this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
633 points (99.2% liked)

News

25794 readers
6059 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration plans to revoke temporary legal status for 240,000 Ukrainians who fled Russia’s war, fast-tracking them for deportation.

The move is part of a broader effort to strip protections from 1.8 million migrants admitted under Biden’s humanitarian parole programs.

Trump’s policies also target 530,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Legal challenges are mounting, as affected individuals face uncertain futures. Advocates warn that even U.S. allies, such as Afghans who assisted the military, are now at risk of detention and deportation.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Professorozone 22 points 6 hours ago

I can't believe the cruelty. I'm just... But... No words.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 hours ago

Make America satanic again.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 19 points 7 hours ago

What the fuck

[–] notsoshaihulud 3 points 4 hours ago

I thought he wasn’t into DEI. Europeans were underrepresented among the deportees, now trump’s promoting equity there.

(/s)

[–] TomMasz 88 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Tell me Trump is a Russian asset without saying he's a Russian asset.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 232 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (8 children)

Sometimes I feel like I was the only one who remembered that this is what it was like the last time he was in office. Just every day some fresh hell, like a treadmill of anger and grief until the only real reason to protest is so that they don't drive you permanently numb.

The scope of this new order is hard to contemplate. 0.77 million people who are being shown the door today. Our colossus is in need of a new credo.

“Give me your billionaires, your oligarchs, Your hunched war criminals yearning for the Lolita Express, The wretched refuse of your banking sectors. Send these, the landlords, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden arches!"

Edit to add: I know that it is currently only a plan. I do not need to bicker with anyone about this.

[–] kava 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes I feel like I was the only one who remembered that this is what it was like the last time he was in office

I feel like it's worse this time. Darker. We didn't have the Ukraine or Israeli war. We didn't have perverse AI videos like the Gaza video with a giant golden Trump statue.

2016 was the rise of Trump. Right now we are in the age of Trump. Trump is steadily increasing his power and I believe fairly soon he will be able to more or less unilaterally control the federal government as he continues his purges.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago

It's far, far worse this time.

Last go around sure, there would be a fucked up tweet almost every day, but much fewer actual changes. Yeah Trump did some fucked up shit over those 4 years, but he's done more fucked up shit in the last month than in that whole term.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That is a large amount of people being sent back to a country where there is a good possibility that they will be killed. The country that is throwing them out (the US) has a lot of sympathetic people to their cause...and a lot of easily accessible guns.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (10 children)

Im not American so I probably didn't see a lot of this but my lasting impression was a lot of blustering and shit slinging but no real action or substance. Like everything he tried or promised either didn't get done or was half arsed. Basically i saw it as incompetence and damage through inaction rather than the malicious active damage he is doing now.

[–] brucethemoose 55 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You are partially right. For US Presidents, implementing policy is much harder than declaring it, something IIRC Bush and Obama echoed.

But on top of that, Trump had a lot of guardrails in the first term, a lot of old school Republicans and “regular” cabinet that watered down whatever ideas he had.

That is no longer the case. It's only loyalists egging each other on now. And there’s already a lot more bite, it’s just so much that it’s hard to process.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

He did a huge amount of harm to our government. Not quite like this time, where most of what he is doing is outright illegal and is essentially a soft coup, but really bad nonetheless - just mostly aimed at making him money and getting/keeping political power instead of destryoying the country. Much of that was outright illegal, but a lot of it was just breaches of "norms" and "decorum".

I literally can't fit it all into one comment, its so much and such a convoluted web of schemes and lies and crimes and support from other politicians/lawyers/the media. And every day was something new. I followed all the legal cases relating to his admin back in the first term - it was hard to keep up with even while it was all happening. Much of the reason he was never charged or indicted for so much of what he did is that you can't criminally indict a sitting president.

The Mueller investigation into the Trump administration's conduct with Russian political operatives found that he more than likely illegally colluded with Russia to the detriment of the US and to defraud and disenfranchise voters, but literally couldn't charge Trump since he was a sitting president - hoping instead that someone would pick up the investigation when he could be charged. It is notable that that investigation produced 37 indictments and 7 convictions/guilty pleas, referred 14 more cases to DoJ for prosecution, and recovered like $48M in misappropriated government funds (the investigation cost $32M, so it was actually profitable). So, this investigation couldn't prosecute Trump, but 34 people in his administration were indicted and the findings of the report suggested they would have prosecuted Trump if they were legally allowed to. That says all you need to know, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It drove me crazy how much people acted like the Mueller investigation exonerated Trump completely. It absolutely did not and everyone just dropped the topic after it came out. Even Rachel Maddow who seemed to be desperately chasing her Woodward and Bernstein moment with her coverage of the investigation seemed to stop talking about the investigation as soon as the report came out as if there wasn't anything to talk about, even though a bunch of Trump allies were charged and convicted for engaging in secret dealings with agents related to Russia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Not being able to indict a sitting president is the biggest bullshit policy of all time. Nobody should be above the law, especially the people in power.

[–] aesthelete 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It was also only based upon a DOJ memo of some sorts for a long time. The "Supreme Court"'s recent decision though makes it seem like the only legal remedy for an active criminal president is to impeach and then convict and remove them first.

[–] Fisherman75 4 points 5 hours ago

This becomes what russian hegemonic law looks like in the US. The DOJ does whatever the Kremlin wants or needs on this, a sharp departure from other administrations or even other jurisdictions such as blue states. We become a patchwork of neomedieval geoplitical clashes constantly caught in between the jurisprudential spheres of entirely conflicting global and financial agendas. Individual politicians and public servants serving throughout the government become agents of different global factions and different hegemonies and the people are continually subjected not just to unstable and unreliable patterns of legal text and texts indicating some kind of public policy but to endlessly shifting pretext of every type to the jurisprudence and statecraft themselves. The federal government has been collapsing for a while but this just makes it faster than it has been.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mhague 58 points 9 hours ago (12 children)
[–] PurpleTentacle 41 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

He's living proof that time travel into the past is never going to get invented ... likely because he cut most science funding.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Best comment I have read in quite a long time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goodmorningsunshine 5 points 6 hours ago

The universe isn't benevolent

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just by a few inches... If even that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tbh, the shot looks like it would've blown the back of his dome off if he hadn't done his classic chicken head jerk at the last possible second, probably right as the shooter was pulling the trigger. Instead, it grazed his ear. Missed him by literally half a second.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Should have gone for the heart; I don't think further damaging the brain would have much effect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

It would have just bounced off the lump of coal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

What heart? For real, though, even a shallow angle impact here probably would've been catastrophic. The occipital lobe and brain stem control a lot of the very fundamental functions of continuing to be alive. It's nuts how narrowly Trump avoided getting a game over screen.

Though, yeah, a center of mass shot probably would have been all she wrote for Trump. My guess is that the shooter had a very, very narrow line of sight on Trump, and probably only had the head as an option. That's likely why a few other people were injured or killed in the attempt; IIRC they were inadvertently between Trump and the shooter.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Buffalox 45 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (49 children)

Imagine there are still people who chose to go to USA voluntarily?

Will Americans really still just look on and do nothing while the Trump administration is tearing the country apart?

[–] frog_brawler 20 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

There are a lot of protests going on right now - the news isn't covering it.

[–] aesthelete 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the legal, standing around with signs protest is going to have to have its toothier cousin (the violent riot) starting up again alongside it if we want anything to change. They already painted the 2020 protests as "burning the cities down" despite them being >90% peaceful. We might as well -- to reference Kendrick Lamar's lyrics -- fuck being rational and give em what they asked for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
[–] shiroininja 19 points 10 hours ago

WHAT THE FUCK. That is all

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›