this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
108 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

16485 readers
50 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Smart move by the new owner, anything else would have looked out of touch

[–] Ensign_Crab 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I kind of expected this. The company didn't choose to be dicks about it in the first place, and it's not like Benchy was even a commercial product to begin with. It was cutesy branding that only had a no-derivatives license because the original author was concerned about preserving its utility as a benchmark. But md5 will already do that particular trick if it's really necessary.

The new owner gained nothing by keeping the more stringent license, and had more to gain in goodwill by releasing it to the public domain.

[–] dual_sport_dork 5 points 4 days ago

That, and the inevitable avalanche of community recreations of the basic shape that followed threatened to doom the original to irrelevance anyway.

Trying to tell 3D printing and CAD nerds you can't make [object] is a fool's errand, because enough people with time on their hands will just reverse engineer your [object], possibly improve upon it in the process, and post it everywhere to be given away.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Not being mean spirited, but I suspect NTI's lawyers looked at it and decided that the benchy wasn't worth trying to defend in court. That horse had left the barn long ago. And it will buy some good will for at least a little while.

[–] ArtVandelay 5 points 4 days ago

From NTI's article:

"In January 2025, rumors surfaced that remixes of 3DBenchy were being removed from Printables due to the enforcement of the original license. However, NTI did not initiate this action. Prusa Research, the company behind Printables, later confirmed that a third-party report - not NTI - prompted the enforcement. NTI clarified it had not sought to remove downloads or derivatives of the model and had taken no legal action in this regard."

https://www.nti-group.com/home/information/news/3dbenchy/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've been doing prints for probably 10+ years now and have yet to make one of these. Cute as it is I never quite got why that became the defacto standard test.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because it's really effective at diagnosing many issues, and it takes about 10 grams of filament to print.

[–] Ensign_Crab 11 points 5 days ago

And it's cute.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Link was down but this release from NTI has similar info: https://www.nti-group.com/home/information/news/3dbenchy/

[–] riodoro1 3 points 5 days ago
[–] RegalPotoo 2 points 5 days ago

Please tell me they struck a deal with Zack