this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
263 points (97.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44151 readers
1401 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So a view I see a lot nowadays is that attention spans are getting shorter, especially when it comes to younger generations. And the growing success of short form content on Tiktok, Youtube and Twitter for example seems to support this claim. I have a friend in their early 20s who regularly checks their phone (sometimes scrolling Tiktok content) as we're watching a film. And an older colleague recently was pleased to see me reading a book, because he felt that anyone my age and younger was less likely to want to invest the time in reading.

But is this actually true on the whole? Does social media like Tiktok really mould our interests and alter our attention? In some respects I can see how it could change our expectations. If we've come to expect a webpage to load in seconds, it can be frustrating when we have to wait minutes. But to someone that was raised with dial-up, perhaps that wouldn't be as much of an issue. In the same way, if a piece of media doesn't capture someone in the first few minutes they may be more inclined to lose focus because they're so used to quick dopamine hits from short form content. Alternatively, maybe this whole argument is just a 'kids these days' fallacy. Obviously there are plenty of young adults that buck this trend.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 186 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Nothing has changed

I don't believe anything has changed neurologically or psychologally in the last decades.

There have always been people who are more susceptible to consume "trashy" (provoking, easy to consume) media.

Once it was low-quality newspapers (a german band once refered to them as "fear, hate, tits and the weather forecast", which fits really well!), then it was trash TV, then mobile games, and now TikTok and stuff. Some people are just attracted to flashy stuff and can't get enough dopamine.

It's just that the latter example is very new, and everything new is automatically bad, no matter what.

There have always been young people who read books, create art, video game, listen or create music, have hobbies, and so on.

BUT, something has changed:

One word: attention economy. Capitalism realized, that especially in combination with ads, you can create A LOT of money by making easy to consume content.

If a platform uses dark patterns (emotional or funny content, reinforcement, short content instead of longer stuff, flashy stuff, likes, endless scrolling, keeping you as long as possible in the app, etc.), it makes a lot more money with it's users.

Years of algorithms perfectionized manipulating you and your attention span with supernatural stimuli (as mentioned above).

What to do with those informations?

Notice, how boring Lemmy, RSS-feeds, and stuff like that are?

After checking my posts for this day, I'm done and do something different, like cleaning the kitchen. Now, I'm on the toilet and don't have anything else to do, and I have fun answering you :)

That's how our devices should work. I don't wanna be a slave, I want to own my device, and not the other way around.

Tbh, I'm grateful Reddit went downhill. A year ago I could never imagine nuking my account.

I spent my whole teenage and now adult years (15 - now) on that shithole, was super addicted and couldn't spend 2 minutes without checking my phone, even in meetings, dates, and so on. It was just as bad as vaping for me. I knew, that it was slowly killing every brain cell, but "loved" it too much.

Thanks, u/spez ❤️ You killed Reddit for me and made my new "Reddit" (-> Lemmy, but with the same app) THAT boring for me I bought an e-reader now to read books instead😂

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes I think you're right. People haven't changed, but the environment has changed - it's continually getting better at manipulating us.

Lemmy does have a limited amount of content, but what it does have seems to be of higher quality. Which is perfect! We don't need constant, cheap content.

[–] Moghul 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think Lemmy has higher quality content, but it has less content which makes you interact with it to get more of your social media fix. I've seen this post a couple times passing by, and I've just come back to look through the comments because there isn't anything new to see.

[–] soupspoon 9 points 1 year ago

I would say higher quality content in that the comments are pertinent and not just jokes. Sometimes I'd spend a couple of minutes reading nonsense on Reddit before realizing, then I'd try to scroll way down for a fresh comment thread, then just give up on the post

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't agree with "better content" per se.

There's just as much "spam" (links to articles, low effort posts, etc.) as everywhere else. At the same time, the content is waaaay better.

Karma

The fact that you don't have to keep your karma in mind here let's you speak more freely.

If I would say "Pineapple on pizza is disgusting", I would have been downvoted to oblivion on Reddit. Here, they just ignore it, OR, don't downvote and tell me why I might be wrong.

Back to Reddit: That, in fact, would give me two options:

  1. Delete this said comment, which would discourage discussions and make every community hive-minded, or,
  2. Stay strong to my opinion, and loose the ability to post to many subs anymore, because I now have -5000 Karma.

I always chose 1... Here, I don't care. And this mindset has lead to many great, mind opening discussions.

Even on subs like r/Changemyview or r/Unpopularopinion this culture didn't exist. No opinion was unpopular, merely "weird" (like "I like my socks wet" and stuff). Every "unpopular" opinion was popular on Reddit. And elsewhere, everything was a fight.

On this site, disagreeing is only for useful discussions I had/ read too. It's almost like an "anti-echochamber", and I love it! I love my opinions being challenged.

One more result of that is that the upvote/ downvote function went from "I agree/ I find that funny" or "This is against the subs opinion" to "This comment is worth reading for others and adds value. OP put work into it". WHICH IT SHOULD ALWAYS HAVE BEEN! This button isn't for disagreeing, it's for FILTERING out trash!


Algorithm

Also, there's no algorithm. On many other social media, post that make you laugh (-> mostly dumb stuff or reposts) or promote strong emotions (mostly aggression and tribalism) got promoted.

Here, it's somehow totally random. There's so much "boring" stuff on my trending page. But, I've discovered many cool niche subs here I wouldn't have otherwise. I didn't know so many people were into collecting space rocks and model trains for example 😁

E.g., my own gourmet-mushroom-growing-community got super many views and comments from people who've never heart of that before. That was unbelievable!

On the other hand, there's sooo much useless information, some opt-in filtering/ algorithm wouldn't be bad tbh. But many say that about account karma too, which is a way smaller feature, and that has repercussions too (see above). Something like an algorithm would be HUGE, but also maybe hugely bad for this site?

Idk, tell me! Be controversial! 😁

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes the karma system here is way better! It definitely reduces the hive mind mentality.

I don't think we need any kind of algorithm though. That would only serve to make the popular stuff more popular and the niche stuff gets buried. Maybe if I could personally filter out communities that I'm not interested in?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yes the karma system here is way better! It definitely reduces the hive mind mentality.

Sure, but we have to make sure we communicate what the up-/downvote function actually is for. Many Reddit-refugees would otherwise just keep it as a "I agree"-button, and nothing would change for the better.

Maybe if I could personally filter out communities that I’m not interested in?

I agree with the sentence before, but I don't think filtering out everything you're uninterested in is remotely possible. Yes, you can filter out some specific communities you dislike, like all those Linux-subs, if you find them annoying. (OH, btw.: That was a comment in one of their/ our memes, and when one guy, coming from outside the sub, complained this stuff is constantly on his trending page, someone suggested "We're only 3 popular subs. Just blacklist us and you'll never hear from us again" it really resonated with me!)

Alternative?

I personally would rather enjoy a "promote" than "bury" function, something like a "GigaUpvote™" for posts you wish others to see too. Market the up- and downvote button as a quality filter, especially for comments, and if a post gets a certain ratio of up- and downvotes, comments and promotions, it will appear on the "popular"-tab.

Just as an additional function, IF YOU WANT. Keep the "old" spirit for those who prefer it, and suggest it for newcomers to find new content. And make it easy to toggle off for social media junkies like myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting off reddit was one of the best things I've done for myself in years. I'm still fairly active on lemmy thanks to having a lot of free time at work but I've also been reading and making an earnest effort to enrich my mind again. Feelsgoodman

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here. I have nothing of value to add.

What changes did you notice in your thought patterns when you withdrew from Reddit?

What books are you into and would recommend? Is there a community here?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I noticed that I take a lot more care and attention on my posting on lemmy in general. The conversation can be much richer than it is on Reddit and I feel that it's worth my time to sometimes write several paragraphs, cite sources and really dig into a topic. Be it star trek lore, political theory, or the weather. It's nice to have a space where thoughts can be challenged and discussed without it devolving into a shit slinging competition. I also don't find myself on lemmy much when I'm not at work which has led to me being more present in my home life I've been able to get more done around the house. I have terrible ADHD and it came as a surprise how much easier it's been, it's still difficult but it's better. I find I've just slowed down a bit and been more attentive overall. I won't attribute that wholesale to reddit as I've been making other lifestyle changes lately but being online too much was certainly an issue and it's made those other changes easier by virtue of having more time.

I'm on a big political theory bend right now as far as reading goes. I've read the conquest of bread, mutual aid, the state and revolution, bullshit jobs, some of capital (it's boring as fuck lol), the dawn of everything, some short writings from Malatesta, and a few others I'm blanking on right now. I'm also working my way through the Lord of the rings as well. I plan on revisiting some old favorites down the line too.

As for recommendations, I can't praise The Dawn of Everything enough. I lumped it in with politics earlier but it's really not (in the traditional sense). It's co-written by anthropologist David Graeber and archaeologist David Wengrow. In the book they attempt to go through the historical, anthropological, and archeological record to construct a grand narrative for the development of human society. They offer some very compelling evidence against the old myths of the noble savage or primitive barbarian that have been the dominant theories of human social development since the late enlightenment. It's truly eye-opening and fascinating. Also, if you haven't read the Lord of the Rings before, do yourself a favor and give it a go, you won't regret it.

There are a few book communities here, but I'm blanking on which instances they're on at the moment. I'll have to go through my subscribed pages and come back to link them

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] benignintervention 7 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why I love Lemmy. I noticed it within hours of quitting reddit. The sheer volume of content on Reddit, plus the algorithms, kept my attention for hours. Lemmy just isn't that big and probably 60% of the content I see is in swedish, gerrman, or dutch, which I can't read, so I spend like 15 or 20 minutes max here and then go do something else.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Walls of text everywhere I'm scared

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao. Took me a while to understand this.

[–] HarriPotero 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you have short attention span.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the joke, my friend.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Try reading a book for 5 hours in the city surrounded by your devices, and try doing it in nature with no devices around you. We didn't change, but our world did and we adapt with it. Of course, things wouldn't be so bad if there weren't people getting unimaginably rich by trapping your attention.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

It's genuinely more effective in today's society to skim read and give up if the content isn't good. There is so much time wasting bullshit, misinformation, ads, and scams put in front of us. But we don't have a great defense mechanism, so our attention spans have suffered alongside the quickening of our skepticism response.

[–] Lauchs 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a great book that covers this called The Shallows. Basically, they argue yes. Internet is designed in such a way to keep you clicking and scrolling. As people have used internet devices while their brains are forming we are likely shaping those brains to a more distractible form.

[–] KaiReeve 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Mine certainly is.

If you want to compare your attention span to what it once was, try watching older media. The wife and I were watching the walking dead and I was getting bored and that's only 10 years old. Try watching 2001: A Space Odyssey without any distractions. It's torture.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ok well 2001 was kind of an outlier... you're not wrong. It was slow when I watched it in the 90s lol.

But, watch something like The Maltese Falcon. Which I did recently.

I had no issue following. It didn't plod along in my view (of course I'm middle aged and don't do tiktok). But it also wasn't rapid fire constant clamor. There was space to absorb and reflect as the story evolved. And you need that space because it's mentally challenging.

One thing that hit hard is how it is a good, interesting story above all else. Definitely gives theater vibes and made me realize how hollow a lot of movies are.

Anyway. There are lots of examples from the 60s and 70s that are slower paced and a lot less busy and chaotic than modern films for sure.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An older film I really recommend is Twelve Angry Men. No special effects or camera work. Just twelve jurors in a room discussing a murder case - and I was hooked throughout! Perfectly paced.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but there are also modern films and TV shows that could be considered "slow" and are fantastic. There's more media in general, and a larger portion is definitely catered to short attention spans, but there's still some great, "slow", shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you try watching a good show though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skybreaker 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I don't know about you, but I'll still sit down to a marathon of LOTR extended edition. So, mine is maybe about the same as 20 years ago. Maybe not though because LOTR could be an exception because it's the GOAT.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yes behaviourally, no empirically.

You get a positive dopamine reactive from viewing multiple short form content pieces in succession, you get an arguably more valuable serotonin reaction from viewing a more in depth piece and maybe feeling like you learned something.

How you’re affected by these feelings of satisfaction will influence your behaviour. I recently compared mine and my wife’s weekends, she’d watched a lot of short form content and couldn’t remember a thing, felt empty from it, I’d watched a series of a tv show and could talk about the story and concepts.

But that’s not all there is to it, Plato argued that the written world would dumb people down because they no longer had to remember things and pass them on vocally, maybe a decrease in the requirement for individual cognition, but obviously an overall good.

Edit: edit was messing with me so I couldn’t add this til now. I’m just a drunk guy enjoying dinner and browsing Lemmy, what you’re looking for is the simple answer, the dopamine hit, a minimal conversation. Put your attention span to the test and look into some open access research on the subject, it’ll be fun! And its all that seperate us from the YouTubers that we venerate so much

[–] Dasnap 10 points 1 year ago

I do find it funny that people generally seem to be viewing shorter videos, whereas I often don't want to start a video shorter than 20 minutes. I've been watching a lot of Cathode Ray Dude and those videos have girth.

It's also funny that YouTube tried to kill off short videos a decade ago and are now desperately trying to roll that back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

I remember when I was a kid they'd discuss teens as the "MTV generation", kids who didn't really watch TV, they just watched music videos, and even then there was scrolling news down the bottom and boxes would pop up on the side showing different things. They said kids had attention spans of 12 seconds and it would cause massive issues with finding work and being productive as adults.

I'm in my 30's now and I've heard the same thing about every generation since.

It seems that the real issue is that teenagers have short attention spans and adults have amnesia.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And the growing success of short form content on Tiktok, Youtube and Twitter for example seems to support this claim.

You can't really make a conclusion from this. Maybe our short attention span is the reason short form content is so popular.

I guess it's not our attention span declining, but just that we are not used to waiting or getting bored.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I noticed my capability to keep my attention on a single subject dramatically increased after Reddit shit the bed and killed 3rd party apps, making me effectively quit social media for a month or two.

I should also really drop Lemmy as well, as much as it is fun it is constantly nagging my brain for attention. It's better than Reddit imo, but short-form content really does make you less able to keep your mind focused. After all, a distraction is just a couple taps away...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't stand tiktok, Instagram or any of those short video sites.

I still watch hour long YouTube videos of dudes working on cars and documentaries talking about the most random things you can imagine.

People are getting dumber and their attention span sucks

[–] Cort 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every 30 days I have to hide YouTube shorts because if I don't I'll get sucked into a hole until 3 in the morning without even realizing it.

I still watch long form content, but man are those shorts addictive.

[–] Wisely 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How does this work? You watch 100's of ~10 second videos in a row for hours? Trying to understand because this seems to be a common thing these days.

I have never tried tiktok and only saw some YouTube shorts. I see one or two and it annoys me because it's clipped badly, gives bad information, or just shows something meaningless. Random loud music. The same video keeps playing on a loop as I try to think.

Even if it was great content, my brain just couldn't stay focused beyond a couple videos. The constant changes to a new video would be exhausting for me. There's also no time to think about what you just saw.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jeom 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i remember Michael Stevens saying in an interview with Anthony Padilla that the subway surfers gameplay concept isnt really new and we've been doing the same thing for ages, rather than subway surfers while listening to some bot read reddit posts, people were listening to their friends while looking at birds or animals at a zoo, or even getting heavily intoxicated to help converse with your friends.

and people have said that people are getting dumber but i think theyre just young let them grow up then compare. we have been laughing at stupid ass jokes, shitty songs and toilet humour since the beginning of time.

people from the 13th century might be saying that we're lazy for not making our clothes by and settling for an inferior product made by machines, but in the grand scheme, does it really matter that much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j4k3 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My tolerance for wasting my time has changed. I have more access to more relevant content closer to my interests, so why should I waste my time with older forms of media that are poorly aligned with me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It's almost like you started reading this Time Article but never finished.

Or maybe this sciences times article

While the consensus is out about whether or not or attention spans are really shortening, most sources say whatever is going on, isn't permanent...yet.

We still have the ability to unplug and find something that's truly interesting to us, something that we care about, and focus on it. We just have to find it, and then, actually do it.

[–] Mighty 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it has, it has only been a recent phenomenon. Hell, the need for a large portion of the population to concentrate for a long period of time is a recent development.

Attention spans are only really an issue where attention was economically valuable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can only speak for myself, and am not a teen, but I can tell you I used to be able to, but can no longer: hear a person's phone number once and memorize it, remember 4-5 directional turns without writing it down, watch a 2 hour movie I'm not enthralled with, stare at traffic or people walking by and not be upset I'm wasting my time.

I think it's more the access to knowledge and productivity that has changed our society's concept of what needs to be remembered or what we should spend our thought on, than it is a generational neuro-difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'd think it's more that there's now more media fighting your attention. When I was a kid (GenX here), we had a handful of TV channels and books. Books was what I went with.

Nowadays, I get home from work and watch something on YouTube before bed. I still read, but my standards have risen, and a trashy space opera won't do it anymore for me. It has to be a great one now, and there are fewer of them. So, naturally, YouTube gets a bigger share of my time. Or games, when I have time to play on the weekends. My comfort game used to be Civilization, and currently I'm hooked on Baldurs Gate.

load more comments
view more: next ›