this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
724 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8766 readers
2661 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

Never have I been more pleased to see a foreign navies nuclear attack sub in my nations waters.

(odd times)

[–] [email protected] 43 points 17 hours ago

nuclear subs always give me gundam carrier ship vibes

[–] [email protected] 91 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€” Merci a la belle France πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ€πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

[–] [email protected] 14 points 14 hours ago

Vive la France!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 197 points 1 day ago (24 children)

This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

What's the point of these submarines if there aren't nukes on them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

To shoot at the ones with nukes on them?

[–] AnUnusualRelic 1 points 1 hour ago

There's a dismantled trebuchet on board.

[–] Furbag 1 points 2 hours ago

I guess they could use them as a regular strategic missile platform.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago

Regardless, it's presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

Though I'd be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

They don't need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It's not like fascists can't find a casus belli. Putin was "restoring Russian glory" or some such. Trump would be "finishing the American Revolution" or some other bullshit.

Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

Just please, don't harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don't close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime's enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

I mean, they're not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

We don't know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Also a great and well deserved middle finger to Australia

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί