this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
487 points (98.0% liked)

memes

12308 readers
3900 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 26 minutes ago

That is a bank rush. It's how banks die if enough people do it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Hmm, are you still covered by the FDIC if you deliberately engineer a bank failure? Let's say all of Bank of America's customers decided that they just really wanted to fuck BoA hard. So they arrange to all demand the complete liquidations of their accounts, all at once. Or maybe people arrange a series of bank failures as part of some broader political movement. But hypothetically, if a group of people deliberately caused their bank to fail, would their deposits still be FDIC-insured? In other words, if you deliberately arrange a bank run, will you still be covered by FDIC insurance?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It'd be hard to prove a single participant. An organizer, maybe? But if you just heard everybody's doing a bank run on the 20th and you're scared of the stability of your bank, so you decide to withdraw your money on the 19th so you can put it into another bank, that seems reasonable.

(i know nothing about digital transfers between banks)

[–] bestagon 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It exists to cover bank runs and it is your money. There is nothing wrong with wanting your money in any given moment. That’s just my take though, I’m not a lawyer.

I think it’d basically defeat its preventative purpose though if a story got out that people weren’t covered, even in an engineered bank run. What if you’re not in on the plot? What if it happens tomorrow at your bank? Are you just fucked too? Better withdraw all your money to be safe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

What a potentially powerful tool of protest. Imagine if you got a movement of a few million people. They all move to a target bank. A few months later, they all demand their full account liquidation. Then you move on to the next megabank. One by one, drop them like flies.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This made me recall an odd bank related situation that happened to me a few weeks ago, and which I am still a bit perplexed by.

Due to a couple of things coming up, I needed to stock up on some bills of various denominations. Nothing all that crazy, in my opinion, 20 $1 bills, 20 $5 bills, stuff like that, a few hundred dollars at most. Where else do you get bills like that? The bank, I assumed.

When I got up to the teller, I explained that I needed to pull out X amount from my account, and I that I needed specific number of each denomination. She looked at me like I was asking something completely unheard of. She even told me, I don't think I have the money for that as she shuffled through some drawers.

Eventually she asked another teller who told her she'd have to go to the central terminal (I don't recall the actual name they used) and make a request for each denomination. So the teller walked across the back of the bank to a computer that looked like it was from the 80s. After about 10 minutes of typing, with multiple people helping her, 2 people came out from a room, walked over to a floor vault and opened it. While one pulled out the cash I requested, the other stood guard. It was surreal. They counted the money twice, the teller counted the money twice, and then finally came back to the counter and gave me the deposit. She seemed to be barely holding back her level of irritation at me.

All that for just a few hundred dollars in cash. It had me really wondering if I was mistaken about the role and services provided by banks and whether I was out of line for asking to receive specific denominations. Was I supposed to leave a tip or something?

[–] Smokeydope 33 points 12 hours ago

Sounds like either your bank is a local one struggling on business or its run by really incompetent management who failed to properly stock up the tellers. As them to pull out some 2$ bills next time everyone likes those

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Infinite money glitch.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You: buys a digital thing from an online store

Store: takes your money right away with no waiting time

You: Decide you don't want it anymore, too expensive to renew

Store: okay, you'll get your money back in 5 to 10 business days

[–] [email protected] 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think the store takes your money right away? They mark it paid when the transaction starts not when they receive the money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Yes that's correct, I've worked in the field, when you place an order online there's a workflow triggered in the background between your bank, the vendor and visa/Mastercard in the case of credit cards. When you place the order, an authorization is placed on the card, at that stage it goes through a few checks (balance, fraud checks, creation of the transaction ID, etc). If it's successful, it'll move to a pending status, at this point it's just an authorization, during this time the company will prepare your order for shipping. Once it ships, the authorisation gets converted to a settlement, which is when money actually starts getting transferred. Even then it'll take a few more days for the banks to actually process the transaction before the vendor can refund it.

Of course, this is all just the way it's done, I'm not saying it's the right one. Companies use this process because it's nice and safe, guarantees you won't be losing money through the cracks, but nothing would stop them from just refunding before this whole transaction shenanigans is fine, they just take more risk.

[–] Matticus 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lol imagine anyone having 50k

[–] Agent641 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I have 50k in my hand right now.

It even has a cool picture of Ho Chi Minh on it

[–] rob_t_firefly 1 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

Thank you for telling us about how much dong you're holding.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

Uncle Ho always was a wily one.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And that is why it's called a checking account. It's only there for checking.

[–] Lawnman23 18 points 16 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 17 hours ago

Of course, sir. Your 45 thousand will be deposited after we take the service fee

[–] db2 107 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

And next time have it when asked or we'll do this again.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can easily do a same-day wire transfer of this amount. Technically there's no limit on the size of wire transfers. There's probably a point where the bank will start asking questions, but car / mortgage down-payment sized transfers aren't an issue.

But, yeah, I bet cash withdrawals are another ballgame. Not least because the bank probably doesn't actually keep that much cash in typical customer-facing locations.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

What the heck is that giant vault for if they ain't got comically large sacks of money and so many coins, they cause an avalanche when opening the door?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The "large vault" you're referring to is either old enough to predate the internet or full of safe deposit boxes for rent.

Even busy bank branches probably only need a vault the size of an armoire these days. People just don't use much cash.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, agreed. Though, I'll point out that many, many buildings (and people) easily predate the internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Exactly, that's why they're still around. They still haven't been used at their intended scale since before most working adults had left home.

If anyone else wants to feel old, MySpace is old enough to drink and the iPhone can vote. College graduates have never seen someone type on a t9.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually a laundry storage facility.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

US cash is mostly cotton IIRC

[–] Katana314 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Is there not a security concern of doing basic checks before handing out cash?

For instance, elderly woman gets a text message telling her the IRS needs $50k cash or they’ll take her house. The bank says they need a few days, she complains that the IRS wants it now…and then they help explain that it’s likely a scam.

[–] Serinus 2 points 6 hours ago

Yes, typically. I don't know if that trumps "the bank has to give you your money when you ask for your money."

[–] ch00f 11 points 16 hours ago
[–] saltesc 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I struggle to understand what modern insurance companies actually exist for, apart from money people donating money to them for nothing in return.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Insurance prevents people from hoarding money that they would need in case of a (personal) disaster to rebuild/repair/re-purchase their losses. If you know insurance will cover your house if it ever burns down, you spend the money, which helps the economy.

[–] LaLuzDelSol 14 points 16 hours ago

Huh? Most people don't have enough cash to pay off their home, let alone save up enough to be able to buy a backup home. That's what insurance is for- it protects you from expenses that would be ruinous if you had to pay them out of pocket. The insurance company takes in more than it pays out, but it's worth it for home insurance (and health insurance in the good old US of A). It's why buying insurance on some $100 tech thing is always a ripoff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

Even if someone worked very diligently to save money, it would take a whole lot to save enough to be able to afford an entire second house.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Some are mandated, like auto insurance. Some are because your relative loss from buying insurance is waaaaaaaay less than your loss from an actual disaster. I for one don't mind paying (and this is an example, lol, like I can afford a home in my area) $200k over 40 years when the cost to rebuild my home after a fire, flood, hurricane, tornado, earthquake, or godzilla would be >$400k.

Health insurance is the real head scratcher. It's almost a guarantee that you'll need it at some point. Pet insurance falls under this as well. A friend was telling me that it was a no brainer unless you're the type to shoot the dog as soon as it gets mildly sick. It's something along the lines of $40 a month, which means you're paying $480 a year, or maybe $4,800-$9,600 over the 10-20 year lifespan of the dog (it's a dog in this example because my fingers like the d more than the c). You know how much a single emergency with a dog can cost? Probably the entire amount you'd pay over a 10 year life span. If it is a longer problem, it balloons even more. And, importantly, right now pet insurance is where health insurance was at years ago, where they didn't scratch out your eyeballs over every payment. It may take that turn here soon, once the industry is more established. That's what my buddy actually wants to do, is review cases for pet insurance companies. I might have to toss him out of the car one day if it gets to the point of our human health insurance.

[–] Maggoty 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I might have to toss him out of the car one day if it gets to the point of our human health insurance.

Just take him for a walk...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

His spouse might have a problem with that, or I'd already have the leash ready.

[–] Agrivar 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

(it's a dog in this example because my fingers like the d more than the c)

Come again?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

See, if I liked the c more than the d, I would be using a cat as an example. You know... typing? My fingers like the d, which is on the home keys, more than the c, which is a downwards reach.

[–] Serinus 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't one you can dig yourself out of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

Yeah, let's throw this poor person a bone already so that they do not have to dig their buried one up.

[–] EvacuateSoul 2 points 14 hours ago

This stopped me in my tracks also lmao. I was wondering how you get vet bills from playing red rocket.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] IndustryStandard 4 points 18 hours ago

Except when you need the insurance it is gambling whether you get it.