this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
737 points (98.6% liked)

News

27736 readers
5677 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 6 points 4 hours ago

Wells Fargo are thieves who steal from their customers. If you use them, you're about 15 years delayed in getting out. Security issue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

Who more qualified than a company that is banned from doing business in some parts of the US due to being caught defrauding customers?

[–] hark 101 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We should do an uno reverse and nationalize wells fargo.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They should have been nationalized in 2009 instead of receiving $25 billion bailout loan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

cool, at what interest rate? is it as bad as they charged us? with their regular bankruptcies, why did they get it at all? why did the american taxpayer take that level of risk for what I assume is no reward?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 minutes ago

Why don't you go find out for yourself. I already said they should have been privatized, I'm not here to do everyone's research for them.

[–] Fedizen 2 points 7 hours ago

How much of that was subsidized by the US government bailing out AIG?

[–] silicon 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Musk would just learn from them and open a bunch of bank accounts for everyone in the USA and have him control them all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

This is literally what he wants Twitter to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

we all know that's gonna happen anyway.

[–] [email protected] 241 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Reminder that Wells Fargo was caught opening millions of accounts without permission. This company should not be trusted with anything.

One of the rare cases where a company actually paid a huge $3 billion settlement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

And was banned from doing business in California

[–] ultranaut 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was one of those millions. Cost me way more than I got back in the settlement. Wells Fargo is a criminal organization.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck, I’m sorry that happened to you. It’s ridiculous that every victim of their fraud wasn’t at least made whole, but in addition to the people who should have gone to prison, you and all their victims honestly should have been given a modest fortune as proper restitution for these crimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

for justice? yes. for law? lolno.

[–] b3an 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is true. At the time it sounded so serious. Hand slaps and finger wags. It’s totally ok to cheat steal and lie if you are rich. Rules don’t apply to you. It’s completely mad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

yeah. laws are pretty wild.

but there are better ways to organize and run society, that don't rely on excuses and victim blaming to keep the poor from having solidarity with each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Hold on, what victim was being blamed in the comment you replied to?

Are you suggesting that Wells Fargo was a victim? That's literally the only way I can figure out to interpret this.

[–] 13igTyme 61 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It hardly made a dent, though.

Link

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Totally. It wasn’t close to being enough. The entire board should have been arrested for fraud, at the very least. At least it wasn’t some laughably low amount like we’re used to, I’m surprised it was even this high.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

3B is peanuts to them. I want to see fines that cripple a company's yearly profits so that, in lieu of criminal investigations and repercussions, the execs at the very least get punished by their board of directors and shareholders. There's only one language they understand. Another poster called it "operating costs". That's what we need to get rid of; punitive fines need to regain their punitive nature in order to be anywhere close to effective.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (21 children)

They don't need to privatize the USPS, they just need to lobby for the government's monopoly on post, established by act of Congress in the 1800s, to be removed. Then they can create a competing postal system, like Lysander Spooner did with the American Letter Mail Company. If they really think they can make a profitable service that competes with the USPS, let them try.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah and you think that the current federal government would allow the USPS to compete fairly with the private corporation that their buddy owns?

[–] WetBeardHairs 5 points 10 hours ago

They don't want to compete. That's not the point of any of this. They want to strip it for parts because Trump has rang the dinner bell for the vultures to feast on everything we have built in this country.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People, shall we plot to eliminate Wells Fargo as a banking entity? Sign up for a local credit union instead, perchance?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] makyo 58 points 1 day ago

Seriously FUCK these guys who think everything should be run like a business

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (4 children)

For anyone thinking it. I can confirm it feels great to close your wf account.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like a scheme hatched in 1887.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›