Samsung is basically all Korean?
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
103 points (91.9% liked)
Android
29137 readers
376 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Something chinese (lol)
You already own it. You aren't doing Apple any favors by continuing to own it and you're not hurting them by getting rid of it.
False. You are hurting them by not providing them a recurring revenue and stream of your data.
What "recurring revenue stream" are you referring to? And what data?
OP mentioned store or inapp purchases plus cloud subscription.
And ALL data, noone knows what apple is doing with it.
OP mentioned store or inapp purchases plus cloud subscription.
I mean they could simply...stop doing that?
noone knows what apple is doing with it
I assume nothing until proven otherwise, considering we know for a fact that any other device is going to be sending a plethora of data for Google to monetize.
Another comment mentioned GrapheneOS.
Even Graphene is nigh-unusable without Google services.
I use GrapheneOS without Google services and the only issue I have to work around is Slack notifications. Everything else is fantastic.
For the phone itself I would say fairphone, but another option is buying a second hand android and installing a custom rom, No money given to the owner company.
Anything second-hand, really.
Devices
- Fairphone 5 (Netherlands)
- OS: LineageOS, CalyxOS
- Or buy it new from iode (France), they also sell other phones as well
- Shiftphone 8 (Germany)
- Is the only Android phone with hardware kill switches (for mic and camera)
- Working on CalyxOS and LineageOS support
For OS comparission
Such a bummer that I can’t use one here in the US.
I have the Fairphone form iode with their OS on it. Best phone I had so far and the System ist pretty much set up the way I like it out if the box.
I have a Fairphone 5 and am very satisfied with it. Would definitely recommend
For OS comparission
It's worth noting that graphene doesn't have automatic calls recording, and the Devs have been weirdly aggressive about deleting and banning people that ask for it.
Maybe because... automatically recording calls is literally illegal in some places around the world? It should probably be user choice to opt in to that so it wouldn't be on by default. And then, if you have it on while travelling, you could forget and break the law when going through a jurisdiction that does not allow it. Better to explicitly allow for each call, like it does currently.
Graphene OS just has weirdly aggressive devs.
I guess it's very "on brand" for the devs of a privacy project to be extremely paranoid.
isn't it more security focused than privacy?
I use GrapheneOS and have reviewed a lot of the documentation in the OS and built in apps. They like to pair the words privacy and security together in that documentation. The info sheet for the chromium degoogled browser they developed called Vanadium is very focused on both aspects. I personally think the two concepts go hand in hand.
Its also the first time I've used a non-firefox type of browser in almost a decade. It feels weird, but they are good at describing why it's more secure in GrapheneOS due to its superior ability to maintain app sandboxes, which is a big reason I use the OS. Full control over what apps can see on my device.
Used pixel, put grapheneos on it.
Helps prevent e-waste and youll end up with a fully functioning phone
Yes, used is the way to go to be the most socially and anti-capitalist conscious.
This is a very good option
Yep buying used is the route to go to not directly source a company with new revenue.
Maybe Jolla with SailfishOS would be the best bet.
They had significant Russian funding last I knew. Has that changed?
Maybe Fairphone (Netherlands) with /e/OS (Google free Android from France).
Not being stupid here, but: do you need to? I completely understand and support the anger, but what in-app purchases are you making and can't you stop making them? You can switch to the free iCloud account (so they don't get money) and download/delete your content so they don't have access to it.
I think your data being used is the big one, but it leads down a big privacy hole; you'll have to decide how far you want you take that.
I'm just wondering if you'll end up giving more money to them by buying a new phone, Rather than sticking with your current phone, stopping in-app purchases, deleting iCloud, and installing privacy protection.
Right. Purchasing new sends money to the ultra rich somewhere in the world.
Samsung is from South Korea, and their flagships are on par with iPhones.
if your in the EU give fairphone a look, over 7 years of updates promised for the fairphone 5 in addition to being one of the more repairable phones out there
Nothing Phone is British, if I remember correctly
If you want a phone that can run a degoogled rom without voiding warranty and don’t mind some American parts Fairphone
If you don’t care about warranty or some American parts you have a lot of choices. Samsung is Korean, Sony Xperia is Japanese, etc
If you want a phone that has absolutely no American parts (which means avoiding the Qualcomm chips in the above phones) you are limited to Chinese phones and really to Huawei. Xiaomi still uses some Qualcomm chips. This will make using western apps a bit of a chore though as they will have to be sideloaded, they won’t be available through the huawei appgallery and the kirin chips don’t support 5g. These are degoogled though. I don’t think you’re in the us based on your post but just in case you are these won’t work in the USA, carriers may not activate them bc sanctions
Qualcomm is hard to get around for cellular modems but their stranglehold is finally starting to get broken. Mediatek (Taiwan), Samsung (Korea), Huawei (China), etc are making cellular modem ics now. Even within America apple finally released theirs with the newest iphone that just released the other day
Ulefone is a great option if you don't care about security updates and want to beat something to death with your phone.
I dropped my power armor 13 while getting out of my car one day and left a half-dollar sized dent in my door frame.
I’m unfamiliar but some brief searching shows they use kigen for sim handling and mediatek for processor/modem so it appears they also have little to no American parts, though I’m not sure of this
If you want to cost a company money, calling and talking to a person is a big expense for any company.
Can we be real for a minute?
The kind of companies involved in android may have started in the US, but they're international.
Buy a Samsung, it isn't like it only puts taxes into one country's coffers. Same with Google, which is headquartered in the US, but their phones aren't actually made here. So you skip pixel devices, and feel all good about it, but if you actually get enough people boycotting them, it isn't the us that takes the hit. It won't even hit the pockets of the shareholders.
Who would take the hit is the people at the bottom, making the hardware, and that's going to be whatever country has people willing/forced to work for bare minimum.
Some things, yeah, you can completely boycott and only US companies take the hit, which still isn't really going to hit a big enough company because most of them are an international conglomerate's property anyway. It might fuck over something like Arizona Iced Tea since that's still a family owned company. But anything that's publicly traded? Nah, it's theater unless you boycott everything that conglomerate owns, and it ain't like any of the nestle botcotts have hurt their bottom line in the decade or so it's been going.
Phones though? There's nothing you can buy that isn't going to enrich Google in one way or another, at least indirectly. You can get close. Pine phones, fairphone, stuff like that where you have the ability to cut them out. But even going with a pixel and cutting google out from out still has feedback effect into Google's influence via the secondary market keeping their brand with higher values, making their hardware look better than it is.
I get it, the shit is stirring, and you want to slap back.
But the only real way to slap back for real is to abandon smart phones. Some of those, android free, you can cut things down and maybe avoid sending funds into us coffers. LG dumb phones still exist on the secondary market, and they were decent. So I don't doubt there's other brands out there making phones that are decoupled enough that it might only be pennies instead of dollars.
I think you might be missing a few things.
First, sure there's probably some minor feedback but really, outside of luxury goods (which neither Apple or Google are at this point) more customers is seen as better by investors/the market.
Yes, the market is all theatre but amazingly, it's theatrics to which a great deal of attention is paid. The more share prices of magnificent 7 stocks drop, the more that affects those who have actual power and influence.
Heck, forget abandoning smartphones, living in a cave would be the ultimate way to not contribute to America. But most folks want to balance their morals with a functional life, which for many includes a smartphone.
If you want to slap back, instead of trying desperately to convince maybe a handful of folks to switch to dumb phones over tarrifs, much better to help a lot of people make incremental but helpful changes.
I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.
Well, maybe that the conglomeration of everything across the world into the hands of oligarchs means that tariffs are the lesser problem, but even that, I ain't got patience to convince people of.
I'm just rambling and venting a little
Every comment can be argued to be an attempt to try to convince people of a certain viewpoint.
Including this one pointing out the comment posted was a long laid out argument trying to change someone's perspective of current events. ha
Sure, but intent does matter.
As does the structure of the comment/conversation.
For me, if I'm trying to convince someone as the intent, I go about it different than if I'm expressing my thoughts/opinions and if it ends up convincing them, that's okay, but it's also okay if it doesn't.
Probably a Huawei.