this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
340 points (98.6% liked)

politics

20340 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

On a recent episode of "On With Kara Swisher," guests including economists Mariana Mazzucato, Paul Krugman, and Oren Cass tore into Elon Musk for his hypocrisy over government subsidies.

They highlighted that Tesla received nearly $5 billion by 2015 and that Tesla and SpaceX have benefited from over $20 billion in federal contracts, accusing Musk of attacking state-funded support while benefiting from it.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaQueue 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Surely these strongly worded articles will stop him

[–] paraphrand 8 points 2 days ago

I wasn’t aware of the numbers. Many were not.

People should hear the numbers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I thought he was out of control, but I wasn't aware he had been slammed.

[–] Placebonickname 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would not be surprised to find out that MUSK has received just as much money as his firings projected to save during his time at DOGE. I’m not even sure that he is saving money, why? Cause no one did a budget office type evaluation of the situation before Musk jumped in and started to stir shit up. He just started firing people like a maniac.

I hope someone out there determines that Musk is a national threat and they have him arrested in the same way we locked up KSM for years without trail.

[–] Blue_Morpho 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 2 days ago

Khaleid Sheik Mohammed, iirc

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

“Slamming” became a stale trope once it became obvious that you can’t shame the shameless.

Stop trying to simply call out fascists. Start telling anti-fascists what to do about them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Just stopping the suppression of anti-facism would go a long way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

While I get the sentiment, these are the opinions of economists. I don't think they have any idea what to do to actually stop fascists.

I think at best, reporters would be able to interview anti-fascists for what we should do. I just doubt they have a stable of anti-fascists to call on for interviews.

I'm not entirely sure who they would call upon. So I can't make any real recommendations, either.

[–] Zachariah 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 6 points 2 days ago

Musk SLAMMED! . . awesome . . where?

On a recent episode of "On With Kara Swisher,"

Uhhhhh . . . I dont' know what that is.

Oh well.

[–] Machinist 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Make noise b-boys!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Name calling and finger wagging will do nothing as he is just plundering it. I mean if you had a gang of burglars so brazen they got a caravan of moving trucks and literally just packed EVERYTHING from several homes in broad daylight. Calling them out and having them smile at you condescendingly at best will do nothing. They need to be arrested and spend the rest of their damn lives in prison.

For Musk's baby faced cronies they not only need to spend a minimum of 30 years behind bars, but if they are released they are not allowed to work in anything other than menial labor and not to touch any computer or electronic device that is not preprogrammed for a very specific task (such as coffeemakers or toasters) and any violation of those rules will result in them being returned to prison permanently.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Slammed! Destroyed! Decimated!

I'm tired of the news, man.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Oh please, I doubt Musk could suck his way out of a gas station bathroom. He's got a lot of help doing the sucking here, and every one of them should go down for aiding and abetting this government sack-draining.

[–] makyo 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He should face a jury for these crimes. And when he doesn't, what do the powers that be think is going to happen when the rest of us are tired of seeing this shit happen with no justice?

[–] xc2215x 1 points 2 days ago

As he should be.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

I love that in the thread right before this one for me someone was mocking the use of words like "slam" in news.