this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
1065 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19786 readers
4735 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And this is why Democrats will keep losing.

(page 3) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (7 children)

@inclementimmigrant

IKR?!

WTF Dems...?

Stop enabling a tyrant. This is gonna bite you in the ass quicker than you thing.

[–] givesomefucks 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then they'd piss off their own donors too...

You know when the last big cut to the federal workforce was?

The 90s when Clinton was in office.

You know what trump was doing in the 90s? Donating so much to the DNC that the Clinton's came to one of his sham weddings.

If you want to know why neoliberals aren't opposing Donald Trump, it's because they've literally been working together to destroy the federal government and replace it with oligarchs for the last 30 years.

So stop acting surprised already, and start opposing them.

[–] TropicalDingdong 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Say it with me:

👏 Democrats👏 are👏 not👏 coming👏 to👏 save👏 us👏

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our only chance are the leftists that are too busy arguing semantics and refuse to work together! Aw shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Including some people who label themselves "Democrats."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah but bipartisanship. Mr. Hitler will surely see sense any day now, if we're polite and reasonable and try not to anger him.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."

[–] TropicalDingdong 34 points 1 day ago

Democrats would rather be fascists than fight fascists.

But when you try and run a campaign as off-brand, Mr Pibb, diet-fascists..

[–] fox2263 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fear of reprisal.

Once all these confirmations are done, you may see senators that voted against mysteriously fall out of windows.

[–] inclementimmigrant 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please, even Democrats who did vote for these unqualified fascist will get thorium poisoning.

[–] aesthelete 6 points 21 hours ago

Appeasement will not save anyone from the night of long knives.

[–] psmgx 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only way anything she says will have any impact is if she start getting the army ready to launch a counter-coup, or else starts building a leftwing militia.

No amount of not-nice wordsmithing and congressional wankery is going to work -- we're past that point now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

The best time for that would have been several years ago, but... hey, I mean, do it?

[–] xc2215x 6 points 1 day ago

Agreed. It has gone too far.

[–] SarcasticMan 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"But both parties are not the same" they screamed as the country burned and the elites on both sides of the aisle lined their pockets off the backs of their suffering constituents.

Come now children and give me your downvotes and paragraphs of bullshit telling me I am wrong.

[–] Jarix 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They may both be shit, but they arent the same....

[–] inclementimmigrant 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean we're talking just on paper at this point when the Democrats are enabling these neo-Nazi assholes and not putting up meaningful opposition.

I've defended people for both siding shit but damn at this point when you've got Democrats passing Laken Riley Act, which allows immigrants to be deported for being accused of fucking shoplifting and Democrats not only voting for Trump's neo-nazi, dog killing, environment killing nominees and then going on air and waximg poetic about the votes for them. What fucking shitty opposition party is this? It's not.

Your right, both parties are not the same, ones worse as a enabler of abusers, they're more pathetic than Trump's Republicans.

[–] Jarix 6 points 21 hours ago

Respectfully i disagree with where you went with this.

The devil is in the details as the saying goes and nuance and minute differences as well as intentions and purposes all matter.

Enabling is not worse than driving an outcome. It may be that the enablers are worse in some instances, but driving the worst outcomes is always worse than taking advantage of it when it's happening.

It's always worth it to get to the bottom of events and understand as much as is possible instead of just labeling things as "close enough so it doesn't matter" that's just going to l lead to enabling in w different way.

"They are both the same so i voted for the ones i find funniest, because they both the same"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Pot meet kettle

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›