this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
337 points (98.8% liked)

196

16582 readers
2307 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

uuu time for one of my fav sentences lul

The worst thing the Bolsheviks did was give Ayn Raynd an education

btw here is a step by step guide to Ayn Raynd's life:

1: be born into obscene wealth

2: be 12, a civil war breaks out, flee to white-controlled crimea

3: the reds win, nationalise the fathers pharmacy

3.5: the reds win, without that she would have never seen a university from the inside

4: be 16 and among the first women to go to university

7: fuck off to the US to whine and cry

8: write incoherent, economically completely unfeasible, idealist defense of a hypothetical capitalism

9: profit

(this is shamelessly copied from a Reddit comment)

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Missed a step between 7 and 8. Become an amphetamine addict and marry wealth.

The incoherent writing and paranoia make more sense.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

mbmb, didn't pay enough attention in Bioshock

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Today I learned that plasmids are an allegory for meth. That makes way more sense in hindsight, just kinda assumed it was drugs in general.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

the more you know, lol

[–] peopleproblems 16 points 1 year ago

the lack of 5 and 6 is pretty damn funny

[–] TotallynotJessica 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correction on 9: die broke and on welfare.

[–] Adori 5 points 1 year ago

Sheeple, how dare you regurgitate other people's opinions smhhh. /s No idea bout what she wrote about ngl, I'll check out a quick summary tho

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is always room for Ayn rand in the trash. It's entirely worthy of its own pile.

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kindling would be more useful. Keep it in an emergency pack in case you wind up homeless.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dont know. The ambient stupidity of Ayn Rand might lead you to homelessness. It certainly led her there.

It's not worth the risk. Best to have it piled among the primordial shit it came from.

[–] FederatedSaint 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have heard so much about Ayn Rand that I decided to see what all the buzz was about and listened to Atlas Shrugged during my commute. That shit was the most insufferable, unrealistic, out-of-touch BS I've ever "read." She really thought a lot of herself. It was a horrible exercise in self-flagellation.

[–] Russty 3 points 1 year ago

The fountainhead really got me amped about architecture!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

both author's books need to be in the trashcan

[–] Donkter 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Max Stirner. Some kind of weird egoistic anarchist. Friedrich Engels liked him a lot in his early years. If I am right Karl Marx wrote a lot about him, but mostly how stupid his ideas were.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just finished Stirner's book, it's interesting. (although I do not agree with even half of the things he says)

Marx and Engels wrote about him in "The German Ideology", criticizing him harshly, but the book was only published after their death.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I looked it up and gave a link to wikipedia here, already. I was not sure, cause the last time I read something about him was like 10 years, ago. You have to read the exchange between Marx and Engels, you'll find more there. It's obvious that nobody would remember Stirner, if Marx & Engels hadn't critized his ideas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The edition I read has a commentary at the end that talks about various people's opinions of the book in the years following its publication, and quotes some passages from Marx and Engels' letters.

It's amazing how few people have maintained a positive opinion about him/his work for more than a few years

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

LOL! Hell no, he wasn't. His ideas were simple, stupid and had not really a connection to the reality. It works maybe on a personal level, but mostly in your mind. If you have a connection with economics and the materialistic world, nah - it doesn't. I think the funniest part is that nobody would remember him, if Engels didn't make a lot of jokes about him. Even the only existing portrait of him is from Engels making fun of him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_German_Ideology

[–] TotallynotJessica 3 points 1 year ago

Homie claimed that all institutions were spooks, only to reinvented the social contract.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ideas about personal connections and your mind are also incredibly important.

If you don't understand how humans work, then you won't be able to create an ideology that works. Economics aren't everything.

Sure, a lot of his works weren't particularly good, but he tried to encompass a psychological component into his works, which hadn't been done previously. His assertions were almost all wrong, but the fact that he tried had massive impacts on socialism as a whole.

In that sense I see him fulfilling a similar role to Freud: He wasn't correct, but his ideas opened up a new direction, which lead the broader field to actually think about and look into that stuff. Writing against Stirner made Marxism encompass some important aspects, like the historical materialism itself, that might not have existed had Stirner not existed.

Stirner was a pioneer, but also mostly wrong. He was important for the development of socialism and for his time, but is now almost useless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There are less people remembering Engels than Stirner...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In what world? Outside of the shitposting of some political internet bubbles Stirner is practically unheard of, while Engels is a cornerstone of scientific socialism and materialist philosophy in general

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

a cornerstone of scientific socialism and materialist philosophy in general

Reads like the rusty letters of a long transformed institution of 'state socialism'. Egoism doesn't give a shit about Stirner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

im pretty sure there are still statues of engels all over the world, while stirner still lies in paper, seen as nothing but a sketch made by engels himself.

stirner is like the rest of anarchism, a overvalued idiot who is only worth anything due to profiting off the actions of their marxist betters

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay ignoring his ideas the Stirner head has some great independent meme material.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was always some kind of a meme. Engels used to scribble a lot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Didn't realize it was a sketch by Engles, its pretty good even has its own style.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think I stole it from PhilosophyMemes in the before times. They had some really great ones. I agree that Stirner is not someone to look up to, but he makes for a great meme.