this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
395 points (97.6% liked)

196

16509 readers
2870 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Refraction is a harsh mistress.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The shockwave kills everything in the barrel.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Also, I Believe the original saying implied "shoot with a buckshot shotgun".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The saying is "shooting fish", not "shooting a fish". Bet it's pretty easy when the barrel's wall to wall fish.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did Mythbusters never test this

[–] cm0002 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, my bad homie

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i always thought the point was that even if you miss, you've now shot a hole through the barrel and the water will drain out, killing the fish anyways

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you miss, the shockwaves the bullet makes will kill every fish in the barrel anyway. The Mythbusters tested it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

sure, but i guess what i mean is like, that's why the meaning of the idiom is clear to me even having not tested or watched someone test what the actual effect of firing a gun into a barrel full of fish would be. if you were ever in a conversation, prior to watching that episode, wherein someone used the idiom to describe a task, and you were like "oh, you mean that'll be easy, because the shockwave from a gun shot would kill all of the fish in a barrel at the same time", before you watched the mythbusters episode, i guess you're a lot smarter than me

[–] wreckedcarzz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This saying never made sense to me. You already have trapped the fish. If you shoot them, they become inedible. Why not just starve them, or tip the bucket over and a couple minutes later bam, dinner for the whole village.

Who tf was like 'ima blast these little swimming fools' and why in the fuck were people like 'that sounds like a great idea, I can be a real badass now'. Those people just sound like wannabes.

Now who's helping me tip over this barrel?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you never heard a saying before?

[–] wreckedcarzz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That doesn't dismiss the fact that the premise is incredibly stupid.

[–] secondaccountlemmy 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So is a bull in a china shop but that's what sayings usually are.

And who's the fucking asshole that steals candy from a baby??

[–] wreckedcarzz 4 points 1 year ago

Hey now, babies shouldn't have candy. It's a choking hazard, I'm doing them a favor!

👶🍬🏃

[–] Maalus 3 points 1 year ago

No it is not. It means to do something really simple - which shooting a fish in a barrel is. It doesn't need to be the most logical thing people do, it just needs to be easy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Lethal shockwaves go brrr, actually