this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
111 points (94.4% liked)

News

25129 readers
5334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top U.S. law firm Davis Polk announced in an internal email that it had rescinded letters of employment for three law students at Harvard and Columbia universities who signed on to organizational statements about Israel, one of the latest responses to open letters from university groups about the Israel-Hamas conflict that have roiled university donors, employers, alumni and students.

“These statements are simply contrary to our firm’s values and we thus concluded that rescinding these offers was appropriate in upholding our responsibility to provide a safe and inclusive work environment for all Davis Polk employees,” said the email, signed by Neil Barr.

Small-business lawyer Joseph Gerstel posted a screenshot of the email Tuesday on LinkedIn. A Davis Polk representative confirmed it as authentic.

Barr went on to write, “At this time, we remain in dialogue with two of these students to ensure that any further color being offered to us by these students is considered.”

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glimse 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The relevant portion of the letter since the summary emits what the law firm is mad about:

On Oct. 10, The Harvard Crimson, one of the university’s student-run news publications, reported that more than 30 Harvard student groups signed on to a letter that said they held Israel “entirely responsible” for “all unfolding violence” in the conflict

[–] JustZ 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Additional violence at this point, seems to me that's on Israel. You don't get to use self defense to kill your attacker and then also go kill your attacker's family and friends, lay waste to their home. A disproportionate response exceeds the scope of the cassus bellum, and thereby becomes unjust itself.

[–] Gingerlegs 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn’t sound like a place you’d want to work anyway

[–] JJROKCZ 1 points 1 year ago

Of course not, law firms are terrible. But they pay decent and in general law is a well earning field

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Institutions of higher learning are only allowed to pump out cogs for the Machine, not educated people who can look at facts and decide how to act.

Fuck Davis Polk for doing this shit.

[–] JustZ 6 points 1 year ago

School is what you make of it. But generally when you're coming out of a top law school and going to work at a place like this, you know what you're getting into, you know you're getting in bed with corporate devils who's only motive is money and power.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 6 points 1 year ago

These are people who went to Harvard Law School. I imagine they will be fine.

[–] TheDarkKnight 2 points 1 year ago

Just freedom of speech in action, you can say what you want but you're tied to the consequences of what you say. No one did anything wrong here, students expressed a controversial viewpoint and a workplace expressed that they did not want to bring that into their office--it's fine. They are Ivy League law school grads, something tells me it will be okay.

[–] Copernican 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did you go to school that allowed you to be so enlightened and free?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm old so remember a time when a general arts degree was a great way to be able to get a good job in a field that one enjoyed.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 23 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder, the architects of the migrant concentration camps are all doing fine.

These kids signed a letter expressing a political opinion and are getting harmed. People who abducted children and placed them into concentration camps are doing fine. One is exercising a basic right the other is a crime against humanity.

[–] Copernican 3 points 1 year ago

Does anyone have a better representation of the original Harvard letter and who signed. Where I am confused is that the authoring group is the "Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee" and co-signed by 33 other Harvard student organizations. (https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/10/10/psc-statement-backlash/)

So how are lawyers and other graduate degree candidates get put under this. I can't tell if folks are more fairly being punished by explicit signature, or more inferred to be a part of it by affiliation.