told them we definitely didn't want that kind of "help".

[–] MargotRobbie 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My concern is that usually those bots are setup by the moderators of communities, such as @[email protected] or botit on WorldNews here, and, of course, if they are the ones that set it up, then they will not exert any oversight onto them.

(Again, I don't think they did it with bad intentions, so don't attack them please.)

I think that would just lead to what we disliked about reddit's power mods in that they control the full content to push onto everyone, because they are faster.

Again, my stance on this is that Lemmy should be a place for human beings, and we should minimize the use of bots to what's only necessary, there's enough places on the internet for bots to post spam, so automated content repost, especially from reddit, needs to be stopped.

[–] JeffCraig 10 points 1 year ago

Thanks for blocking that instance.

I tried to explain to their admin why the entire concept was bad for the fediverse but they didn't seem to understand.

People can do whatever they want with their instances, but something like that should defederate themselves and live in a void.

That isn't the way to try and build content or community over here. We have the high ground. We don't need to stoop down to their level.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Flemmy 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Totally agree - when the server was quiet and empty it was one thing, but the server isn't quiet or empty anymore.

It's annoying seeing memes reposted by bots (people can do that just fine all on their own), but I've seen stuff like AITA threads - the OP isn't even here to read it... Is the idea to judge people behind their backs?

I found it extra upsetting because I'm hoping the Lemmy version will be more like AITA using to be - it turned from "who is the problem here" to "did you have the right to do this"

[–] JdW 6 points 1 year ago

We're not on reddit here, we can just call out AITA for the cesspool of lazy creative writing and the absurdly judgemental responses it always was. Nothing like that sub that embodies the worst of reddit should make it over here.

[–] Magister 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like a lot of people here on Lemmy, I was on reddit for 10+ years... and I'd say for a couple of years that half of redit are reposts... the same pic, the same caption, and often the same top comments reposted by bots to gain karma.

At one time I was blocking reposters but now that there's certainly hundreds of bots doing it, it's harder.

I will not miss reddit.

[–] MargotRobbie 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And we need to prevent this place from turning into reddit, and getting rid of the repost bots is the first item on the list.

[–] Magister 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely! There is even an instance that reposts every reddit posts, but it has ben deferedated by about anyone IIRC

[–] eric5949 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I posted a few days ago about this and got tons of agreement that it's at least dumb, really hoping we can get the admins to stop this shit. Manually blocking them myself as they show up is a losing war.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bizzle 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree. Bots should only be allowed if they show exceptional utility to the community.

[–] MargotRobbie 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yeah, nobody really needs a bot that counts how many times you say "this" or smugly correcting your grammar. It was so awful there at reddit.

[–] applejacks 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

BEEP BOOP

Hello there, I'm amicable-bot!

You just did a heckin no no by using the word "sm*g".

It's important to remember that the use of language like this can be demeaning to others.

You're welcome for the helpful information, and have a great day!

BEEP BOOP

[–] MargotRobbie 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a vein popped on my head just from reading that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I hated the grammar correcting bots, because I often misspell things due to being dyslexic. Or I used the wrong words, because I'd be trying to write in a language that wasn't my first one. It got old reaaaal fast.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t imagine how deflating it would be to write a decent reply or comment onto a post, logging in an hour or so later to see a reply for you to then go to read it and it’s nothing but a bot saying β€œYoU sHoUlD hAvE uSeD YoU’rE nOt YoUR” or some shit.

Didn’t ever like them but you’ve made me hate them even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evrala 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People set them up to help grow communities by having a lot of content but it just kills them instead. I opened a Linux gaming community and it was 95% just bot reposts from the Linux gaming subreddit, all with zero comments and 1 or maybe 2 up votes per post. It just makes you not want to comment at all cause what is the point?

I came to Lemmy to get away from reddit, bot reposts just funnel traffic back to reddit. The endless reposts just leads to the one conclusion of "Oh, this is all just links to reddit, I should just go directly to reddit as it will be a better source for this content."

Meanwhile I stumbled upon another community that barely had any posts and it has much more interaction because the few users that -are- there feel much more included. In the early 2000s I was part of several forums that really only had about 10 active members, but they were active and eventually saw growth. People join and see a small group of people talking and then join in the conversation.

[–] MargotRobbie 10 points 1 year ago

Oh, absolutely. I'm taking care to respond to everything in this thread right now because I want us to not be reddit and be a real community.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Beware.. borderline elitist thought below.

There's a group of well-meaning folks (more than I am comfortable with) who want EVERYONE to come over from reddit. A subset of those have decided that the best way to do this is by mirroring content.

THAT IS THE LAST THING I WANT ON ANY TIMELINE.

I came here to GTFO of a forum aggregator that became a corpo-coopted hellscape of shitposts, bots, and shouting into the void; and I sure as hell don't want anyone to bring that shit over here.

A miniscule fraction of users on reddit post, comment, or even help to rank content in any valuable way. The rest detract from any sense of community, clutter conversations.

They need not be placated, invited, or made to feel at home here.

They still have reddit.

Let them use it.

They LIKE it.

[–] MargotRobbie 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. They can choose to come here, but if they want to go down with the ship, let them.

But I don't want them to drag us down with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sneckster 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So many communities are just full of it with no comments. Pretty sure it's putting people off posting too.

[–] MargotRobbie 9 points 1 year ago

Exactly my point. It's a horrible, inhuman feeling to have that seep in here.

[–] Sektor 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People don't get it. We don't need another reddit, this fight is about putting down shitty corporate practices. People just want their echo chamber dopamine fix.

[–] MargotRobbie 10 points 1 year ago

Exactly. We need to stop this place from becoming a corporate hellhole for marketing firms, and you have to ban the bots.

[–] MiddleWeigh 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I agree, I personally don't want them, I like talking to people. I brought it up when they first started spamming, and I blocked lemmit. It was actually the first time i ever blocked anything lol. Out of my control after that, but it's definitely important to talk about it. I don't think we need them. Been having fun so far.

Fwiw, if the posts rolled in way slower, with no bot tags, it probably would have flown under the radar lol.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dettweiler42 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's going to come to a grinding halt when those bots lose API access July 1st

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Most of them don't use the API afaik

[–] hydra 8 points 1 year ago

Good, I hope they die.

[–] roy_mustang76 6 points 1 year ago

Just another way Reddit decisions will help Lemmy grow - can't get drowned in repost bots if they're cut off at the knees :)

[–] LillianVS 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will talk because lifting content from Reddit is how mildly Infuriating got its feet off the ground in the first place, and has the subscriber count it has.

It hasn't relied only on that, I have been finding my own original content and posting it there myself but it's hard when I feel I am the only one actively contributing. Many people here still are very much lurkers and will only want to scroll through what other people post and not make their own content.

There isn't anything wrong with that, but you are going to find people won't keep coming back without things to keep them interested.

That said context matters, there is a difference between a hobbiest community, and somewhere like mildly Infuriating where it's a place to just share things that mildly Infuriates people. Whether right or wrong, I do not see an issue with Reddit reposts or reposts from anywhere but I hope more people do actually create content... And I also hope the people in this thread who are against Reddit reposts are actively engaging communities themselves or you aren't really setting up these communities for success.

I do not agree with bot reposting, I feel that would end in diminishing returns anyway, whilst you have mountains of content, you have too much content and it doesn't give people enough time to build up discussions and drowns out people who will legitimately post their own threads. Meaning you will likely not see anyone bother posting at all.

In the end... Banning outright, doesn't feel right. Having them exist as their own places, whilst not something I 100% agree with don't think getting the pitchforks out and wanting them to disappear is the answer when you can make your own community on another instance and grow it organically. Then block ones that you don't like. Which you will be doing regardless as we have federated instances that will not align with you morally/ethically anyway until they are eventually defederated if at all.

[–] MargotRobbie 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not having Karma also didn't feel right originally either. But it ended up making this place way better.

I don't want to be rude, but let me ask you this question: Why should I move to another instance instead of doing all we can to stop this place from turning into reddit? Why should I move to Mars instead of trying to stop climate change from destroying us all?

To be a redditor is to despair. Despair is the enemy of progress.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ConTheLibrarian 12 points 1 year ago

Yea I think bot posting and rehosting content from reddit has served its purpose but come July should be dialed down significantly.

Even if it isn't reddit content, bot posting should be restricted. There are niche examples where it's beneficial. Eg, Daily Stock Tickers, Geolocal weather, or weekly Q&A threads, but those are clearly different than just content aggregation.

Comment bots also provide value. I agree grammar/etc bots are annoying but as long as people can easily block/delete their comments its okay. Prequel memes chat bots were hilarious and if a community wants them they should be allowed.

People are what makes internet forums fun. Keeping lemmy.world a space for human interactions is important.

[–] firipu 12 points 1 year ago

I started blocking the bots. They're annoying AF.

[–] Prasaedonium 11 points 1 year ago

I agree, they are annoying to see and there is more content coming from local users now

[–] Monkeyhog 10 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I block every reddit reposting bot I see. I left reddit for a reason.

[–] MargotRobbie 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and we should keep them out. The no Nazi in punk bar story still applies here.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Dane 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im split on this. I don’t want a ton of bots spamming memes all over Lemmy but I really do want all the articles that are posted from the news subs to make their way over here. The only thing I find useful from Reddit is that. If one bot reposting all the news means thousands of actual users don’t have to engage with Reddit then I think that’s a net positive.

Since joining lemmy I’ve mostly avoided Reddit but during that 24-48hr period where Wagner was revolting against Putin i had to go back to Reddit because their up to minute news feed was posting updates faster than what we have here. If a bot brought all those posts over here I’d be over the moon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it I wanted Reddit I'd just go to Reddit. It's not like there's any engagement in those threads either ..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlmightySnoo 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agree, we should start banning repost bots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Weird part is we've had better solutions than that for a long time.

If automatically fetching content from reddit is something someone is set on, the best solution in my opinion is something like a digest bot. I.e., here's your daily/weekly/monthly post with the top threads from other communities (like reddit, or other non-federated systems). If you want to talk about any of those threads, you can talk about it in the digest post.

[–] MargotRobbie 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Lemmit.online is that for the fediverse. But lemmy.world is not that, and should not be that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teamster 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate that there were more quotation marks around "content"every time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] greenmarty 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think bots can be used for news etc. I don't see anything wrong with that. It's basically like blog post with discussion. Give you topic to talk about. Obviously bots commenting makes little to sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. I've seen some interesting posts, but I usually won't comment because it's just going to get spammed out by the next bot post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This is why I stopped development of BotIt, if people don't want it then I won't continue making it

[–] MargotRobbie 8 points 1 year ago

And I appreciate you for that. Now let's fix it together.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say they need curation.

There's thousands of posts getting botted over, but maybe five of those have useful content. Most of the time, the good stuff was in the comments. All that needs doing is a team going through what the bot posts and pruning the junk.

There have been some of those posts that were more than just links to a title on reddit. And there's the image posts like from r/funny where (despite me thinking they're dumb as hell) it is content that is forum neutral. So an outright no repost bots rule isn't any more ideal than them having no restrictions at all.

Like, best of legal advice, as an example. Useless bot because all it does is link back to legal advice posts without any of the comments from BOLA these made the sub entertaining. Stuff like that can go and nobody is missing out. But, stuff like r/art, the value is in the posts, so blanket banning that is a loss.

This needs manual curation like r/goodlongposts used to have until reddit pissed off the human that was doing the curation. Curation works for aggregation and reposts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί