this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
255 points (97.4% liked)

News

24658 readers
5317 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In addition to pursuing the death penalty where possible, the Attorney General shall, where consistent with applicable law, pursue Federal jurisdiction and seek the death penalty regardless of other factors for every federal capital crime involving:

(i)   The murder of a law-enforcement officer; or

(ii)  A capital crime committed by an alien illegally present in this country.

The Attorney General shall encourage State attorneys general and district attorneys to bring State capital charges for all capital crimes with special attention to the crimes described in Subsections (i) and (ii), regardless of whether the federal trial results in a capital sentence.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp 149 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, by this decree, the maga ass hats that killed the cops on J6 should be put to death, right? Right???

[–] Kayday 29 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately none of the families of cops that died from Jan 6 trauma were able to have it classified as "line of duty," as far as I'm aware.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So this means if you shoot a cop, don't stop after the first, right?

Seriously, WTF

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Actually that's how I read this. So you're already going to die. Might as well take out as many of them as possible.

In Minecraft.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 11 points 2 weeks ago

Assuming this isn't an after the fact arrest, if you kill a cop in a gun fight, and now you know you're a dead man even if you surrender, why should the cops even bother to try and bring you in.

They witnessed the crime. Punishment is death. Let them be the judge, jury and executioner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Just so more people know, the "in minecraft" defense has been already defeated in the courtroom.

Not that precedence in the court room matters anymore. We aren't rich or powerful enough to get the EZ mode enabled in the courtroom.

[–] FabledAepitaph 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I thought this was the reason they were so hesitant to give the death penalty. If you know you're going to get the death penalty, then why stop? What are they going to do--kill you twice? Lol

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts 115 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is terrifying. Please read this. Spread the word and be safe out there. They want to kill you.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I fear any time a cop dies, they're going to look for someone to blame and have them executed.

[–] lurklurk 41 points 2 weeks ago

It's what the nazis did against the resistance so it makes sense...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

True, now it's just fewer steps.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mr. 4D Chess has gone straight to trading pawns.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bad trade when the other side has a lot more pawns available...

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 5 points 2 weeks ago

The chussmasta

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Unless Trump disagrees with it then Trump will pardon them.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah didn't he just pardon 1,500 of them? I realize that not all of them actually got the chance to kill a cop that day, but some did and most seemed to be trying real hard to.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

Weren't some of them cops themselves?

[–] Omegamanthethird 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're all at least accessories to murder.

[–] AbidanYre 21 points 2 weeks ago
[–] jaybone 18 points 2 weeks ago

Why not just make every crime a federal crime. And then king Trump can decide all by himself what crime is ok and what crime is not.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What if a cop kills another cop?

Is that like dividing by zero?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago

They receive the worst possible punishment for cop: paid leave for 3 months, and then forced to apply at a different police district a town over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It'll get shuffled into some lower charge than murder. I remember a story where one cop drove past another during a traffic stop, doing something in the order of 100+ mph, hit the other one, dragged him a distance, and yup, the dude who got hit and dragged died. He wasn't charged with murder, but a lower manslaughter. The shit-for-brains actually pled not guilty, rejecting a plea bargain.

The reason he drove so fast by the other? It was a prank that supposedly was sometimes done.

[–] Kayday 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So the implication, not letter, of the 2nd ammendment gives US citizens the right to shoot cops if they are acting as an extension of a tyrannical state. I wonder if there is a case to be made that this executive order infringes on the constitution.
Of course, I don't expect any 2A stans to care.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Many states in the US explicitly say you can resist an officer using force when they shouldn't. Many juries, DAs, and other cops in said states won't give a shit.

As for the going against the constitution, the word murder in the executive order basically removes any contradiction, because murder is a legal term in the various penal codes and wouldn't fit someone who had shot a cop lawfully.

[–] stickmanmeyhem 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It will be selectively enforced. Oath Keepers and Proud Boys who beat cops using their "patriotic" flagpoles will be allowed to go free. Those less white will be executed in the street for masking a cop feel uncomfortable. Those who attempt to defend themselves from fascists trying to send their families to concentration camps will be executed in the camps.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

pursue Federal jurisdiction and seek the death penalty regardless of other factors

That's terrifying but seems badly written from a practical standpoint. If the AG is compelled to always go for death regardless of other factors it may sway juries to not convict in more cases where the death penalty really isn't deserved, and let free somebody who might have otherwise spent a reasonable (note: I say reasonable by the standards of our sick and twisted justice system) amount of time in prison.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's actually a really good point! This rule could backfire for maga. We the people should just nullify every trial.

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts 3 points 2 weeks ago

We won't need jury's where we're going!

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic 29 points 2 weeks ago

He's trying to prevent an uprising. Just don't get caught.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

So what if you kite one of them around until its attacks hit another cop?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

That second line is the first bit of result after over a year of both parties fearmongering about "the immigrant crisis". Deeply racist and violent country I hate this shit so much.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

And just like that, law-enforcement is now officially SS.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

There's already a de facto death penalty for anyone not meeting a cop's approval.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Alright now do death penalty for cops who kill innocent lives

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Alright now do death penalty for cops who kill innocent lives

Yeah, it's tragic when a life is killed!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I knew someone who was killed to death. They didn't survive.

[–] werefreeatlast 12 points 2 weeks ago

Except for the cops defending the prez in Jan6 specifically. Other dates, yeah, but not jan6.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Is this the day after he pardoned January 6 cop killers?

[–] harrybo93 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought the word “alien” was just some sarcastic paraphrasing.

It isn’t. They really used the word alien.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, it's a legal term. I would guess it's where we get aliens in the outer space concept as the word existed well before. Yeah 13th to 14the century. The spaceman version is from the 1950s (edit: per etymonline)