this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
77 points (96.4% liked)

Nintendo

18508 readers
59 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think things would've worked out differently if Nintendo hadn't messed up the naming of the Wii U. We probably would've had a line up like this:

• Wii
• Wii Pro (Wii U)
• Wii Portable (Switch)

They're at that crossroad again with the Switch name. What do you think the Switch successor should be called? Keep the Switch name or nah?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zarxrax 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If they keep the switch branding, they need to just call it "switch 2" instead of some name that they think is clever but will just confuse people.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

in JRPG style, call it Switch Zero R.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Nintendo needs to take a drastic step away from every other player in every market they're in.
Call the new console:
Kevin

[–] CKOW 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly think Nintendo is 100% going to fuck up the name of the successor

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

@CKOW @Wussy Nintendo new console tears of the fanbase.

[–] DrAnthony 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think you would fall into the same trap as the Wii U by staying too close to the Switch name. It's muddled by the fact that PlayStation and Xbox brands have become so tightly associated with their parent company's gaming marketing, but Nintendo's most recognizable brand is and always has been "Nintendo".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] garretble 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1000%.

People were smart enough to understand NES -> Super NES. They can understand Switch -> Super Switch.

It’s the perfect name, really. Especially if most of the changes are under the hood. I’d personally just like a better screen and a better CPU/GPU. That’s all I need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wussy 6 points 1 year ago

I agree and I think they fumbled the naming convention as far back as GameCube. Nintendo, Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64 were all known as a 'Nintendo' by the masses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I dunno, I think calling it the "Switch 2" would be very clear that this is the second switch. Playstation did not have this problem in the noughties.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] giacomo 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] slimerancher 10 points 1 year ago

That's the unofficial name of all the Nintendo consoles, and sometimes even non-Nintendo consoles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Add a second screen and call it the Dual Switch. DS for short.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could also make the screen 3D capable and call it 3D Switch. Or 3DS if you will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And then they could release another new console down the line and call it the “New DS”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Rob 8 points 1 year ago

This is so confusing that Nintendo might just go for it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zyratoxx 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Super Switch would be a nice homage to the good old SNES

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Switch is so popular, I'd keep the name. Switch 2 works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Super Nintendo Entertainment Switch

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OmniGlitcher 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the issue with the Wii U was a combination of marketing issues and the name issue. To look at the Wii U's box, unless you're actually aware it's a new console, one may naively assume that the Wii U is actually just the gamepad, and a peripheral to the actual Wii. Like you have the Wiimote, Wiipad sounds a bit off, yeah Wii U sounds fine.

If they keep the Switch name, they need a strong indicator it's a sequel console, rather than something similar. "Switch 2" is the most obvious choice there, but not very in tune with their naming aesthetics. "New Switch" seems more Nintendo-esque but I'm not sure they'd go for it.

I think it would be wise to avoid the Switch name, but also emphasise that it's backwards compatible with the Switch in the marketing. It also depends on what gimmick they give the console, if it has the same gimmick as the Switch, calling it something like the Nintendo Swap might work? Maybe not the best, but neither was "Wii U".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Id say to change the name completely if its a new console otherwise people will think its just like the switch oled where its newer but doesnt really do anything different

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Famborghini 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It needs to be Switch 2 or something different entirely. Otherwise people will get confused.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Narann 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rezz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Don't manifest this evil.

[–] alejandro 7 points 1 year ago

“Sega Dreamcast”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do like the Super Switch. But if the Switch is the standard going forward it’ll make the 3rd iteration a little difficult to name. So Switch 2 is fine

But we’re also assuming they’re going to make a Switch successor. Hopefully that is the case but I don’t quite trust Nintendo not to screw this up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I can see them doing like, "Switch Up"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Son of a Switch.

[–] Foam3477 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer a separate name or something that's easily distinguishable like the Super Nintendo Switch suggestion in comments.

The playstation nomenclature sucks in my opinion, can't tell which is which when looking at them (specially ps3 and ps4 I feel like they're the same)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hpucks 6 points 1 year ago
[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snargledorf 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

i truly hope they won’t call it “new nintendo switch”

[–] pelley 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just like with the NES and the Super NES: The "Super Switch".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] son_named_bort 3 points 1 year ago

Switch-a-roo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Assuming it keeps the hybrid handheld/console model and is backwards compatible with Switch games, then calling it something along the lines of a "switch 2" or "super switch" makes sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›