this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
278 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18966 readers
3401 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] farcaster 96 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Blocking promotions of critical military roles over an unrelated social issue. Really. Why are there so many examples of how today's Republicans would rather burn the country to the ground than concede anything to representatives for roughly the half of the population..

[–] Salamendacious 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think that there are a lot of Republicans right now who only care about not getting a primary challenger and it's a race to the "pure" right.

Tuberville beat incumbent Doug Jones with just over 60% of the vote. He isn't concerned about a Democrat beating him but a more extreme Republican could beat him in a primary.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Once upon a time, it seemed like being an advocate for their constituents and a competent administrator of the country as a whole got politicians reelected. Maybe I have rose-tinted history glasses tho..

[–] Salamendacious 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's always been mud slinging and dirty politics. You can learn more about American mudslinging here. WWII changed American politics a lot. We had just come through the depression and the war and now America was a superpower. A lot of the politicians were veterans who respected each other because many of them served in some capacity. They also had a common enemy in the USSR. That spirit of comity has been steadily eroding and without an external enemy I think too many Americans see their political opposition as the enemy now.

[–] dhork 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We do still have external enemies, the only difference is that they go beyond simply having nukes trained at us, now they fund our political campaigns too.

[–] Salamendacious 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Very true. I think the perception was different during the cold war though.

[–] dhork 3 points 11 months ago

Well. Yeah, during the Cold War the other side was a bunch of godless Communists.

Now the other side is a hyper-capitalist oligarchy, and a good chunk of our politicians openly embrace that. The Republican party is just a bunch of Oligarchs-in-training.

[–] takeda 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

They want those positions vacant so when trump wins in 2024 he can place their lackeys and have more successful coup next time.

[–] Salamendacious 12 points 11 months ago
[–] Zombiepirate 16 points 11 months ago

They want these positions open so they can be filled with extremists who will go along with the next coup.

The social issue is just a cover.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

The GOP platform is effectively to make sure nothing operates so that they can point at the government they constantly fuck up and say "look! Government doesn't work."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Because they want to burn down the country. Simple as that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

They believe thier job is too prevent the government from working. And that's probably why angry people keep voting them in.

Lots of people just want it to burn down that only have a highschool understanding of politics.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This has really gotta piss you off if you risked your life for this country just for some pissant turd senator to block your promotion. Nothing to do with you, no, it's for "reasons" fuck these dudes.

[–] Salamendacious 15 points 11 months ago

I was lucky enough to have an air force general come to a history of strategic thought class and she spent time in the Clinton administration. She definitely wasn't forthcoming about it but reading between the lines you could tell that there's a cultural difference between the brass and the politicians. I think some are probably disappointed and frustrated but they deal with politicians on a somewhat regular basis and expect politicians to showboat. Others are probably very conservative and completely agree with tuberville and his tactics.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sinema came up with the idea and started working with colleagues in both parties on it in early September.

Sinema is actually trying to do something useful? Wow.

[–] HoustonHenry 10 points 11 months ago

She's accidently helpful

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 3 points 11 months ago

I’m sure someone bribed her. Some arms dealer lobbyist was probably like, “If I can get these promotions passed, I’ll surely get that ground war in Asia I’ve been lobbying for.”

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No Republican senator has yet expressed public support for the resolution, and those viewed as most likely to vote “yes” say they would prefer to resolve the impasse in another way.

That's because they'll get death threats if they appear to cooperate with Democrats in any way. Just like we saw in the House and winding up with Gaetz's choice of Mike Johnson for Speaker, Repub Senators are just as terrified to go against Mangolini's magats.

[–] Salamendacious 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think republicans senators clearly remember maga insurrectionists chanting, "hang Mike Pence" on January 6th

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and running for their lives and hiding from the mob.

[–] Salamendacious 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It still boggles my mind that we had a violent insurrection. We all watched something on the news that will be in history books and will be a lecture topic in college us history courses for years to come.

[–] dhork 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We all watched something on the news that will be in history books and will be a lecture topic in college us history courses for years to come.

If we're lucky it will go down that way. If we're not, it will just be a footnote to what happens in 2025 or 2029.

[–] Salamendacious 2 points 11 months ago

I've thought that before many times

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not advocating for violence but shit... Republicans are cowards. I didn't realize you could just bully them into doing things.

[–] Wrench 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Right? Nancy Pelosi had a violent mob chant for her death as they broke into her place of work, and she basically rolled her eyes and kept doing her job.

These wannabe tough guy GOP pussies sure like to act tough, but slink away with their tails between their legs at the first impotent threat

[–] DigitalFrank 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s because they’ll get death threats

Worse than death threats, they might not be reelected. And that's the most important thing (to them).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Fear of being primaried is certainly strong enough to get them to go along with almost anything, but since the rise of the Manchurian Cantaloupe it really has gone far beyond that to fear of literal violence against them and their families. They are thoroughly intimidated and under the control of the extremists.

Of course the threats and violence also extend to election workers, judges, government employees, etc. Remember what happened to Nancy Pelosi's husband as just one example among many in the last few years.
https://plus.thebulwark.com/p/the-fear-factor-in-republican-politics-trump

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How about also fuck sinema?

Sure this is going a same way now, but at least tuberville is predictable. She is much more toxic and dangerous in the long run.

[–] Salamendacious 33 points 11 months ago

If you want to help get rid of Sinema the Democrat running against her is Ruben Gallego

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just to be clear his entire motivation is controlling young women’s bodies.

[–] Salamendacious 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's 100% important to remember that this is the issue. Good on Biden & the DOD for not capitulating.

[–] Xziz 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why has it taken them so long to find this rare procedural rule?

If the country wasn’t run by relics they would be using machine learning models filled with these procedures to ask a chatbot WTF to do.

[–] Salamendacious 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It still requires 60 votes there are 48 Democrats and 3 independents and 49 Republicans. 9 republicans have to go along. I think this is about optics, Republicans finally getting frustrated with tuberville, and the Israeli\Hamas conflict.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

It hasn't. If there are 60 votes, they can do just about whatever they want. They really only need 51, but that would be rude and "nuclear" because of silly rules they made up for themselves.