this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
166 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2459 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) announced Friday that he will strip funding for Ukraine out of a Pentagon spending bill after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) joined conservatives in blocking the legislation from advancing earlier this week.

McCarthy said he would remove the $300 million for Ukraine currently in the Pentagon appropriations bill and hold a separate vote on the funding.

“It would be out and voted on by itself,” McCarthy said when asked about the Ukraine aid in the Pentagon appropriations bill.

The Speaker’s announcement comes one day after a band of five conservatives opposed a procedural vote for the Pentagon appropriations bill, sinking the effort and preventing the legislation from moving forward. It was the second time this week that hard-liners blocked the funding bill from advancing.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Man the Republicans changed. Not 40 years ago everything red is dead, and now they're falling over eachother to be able to suck Putin's dick. Anything for money and power, no?

The weird thing is just that people somehow don't see this?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

Because they have finally realized that modern day Russia is not the Soviet Union. They fucking love what Putin has done to Russia. Putin has turned Russia into a fascist state supported by the Russian Orthodox Church. The Republicans wish they could do the same to the US.

[–] Son_of_dad 23 points 1 year ago

I'm from Central America, Republicans and Americans started a proxy war and used as all as fodder, made us fight a civil war where each side was funded by Americans and Russians. They made us all fight and die just to keep the Russians out of this side of the world. They killed so many of our people and torched our country, just so they can call us racist names for fleeing the war to the u.s, and they can suck Putin dick and give in to the Russians they killed us over.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 14 points 1 year ago

Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing. These are people who refuse to admit when they're wrong, so rather than admit that they were wrong about the Republicans, they just find ways to justify it instead to soothe their psyche. And the people running the show know this and use this to great effect.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Try 10-11 years ago. Republicans were still pointing to Russia as the biggest threat to the US at the time. They still weren't right but it's a 180 turn to now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The weird thing is just that people somehow don’t see this?

I have the unfortunate privilege of having to hear right wing rumble shit almost daily. These people are repeatedly being fed whatever the Kremlin says and literally everyone else is wrong. The sad part is you can go back months and none of the shit (not just wrt Ukraine) has ever materialized but they kept getting promised that it will. And the globalist elite is going to be destroyed by Rump any day now. He has them right where he wants them and only he can save us! And yes, that is word for word something I've heard countless times.

[–] Beaphe 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She told him in front of an audience that she would "fuck him up" six months ago.

Imagine being terrified of Mammy Traitor Green.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well have you seen her? Pretty sure we have an Encino Man situation going on there. She is probably freakishly strong from having to battle sabretooth tigers and dinosaurs before getting stuck in a tar pit.

[–] Betch 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For a second I actually thought the thumbnail picture was Dog the Bounty Hunter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] midori 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those shoes are mine, Betch!

[–] Betch 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, am I missing a reference here? 😅

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

McCarthy might be the biggest coward in Congress. And there’s a lot of competition for that title.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so how the hell did it flip so hard? "russia bad" used to be the most simple thing they rallied behind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Money, kompromat, a model for their vision of fascism, who can say ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ViewSonik 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Green is a scab on our country

[–] Son_of_dad 12 points 1 year ago

Scabs heal. She's a cancerous tumor.

[–] FuglyDuck 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More like the crusty pus that oozes outbid the cracks of an infected scab.

[–] badbytes 23 points 1 year ago

Good job McFucksy, waste more of the Americans tax dollars doing dumb shit. Flesh waster.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, why don't we have every single line item in its own bill then, and vote up or down on every single thing? Perhaps every individual word could be its own bill.

[–] FuglyDuck 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I feel like maybe that’s the way it should be.

It’s idealistic, I know, but I really dislike the idea of tit for tat pork being attached to get routine government programs funded.

The problem is these assholes prefer to extract everything they can through brinksmanship and spinning tires rather than actually going to the compromise they all know will be settled on.

[–] Fedizen 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're talking gov funding bills they should all be passed a year in advance. This constant edging shit is a result of the news cycle.

[–] FuglyDuck 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

exactly. In an ideal world, each item should be it's own thing, discussed on it's own merits, without any risk of that thing getting defunded because of political wankery. they certainly shouldn't be lumping in a watering down of federal authority to control immigration rules, for example.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

She is like a Karen's final form.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Fucking weasel.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) announced Friday that he will strip funding for Ukraine out of a Pentagon spending bill after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) joined conservatives in blocking the legislation from advancing earlier this week.

McCarthy said he would remove the $300 million for Ukraine currently in the Pentagon appropriations bill and hold a separate vote on the funding.

The Speaker’s announcement comes one day after a band of five conservatives opposed a procedural vote for the Pentagon appropriations bill, sinking the effort and preventing the legislation from moving forward.

The rule failed for a second time on the same day that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met with lawmakers in the Capitol.

“Our defense appropriations bill should never be going to fund a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine, so this is a victory for common sense,” she later added.

The failed rule vote Thursday was a blow to McCarthy, who has sought to advance the appropriations process ahead of a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline — to no avail.


The original article contains 555 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!