this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
235 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19237 readers
3363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer 75 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tuberville wants to blame democrats for this. He is the sole reason for this gap in military readiness.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 42 points 1 year ago

He wants to block military members from being able to family plan outside of the state of Alabama. Military members should not be subject to Alabama's medieval and draconian laws.

[–] Its_Always_420 26 points 1 year ago

Not the sole reason, he doesn't need to be on the armed services committee. The other Republicans could force him out at anytime.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Republicans always blame Democrats for everything, and their voters eat it up.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit 61 points 1 year ago

What a patriot, bravely refusing to do his goddamn job at the expense of his country's military. Surely there's no way this could backfire due to all the peace and lack of growing tension across the globe.

If nobody runs against him with the slogan "I'll fulfill the responsibilities of my position", that's a golden opportunity missed.

[–] who8mydamnoreos 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are Republicans so dead set on handicapping our military? They attack our economy, elections! Who side are they on?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Russia's side, it's not even a question. Don't forget these assholes went to Russia on July 4th not that long ago.

Who knows how much dirt they have on the republican party, especially since the rnc was hacked at the same time as the dnc, but only the dnc emails got released.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 3 points 1 year ago

Because the military stood against their coup.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How can 1 Senator hold up these military appointments?

[–] Telodzrum 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s just the tip of the spear. GOP Senate Leadership could change this, but they haven’t.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit 10 points 1 year ago

Less "tip of the spear", more "tip of the impacted bowel". We'll only have relief when he's dislodged and regular movements can resume.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 16 points 1 year ago

Because how the system was designed it was never an issue before. It's a committee and was always bipartisan. He made it political and extremely partisan. They can remove him though anytime.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without unanimous consent the process takes a lot longer. The current backlog of 300 nominations could be cleared in 1 vote with unanimous consent. Without that it's much slower. I don't know how slow, but I think each nomination ends up requiring multiple procedural votes like "when are we voting on this?" and so on.

[–] Prox 3 points 1 year ago

Even if each individual vote were to take the 3ish hours Tuberville claims, that's still 900 hours - over 100 working days / 20+ weeks of business just to clear this logjam he's created.

[–] dhork 6 points 1 year ago

As I understand it, the Senate's normal rules require each appointment to be discussed individually in the Senate. But the armed forces are so big now that they are typically discussed in committee at the same time. But since they haven't changed the actual rule yet, in order to batch all the nominations together they need unanimous consent of all senators.

So, Coach is using that as a weapon to get what he wants. Yeah, blame him if you want, but we should also blame the culture in the Senate where they continually rely on unanimous consent to get things done, rather than take the time to fix underlying rules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday stepped down from his role Monday, leaving the Navy, Army and Marine Corps with acting heads.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday slammed the holds, which are stretching into a fifth month with no resolution in sight.

“Because of this blanket hold, for the first time in the history of the Department of Defense, three of our military services are operating without Senate confirmed leaders,” Austin said during a relinquishment ceremony at the U.S.

“Smooth and swift transitions of confirmed leadership are central to the defense of the United States and to the full strength of the most lethal fighting force in history,” Austin said.

“And it’s time for the Senate to confirm all of our superbly qualified military nominees, including the 33rd chief of Naval Operations.”

“This particular stand is necessary because the Biden administration has shown that, unless held accountable, they will continue to violate the law and use our tax dollars to promote an extreme left wing agenda,” a statement from Tuberville’s office said.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think the most important paragraph was missed:

Three military services are now without Senate-confirmed heads for the first time in history, as Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) holds up the confirmations of more than 300 senior military officers to protest the Pentagon’s new abortion policy.

The tl;dr kind of makes it sound like the Senate Democrats are responsible for the holds. It's just one Republican and his anti-woke crusade.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God I hate these dumb fucks and idiots that can’t think with more than 2 brain cells. No long term planning or thinking. Just “oh my semi-ideological opponent wants it? Nah” Half of the US really went crazy because a black man was elected president. And they still haven’t gotten over it almost a decade later.

[–] newthrowaway20 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the seething rage some Republicans still feel over Nixon is anything to go by, they'll never get over this sleight against their being, and they'll continuously demand an additional pound of flesh in recompense every chance they get.

Because they weren't held accountable last time, it's 10 times worse this time. And if we let them get away with it again, there won't be another chance to hold them accountable because they'll destroy this country before that happens again. Hell, they're practically destroying it now.

[–] clif 2 points 1 year ago
[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why I think this bot is problematic.

[–] clif 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tldr omits the "why" so if you're not reading the article or not already aware :

Three military services are now without Senate-confirmed heads for the first time in history, as Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) holds up the confirmations of more than 300 senior military officers to protest the Pentagon’s new abortion policy.

Blocked by one single Republican

[–] tux 9 points 1 year ago

Let's be honest, he says it's about abortion. But he is really throwing a fit to try and get Space Command and Space Force headquarters in Alabama. As usual it's about the money that would bring to his district.