this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
197 points (95.4% liked)

Fediverse

17016 readers
437 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new messaging app is in development, and the project is described as "an open source WhatsApp for the Fediverse."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bappity 74 points 10 months ago (1 children)

something something 15 competing standards

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

unfortunately matrix sucks revolt isn’t federated and irc is outdated so

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I just learned about Matrix recently. Seems like something that'd be good. What sucks about it?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Besides the main implementation synapse being slow, the new implementation dendrite is unfinished but progressing.

But technical standards aside, the hassle of managing encryption keys is too buggy and confusing IMO. That'll deter most people I feel.

I want it to be great but it just isn't there yet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I personally really like Matrix, but there are a few outstanding complaints about it. The biggest one is that the reference implementation everyone uses by default is known to be bloated and slow, and poor at scaling. Server admins have had a huge challenge of supporting a large amount of data for things like room history, which in the past required propagation to every server hosting every participant. The protocol itself has been described by some developers as overtly complex.

Some of this seems to be improving, particularly with development of a Go-based backend implementation, Dendrite.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

And if dendrite fail, we wait for the rust-based backend implementation. :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@deadsuperhero
> the reference implementation everyone uses by default is known to be bloated and slow, and poor at scaling

This doesn't seem to stop the fediverse growing (*cough* Mastodon *cough*).

@Terevos

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

IRC is only "outdated" if you make it so by using outdated networks like libera.chat that refuse to implement the newer standards that have been available for years.

Oh and XMPP is a thing and works great.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Feels like Jabber has been around for a long time. If I'm not mistaken I remember my buddy pimping it as an AIM alternative back in the Napster/mp3 days.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Matrix is getting better on fast peace, we need to give it another yew years to fix biggest holes I guess.

ActivityPub based chat is going to suck much. Like basing chat on RSS or FTP, it can be done but why. Unless we're talking just about replicating Instagram-like DMs then maybeee? But I still would like to just add link to Matrix in bio instead of having chat in yet another place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Oh boy... Another messenger... Yay...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is telling you to use it. This originally spun out of development of a messaging app just for Pixelfed, but evolved when the dev realized it could be made to work with any Fediverse account, not just his own server project.

An optimistic view is that it could end up opening the door for end-to-end encryption to come to private messages in Fediverse servers, over time.

[–] 9tr6gyp3 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I think what @[email protected] is trying to explain is that Mastodon and Lemmy for example may be able to implement Sup as a part of their softwares too. Currently if you try to DM someone on Lemmy, the options are a Matrix redirect, or Private Messages designated as not secured.

Though I do wonder about the viability of this. People would still need to set up with Sup to receive messages, at least as I understand it. As a result, this would run into a similar problem as matrix, just without needing to use a different federated server and login I suppose.

This would also require that project leads for AP softwares would want to accept the service as a part of their distribution, assuming it even is implmented in such a manner.

TL;DR it's hard to say anything for certain when details seem to be slim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

With the open nature of the fediverse I actually see some potential here. Right now there isn’t a single messenger that I truly like. They’re all just different shades of okay or worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Signal is great, but the core developer is inherently against federation with his own product. It's just one giant centralized service.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

It feels like I'm doing shady backdoor deals. It's only for the people I conspire with and really close friends...

In which we just end up using regular old sms anyway lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how it'll compare to Matrix.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think it's intended to be more like WhatsApp, in the sense that you use it for one-on-one chats or messaging small friend groups. I don't think it's a current goal to try to take on Matrix / Element.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

use it for one-on-one chats or messaging small friend groups

Those are exactly what I use Matrix for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BallShapedMan 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm for it, plus I like the name.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

What's Sup?

Nothing much, you?

No, what's, Sup?

... Just chillen...

Visible anger.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I ever create my own messaging app, it'll be called "updog".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar 5 points 10 months ago

’Who's on first’ vibes :-)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Kinda shows how what's up has evolved over the years

What's up - WhatsApp sup - Sup

[–] glimse 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The name makes me think of the Bro app from Silicon Valley

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm excited for it. I'm hoping it becomes a federated, self-hostable Signal.

It's way easier to sell friends and family on yet another messager when you tell them "look, it comes with a twitter/facebook/instagram/reddit too!"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do we if it will have scope to do group chats at all or well?

Seems to me that private group chats are significant piece missing from the fedi, especially as they seem to me to be a reasonable alternative platform structure compared to all the doom scrolling engagement stuff that the Fedi has so far more or less sought to simply clone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Groups support seems to be coming to pixelfed soon at least

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm much more excited about Veilid than another server-based thing, even if it's federated servers. Fully peer-to-peer seems like the way to go for direct conversations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty curious about Veilid, and eager to check it out. But, I believe that peer-to-peer and federated could theoretically complement each other very well, especially when it comes to building infrastructure for this big weird network we're a part of.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

He's working on multiple things at once. Where he finds the energy, I don't know, but PubKit, Sup, and a few other things are all happening right now.

This one article is part of a series where I'm hoping to put up one feature per day of what he's been working on. Pixelfed is notoriously hard to cover, because the lead dev is so active.

load more comments
view more: next ›