this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
140 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18879 readers
4110 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 76 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shooting Trump and Giuliani seems pretty extreme. Or do they only mean other criminals?

[–] Evilcoleslaw 66 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They only mean poor people and brown people.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Stealing from a company:

  • person stealing food. Shoot to kill.

  • Manager stealing millions from customers. Oh you! Get outta here you silly billy before we slap you on the wrist again!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Remember, stealing from workers is good. Time theft is good. When you steal from the shareholders or other investors, that's bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You see, dozens of boomers excessive lifestyle relies on you being paid less than minimum wage. That's why it's legal and that's why it's a good thing that you're starving to death while working two jobs and living in a dilapidated cardboard box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Money bags over here, living in a dilapidated cardboard box. I'm living in a hole in the ground.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

But you try to tell kids about that today and they look at you like you're daft

[–] thisisawayoflife 1 points 11 months ago

It's ok, jury nullification will help take care of those people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

And women. And atheists. And non-hetero people. And people who match their definition of “woke”, which is intentionally extremely broad and nebulous.

[–] Substance_P 55 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Seems a bit rich after their last supreme leader is facing 91 felony charges across 4 criminal indictments.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago
[–] Zombiepirate 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We're shooting wage-thieves and tax cheats on sight now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

The change America needs

[–] Alexstarfire 4 points 11 months ago

Not those criminals

[–] logicbomb 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

DeSantis has signaled he is open to firing missiles into Mexico to kill narcotics kingpins involved in the trade of the synthetic opioid fentanyl that is fueling a deadly drug crisis in America.

Okay. There are two methods for dealing with the drug problem. One is to use violence, and really doesn't work at all until you manage to create a totalitarian state.

The other is to treat addicts like humans who are suffering from a disease, and this one always improves the situation.

Ron DeSantis wants to fire missiles into a sovereign country instead of taking care of his own citizens. What's next? Firing a nuke at a hurricane?

These criminals against human decency always choose violence first.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Firing a nuke at a hurricane?

Story time.

I went to a tour of Fermilab, a particle accelerator in Batavia, IL. It started with someone explaining to the room of about twenty people about the general idea of how a particle accelerators work, and what they help us find out. When it came time for question, they first one was from a farmer looking guy sitting in the front row, who said:

If those protrons and electrons are so powerful, how come we can't shoot 'em into tornadoes and hurricanes and stop 'em??

The pause from the speaker before responding was palpable. Sadly, I don't remember the response, because this was in 1982.

[–] cybervseas 9 points 11 months ago

really doesn’t work at all until you manage to create a totalitarian state.

But that’s exactly what he wants…

[–] FlyingSquid 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

In other words, fuck these unAmerican pieces of shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Republicans: "It says cruel AND unusual. If we do it all the time, it's not unusual."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (4 children)

are they gonna start with a mass-suicide?

[–] Darkhoof 8 points 11 months ago

One can dream.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

One can only hope

[–] RojoSanIchiban 3 points 11 months ago

The Flavor Aid would be less messy, but I guess I won't complain either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

If you're the lawmakers then you can change the laws to make what you did legal.

No crime here boss, just perfectly state legitimized theft and racketeering.

See, we charged your money with the crime of being used for illegal purposes and since it didn't put up a defense against itself we put your money in the prison of our wallets.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Vengeance is whose sayeth the Lord?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Like any of them have read the Bible

[–] Spastickyle 7 points 11 months ago

Didn't they understand that The Purge movie is fictional and not a how-to video?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

"Criminals."

[–] JustZ 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And their supporters be like "don't tread on me."

Absolutely fucking idiots.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 4 points 11 months ago

Who gets to pull the trigger?

Because last I checked, a lot of boys in blue racked up a lot of crime.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Trump received little political blowback from inside the party for his rhetoric toward crime while in office, when he routinely called criminals "animals" and "thugs," noted Doug Heye, a long-time Republican strategist.

Violent crimes, including rape and murder, declined in the United States in 2022 from the previous year, according to a report released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation this week.

With Trump nearly 40 percentage points ahead of his nearest rival in the Republican race, his opponents are also incentivized to try to break through by putting forward attention-grabbing policy proposals, even those that appear to advocate state violence.

DeSantis has signaled he is open to firing missiles into Mexico to kill narcotics kingpins involved in the trade of the synthetic opioid fentanyl that is fueling a deadly drug crisis in America.

During the spring state legislative session in Florida, DeSantis signed a bill expanding the use of the death penalty by, among other measures, allowing its use in cases of child rape, which has not occurred in the U.S. since 1964.

At the most recent primary debate in California in September, former Vice President Mike Pence said he would seek to accelerate executions of people involved in mass shootings.


The original article contains 805 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!