this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
192 points (97.1% liked)

World News

40546 readers
3433 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Support for Germany’s far-right AfD is surging among young men, driven by concerns over immigration, conservative values, and distrust of mainstream politics.

A Pew study found 26% of German men view AfD positively, compared to 11% of women.

Social media, particularly TikTok, has helped spread its message. Some young supporters reject accusations of extremism, while others openly embrace far-right views.

Analysts warn that if mainstream parties ease their opposition to the AfD, it could become Germany’s dominant right-wing party.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

A desperate belief that they are impoverished because they need to compete with an ethnic out group and a belief that the out group is taking their shit, murdering them, and stealing/raping their women.

Even though its largely due to capitalism and technologically induced paranoia & loneliness.

[–] galanthus 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Doomsider 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Because they are stupid and easily influenced by propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Stupid ? All youngsters all around the world are stupid then.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 3 hours ago

They kind of are though. There's a reason the word Sophomore exists and is used to describe students multiple times in their education career.

(Historically it means wise fool or; conceited and overconfident of knowledge but poorly informed and immature)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, you got it!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we please talk about how there is no active real left wing in any country?

Like sure the right wins when there is no real opposition.

I keep feeling like I've failed miserably as a person for not doing more. And I have no idea what should I be doing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is nothing you can/could do. The endless war against intelligence and focus on just believing what some screaming asshole says on talk radio, combined with the dawn of the internet being weaponized to spread that brain rot, and here you go. Maybe if you can go back in time and murder Ronald Reagan before capitalism gets so out of hand that they can buy the government ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

What about doing my own content? Podcasts, screaming asshole youtubes and whatnot? I can't speak very well, much less write, but I can... do something

[–] demizerone 28 points 1 day ago

It seems that every 80 years or so humanity has to learn a hard lesson over and over again.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm gonna go with

  1. Angry without a culprit
  2. Reduced critical thought

Both of those.

[–] NateNate60 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want to add a third thing to this list:

  1. Feeling left behind by mainstream political parties.

The parties in power surely pay lip service to the issues that concern the young but very rarely do they actually do anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think there are obviously a lot of reasons this is happening, we all know it’s not so simple a thing to explain.

But I think it can mostly just be boiled down to general discontent—there is a feeling all over the world that is vague and seemingly in everyone. It’s disenfranchisement. It’s a system that doesn’t prioritize us or even consider us. We serve the system, and the exploitation for the benefit of the global system has become so acute that it’s hitting everyone.

But people just cannot conceive of big problems like this. It always has to be something specific, so their more personal fears and biases are being exploited by the most advanced conditioning and manipulation system ever created.

We are mico-conditioned. We are exploited in new and exciting and previously unthinkable ways. We are so minutely controlled that we aren’t even in control of our own feelings most of the time. We have our moods changed for companies to profit or to weaken us to whatever it is their product “fixes.”

We can dig down into so much minutiae about the different things, but that’s like dividing Infinity over and over and over ad Infinitum. But we need to stop subdividing and sub-subdividing because that only serves to divide us—which is exactly the tactic used to exploit our vague anger. We need to instead zoom way out and see that this system is taking us down with the world it’s destroying. We all feel it, we all feel the system breaking down. But that uneasiness is given a face and a name in immigrants, or whatever is helpful.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine 6 points 22 hours ago

I gotta say, watching them destroy the world is not making me a fan of young men.

[–] Coreidan 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There was a time that I thought the world hated nazis. I realize now it was only hitler the world didn’t like. It turns out they actually love Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking about this the other day, and came to some conclusions. This is a copy-paste of a comment I made in another thread:

I don’t know much about the history of anti-Semitism in Europe (so anyone feel free to correct me or add more info), but what I’ve been thinking is that the cause/origin of anti-Semitism is no different from the anti-immigrant panic from today. They both come down to people from a “foreign” or at least different culture coming into a society and getting jobs or opening business. It just so happens that now those foreign people are more diverse, whereas before (centuries ago in Europe) they were mostly Jewish.

This tells me we have learned nothing from our past except for the most surface level details. We learned that anti-Semitism is bad and beat people over the head with it, but we never properly addressed the roots of it, and so now the same thing is repeating but for different groups of people. It’s the same sort of thing as when it is said that “people nowadays are more open minded”, when the reality is simply that they were taught to be okay (or not) with certain things; but the bigoted though process has not really gone away.

[–] shalafi 5 points 18 hours ago

The Jew hate originally stemmed from the fact that they could loan money and charge interest, which Christians found to be a sin (usury). Well, somebody has to handle banking or the economy crashes. Made them perfect scapegoats.

"I must be suffering because the Jews stole my money!"

Then it gets worse. Jews had strict rules about cleanliness, you can find many of them in the Bible. Guess who did and didn't get hit with plague rats. Guess who got the blame.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Coreidan 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That is what I used to think too. Turns out the world loves losers. It was only hitler they didn’t like.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

He was an imminent threat to comfortable and familiar ways of life of the rich. Had he not been a threat to them and their interests, we would not have gone to war with him.

Likewise anyone else on the current world stage who is obnoxious, outrageous, egregious or other adjectives of that ilk.

Sure, he was also a threat to the comfort and happiness of people other than the rich, and hey, the fact that fascism is legitimately terrible is an excellent propaganda point, but that only made it easier to recruit those less well-off to go fight the battles of the rich.

And then there's that a significant part of the reason people outside of Germany hated him is because he was foreign. Nothing more, nothing less. Pick any country, and if he'd been one of their own instead, the haters would have liked him just fine and would have been "Roman saluting" just like the Germans did.

(Yes, I know he was an Austrian accepted by Germans. Call that the exception that proves the rule. Countries further away couldn't care less. He was still foreign to them.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rottingleaf 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny that this somehow was obvious for me since childhood. One of the perks of being autistic is that reading the same mainstream narrative texts you understand them differently.

The world loves those enforcing rules, because they have to be strong for that, and the world loves those breaking rules, because if today they are making a challenge, tomorrow they might become even stronger. Humans follow strength. So a new challenger of existing order is loved, a yesterday's challenger who is still not a triumphant is hated.

Also the world wants to use those with integrity, but hang out with those without integrity. The former are reliable, and with the latter you can make any deal.

No conclusion other than a dagger is good for the one holding it and evil for the one lacking it when needed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The world loves those enforcing rules, because they have to be strong for that, and the world loves those breaking rules, because if today they are making a challenge, tomorrow they might become even stronger. Humans follow strength. So a new challenger of existing order is loved, a yesterday’s challenger who is still not a triumphant is hated.

In my experience, a good microcosm example of that is sports; specifically MMA. Just have to pay attention to how quickly the narrative and majority opinion changes based on who has most recently won their fights. You also often see subconscious racism (or at least I like to think it's subconscious) affect people's opinions of fighters.

[–] Snapz 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Fucking Hans, you gullible bitch, showing your face around here again... You think you're gonna be a superman?

https://youtu.be/vGAqYNFQdZ4?feature=shared

[–] whotookkarl 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

FUD: increase fear, uncertainty, and doubt by spreading misinformation propaganda and undermining independent, fact based journalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt

It's the same tactic far right conservatives used against popular public progressive movements like the enlightenment, the hippies, corporate monopolies like IBM and Microsoft against open source, etc to divide the working class against themselves.

[–] CosmoNova 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Seeing it first hand with a shorts addict relative right now. It‘s just doomscrolling all the way to the 4th Reich for many of them. It‘s sadly not surprising but all the more horrifying to see how utterly unequipped we are to deal the pace of „social“ media and how easy it is to spread far right ideology with lies and memes. I think a ban of TikTok and Xitter is inevitable at this point. They‘re too far gone.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Like always, the 1% keep parasitising the wealth of a country till the inhabitants stop living in comfort. When populists capitalise on this, the answer is... Tik tok makes young men racist, not poverty and uneducation... Anything to avoid wealth re-distribution. *slow clap

Hopefully some enlightenment will come and the eyes will turn to the real responsibility for this situation, and then the guillotines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I think the point is not "this is all TikTok's fault", the point is things like TikTok makes it a lot easier to spread misinformation. People have shorter attention spans nowadays, and they prefer to spend their time consuming short form content such as the kind found on TikTok. The problem with this is that it takes a lot more effort to correct wrong information and educate people than it takes to spread misinformation. For example, it's much easier to clip something a politician says out of context and to make a 5 or 10 second clip for people to watch, than to convince people to watch a 5 minute interview or read an article for context.

And even though I don't use TikTok, I still kind of insert my self in here; I don't have the mental fortitude or patience to read every single article I come across, so I often read diagonally, check the summary, or (more rarely) just stick with the title.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Well, this being the BBC their take is NEVER (ever, ever) going to be that the empoverishment due to a social, political and economic structure than massively benefits the Owner class whilst empoverishing the rest and uses propaganda to distract the masses and to make sure any redistributive ideologies are un- or at least under-reported, is the one to blame for those most hit amongst the "plebes" are going to rebel and latch one to the only "non"-mainstream ideologies that do get reported about - the Far Right.

This is because in their own country and, to some level internationally, the BBC's function is to be a cog in exactly that propaganda machine.

The last thing you'll ever going to see is the news media who portrays "two sides coverage" (I.e. all subjects getting reduced to a dispute between the two main parties) as "fair" "journalism" covering any subject as a problem of how mainstream politics benefits the well-entrenced Owner class, especially the news media from a country were the Owner class is mainly made up of the same families as a century ago. At best, they'll cover the near-mainstream "blame outsiders" movements (such as the Far Right), never those pointing out how much of the blame rest on well off local elites

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This mirrors what’s happening with men of the same age in the US.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not surprising, given the same people are pushing the same rhetoric all over the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PugJesus 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Social media, particularly TikTok, has helped spread its message.

Lies are easier to spread than the truth, and often more easily accepted too. Social media is fucked because of the near total lack of moderation - or desire to enact such.

After all, the ultra-wealthy often have little objection to being the useful pets of fascists, so long as they get to keep slightly more of their money*.

*until the fascists decide they want it even more than the scawwy LIBERALS did

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›