this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
479 points (99.0% liked)

News

25178 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kellogg’s is waging a war here over Tigre Toño and Sam el Tucán.

A 2019 policy requires companies that make unhealthy foods to include warning labels on the front of any boxes they sell in Mexico to educate consumers about things like excess sugar and fat. Any food with a warning label — like Kellogg’s Fruit Loops or its Frosted Flakes, which typically contain more than 37 grams of added sugar in a 100-gram serving — is also banned from including a mascot on its packaging.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kelloggs has been on the wrong side of history from its conception when they tried to make people stop jerking it

[–] xkforce 73 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Kellogg would be rotating in his grave. The dude was OBSESSED with the healthfulness of cereal (or at least his weird version of it) and his company namesake basically peddles candy in cereal form to children.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dude thought that meat and flavorful food caused sexual desire and lead to masturbation. He was an anti-masturbation crusader and invented his breakfast cereal to help decrease sexual desire.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I'm no fan of poisoning our youth and ourselves with sugar, but I do smile at such a puritanical legacy being so obscenely destroyed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanjuaro 64 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Chile started using these some years back. I honestly like them. We also did the mascot ban as well, so no Tony the Tiger, and even Pringles cans have a censored face

[–] JoeClu 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The question I have, are sales of these products down? Do these implementations work to reduce unhealthy consumption? Are hospitals and medical offices seeing less revenue? If they don't actually work, what will?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 52 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dear god, more than a third of Froot Loops and Frosted Flakes is sugar?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that's not the worst I have seen. Things like raisins are basically flavoured sugar.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (10 children)

But they're dried grapes and mostly without added sugar. We shouldn't need to live in a world where raisins are sold "now with less sugar". Humans spent hundreds of years cultivating eating grapes to be as sweet as they are...

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

Most raisin Bran cereal (including Kellogg's) coat the raisins in more sugar! https://www.seriouseats.com/cereal-eats-the-great-raisin-bran-off

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MrFlamey 52 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If nutrition labels bothers them so much, why not just make the cereal more nutritious and less full of shit? It's not hard to see that there is a solution that doesn't involve looking like a villain with an army of lawyers to fight a label.

[–] PickTheStick 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because changing your product, which specifically appeals to the target purchasers because of what you're changing, is going to make your product revenue take a nose dive? It should be obvious why they're fighting it with lawyers. Hopefully the laws are ironclad and upheld so Kellogg's gets their shit pushed in.

[–] CoffeeJunkie 10 points 2 years ago

But their products are known for being high fiber content, so unfortunately, they'll push their shit right back out. 😆

[–] Rilichu 6 points 2 years ago

Selling sugared cardboard is a pretty profitable market apparently

[–] baruchin 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This is one of the few things this mexican government has done right. I think this was copied from Chile, and should be copied in many countries including the U.S. F*ck those greedy obese factories.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If I'm seeing this right and the Mexican labels are just either-or "excessive" labels then check out the way the UK does it – the green/orange/red colouring makes it easy to tell how horrible something is at a glance

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aquinteros 23 points 2 years ago

they suffered in the Chilean market when the labels were introduced about 5 years ago... so it's no surprise they are going to war. in stead of ... you know, making healthier food

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Any food with ... more than 37 grams of added sugar in a 100-gram serving is also banned from including a mascot on its packaging

Damn, that's really good. Sounds a little bit like the plain packaging laws many countries have on cigarettes, which have proven to be extremely effective in the decade since they were first rolled out. It's obviously a bit more limited, but it's still a great move.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I saw this while in Mexico and really liked the idea. I was then immediately bummed out when realizing almost everything had that label on it and buying food without excess sugar and salt was a lot trickier.

[–] INeedMana 10 points 2 years ago

Awareness is the first step. It will take time for people to incentivize production of clean food

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not tricky. You're just in the wrong aisle. Get a delicious mango in Mexico.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can't survive on mangos alone for very long.

[–] JJROKCZ 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can easily live without cereal though, billions of people don’t eat it. Grab some still cut oats and make oatmeal for a healthy breakfast

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I suppose this thread is full of clean eating herbivores and I'm the only one that enjoys a packet of chips or cheese.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Wait, wait - does that mean we're going to lose the Coca-Cola polar bear?!

[Actually, they'll probably just release the Christmas version in a collectable polar-bear-shaped bottle to get around this... ]

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›