this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
123 points (80.9% liked)

You Should Know

32689 readers
377 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)

Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.

Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **

Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.

Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.

Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.

Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.

Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda
_MoveSwiftly
ja2
Rooki
Boozilla
123
YSK that YouTube shadow bans people (for a time) + implications to creators (monyet.cc)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/youshouldknow
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm having my comments I made the past few days receive zero engagements. It's not just me losing the early bird lottery too; my replies to a highly engaged comment has zero likes, while several comments immediately after me has double digits. It's nothing incendiary at all, just normal people's comments. But something just tripped the enigmatic AI and thenceforth I'm shadow banned.

Why you should know this?

Because YouTube is being a thought police between creators and their communities. It feels to me like 99.999% of creators on YouTube have no idea that this is happening, that honest to goodness people's engagements are never going to reach them on the platform; they're being silently silenced, by an AI that is figuratively a black box.

Look at this screenshot. If that's not damning evidence you tell me what is.

Imgur

The comment is straight up gone when viewing with a logged out tab. I'm definitely 100% shadow banned right now.
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whatuptrey 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s probably the owner of the channel that shadow banned you. As a creator, I have an option to “Hide User From Channel” any user I want, which is effectively shadow banning them.

[–] Shialac 7 points 1 year ago

Might also be a blacklisted word or something, there is sometimes really weird stuff on these

[–] kep 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was a hard post to read.

You're not shadowbanned from YouTube. The creator you're commenting on has simply "hid" you from their channel. Which ironically is a shadowban, just on a creator level.

The level of panic and outrage you've displayed here despite not having a clue as to how the mechanic you're discussing works is remarkable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can we tell if the creator shadowbanned or if YT did it? Sometimes my comments are hidden within seconds, and it's possible the creator is that fast, but I also suspect key word based filtering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's incorrect. Here is a decent video explaining it https://yewtu.be/watch?v=48ObNiT_hpM

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

More generally, it's an important reminder for content creators that their entire youtube career is built on quick sand.

You can be earning a decent living one day, the next day youtube can block your account or remove monetisation for no valid reason, and you're shit out of luck.

I mean, if you're making a lot of money on youtube, power to you. But you should be saving as much as possible for that day and have a back-up plan. It may never come, it may come tomorrow.

I cringed when one creator mentioned giving up on her degree to focus on youtube. I mean, sure she's making bank right now. But who knows how long that'll last.

[–] BrerChicken 11 points 1 year ago

I cringed when one creator mentioned giving up on her degree to focus on youtube. I mean, sure she's making bank right now. But who knows how long that'll last.

Unlike their YT career, that degree course will probably be there in five years. It'll be more expensive, but it's not gone forever or anything like that. For some opportunities you really have to strike while the iron is hot. For the record, I'm a HS teacher and I've had the "so you want to be a YouTuber for a living" conversation with countless students over the years, including with my own child. But for someone who's starting to get some traction, and wants to take time off of school to see where it leads them, I think it's an understandable move.

[–] DrQuint 4 points 1 year ago

You don't have to finish a degree before you're 25 to make use of it. Hell, plenty of people have two or even three degrees.

She does YouTube now, and she'll have huge financial security to finish the degree later. Hell, she'll have a degree that's probably up-to-date with her field at the time she'll actually use it, as opposed to getting one now and having to explain that her lack of work experience after getting it was due to "youtube".

[–] Carighan 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

AITA for thinking shadowbanning - as a concept - is actually a good thing?

It allows a sort of ban-on-probation. A way to isolate and observe in isolation whether someone exitibits ban-worthy behavior, while already protecting others from said behavior.

Yes, often banning would be preferrable. But I can also see why immediately going to hard ban is not warranted in many cases. Not everyone is an Alex Jones or a Donald Trump.

Now whether or not this specific case, or even Youtube's use of shadowbanning is good or bad... eh, different beast.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can see where you are coming from, though I must disagree with the implementation of this system. Firstly, it's applying a de facto punishment without ever informing the target about them being punished in the first place. For all we know they might not even be aware they should refrain from certain behaviors. Secondly, they either did deserve a punishment or they didn't. It doesn't need to be a "ban or not ban" situation, I'm all for more nuance (a warning, a short-term ban, you get the idea), but we shouldn't just put anyone on probation just in case, just to observe them in isolation first.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shadow Banning is very useful for spam bots. If you let them know they're banned, they'll just open a new account. But if YouTube keeps accepting their comments with a smile on its face before immediately tossing those comments into the shredder, it'll take some time before the bot figures out what's going on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Good point, I didn't consider the bot scenario. I can see it working here. Same thing with very obvious bad actors. What I oppose is using it as a regular punishment for regular users just crossing boundaries.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We're not talking about habeas corpus, we're talking about the dubious ability to post on a private website's comments section that has been widely regarded as a cesspool for over a decade. As someone else in this thread pointed out, this is being taken too seriously.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an age old system that was called "cave the trolls" at first. If you let a problematic user know he is banned, he will simply create a new account.

Isolating the troll however frees up moderator time spending, as it will usually take a good while for the person to realize he is in fact isolated.

They should add dummy upvotes and AI generate replies to these troll's comments too. That would make it even harder to realize.

[–] Carighan 2 points 1 year ago

True, now with AI we have the ability to make shadowbanned people not realize for a long time that something has happened to their account. And as you say, it's far more efficient than just banning them.

[–] TheDubz87 8 points 1 year ago

I don't doubt this given YouTube record with the creators themselves. YouTube is a slimy company.

[–] sagrotan 1 points 11 months ago

IMO at least the educational content of YouTube shouldn't be in private have entirely, too important today.