this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
77 points (96.4% liked)

Nintendo

18465 readers
30 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

|

Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
slimerancher
CosmicSploogeDrizzle
[email protected]
picandocodigo
77
What do you think the Switch successor should be called? Keep the Switch name or nah? (self.nintendo)
submitted 1 year ago by Wussy to c/nintendo
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think things would've worked out differently if Nintendo hadn't messed up the naming of the Wii U. We probably would've had a line up like this:

• Wii
• Wii Pro (Wii U)
• Wii Portable (Switch)

They're at that crossroad again with the Switch name. What do you think the Switch successor should be called? Keep the Switch name or nah?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrAnthony 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think you would fall into the same trap as the Wii U by staying too close to the Switch name. It's muddled by the fact that PlayStation and Xbox brands have become so tightly associated with their parent company's gaming marketing, but Nintendo's most recognizable brand is and always has been "Nintendo".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Super Switch or bust.

[–] garretble 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1000%.

People were smart enough to understand NES -> Super NES. They can understand Switch -> Super Switch.

It’s the perfect name, really. Especially if most of the changes are under the hood. I’d personally just like a better screen and a better CPU/GPU. That’s all I need.

[–] Wussy 6 points 1 year ago

I agree and I think they fumbled the naming convention as far back as GameCube. Nintendo, Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64 were all known as a 'Nintendo' by the masses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I dunno, I think calling it the "Switch 2" would be very clear that this is the second switch. Playstation did not have this problem in the noughties.

[–] spencerwi 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just start giving them numbers. This one will be the Nintendo 8 or something.

[–] darkpanda 2 points 1 year ago

This’ll get super confusing though in 400 years when the Nintendo 64 is coming out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I agree. I think they’ll try to do something different in design and perhaps even highlight whatever new gimmick the system has. Of course I would assume it’ll still have the portability but maybe not highlighted as much to avoid people from thinking it’s the same thing.

A name that’s completely different is a good first step.