Valentine's Day is pure commercialist bullshit. Don't let that get you down.
There's also nothing wrong with being single, and you're not a "failure" if you are. Societal pressure to find a partner is nonsense.
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
14 points (75.0% liked)
Casual Conversation
1910 readers
204 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I am married, and we don’t care at all about either of these holidays. I don’t think that participation should be an indicator of success.
I'm not married. Hurts
In my younger life there was an older man who I spoke with quite a bit, an acquaintance
He spent about 5 years married to his first wife, who died.
He spent the next 30 years in relationships constantly pining over what could have been, never satisfied
Finally he turned 60 and his 4th wife got sick of him and divorced him
He was sad and lonely for 15 years after that, constantly sad about what could have been with his last wife, lost and not understanding why she left.
He's married again now, at 75, and still talks about his prior wife.
Contentment is not found in relationships, it comes from within, and bubbles up to whatever situation you find yourself in. Don't fall for the lie that you are a failure without a significant other.
Call me crazy, but I more than understand why someone would have permanent difficulty moving on from having someone closest to you die.
Sure, don't feel too bad for him though, he did abuse her and his kids
An abusive man who's constantly fishing for sympathy? Hmm...
Yikes...
Really elegantly said
I'm tired so to me that sounded like you were acquaintances for 60 years in your younger life, leading me to believe you were an elf or something. Then I remembered that this was real life...
But I am. I've never met ANYONE. No kiddie romance, no middle school crush or first girlfriend, no sex life, nothing. That dude is going to die but at least his life had a meaning and fulfilled his purpose. He can complain all he wants, he did his "thing" married, got kids and so on...
I'm zero on that.
I think you accidentally a huge Freudian slip on your second sentence.
I don't see it. Even before the correction
Do you desire to have those things or do you want to leave an impact on the world? If you don't actually desire to have romantic/sexual relationships with other humans that's fine and no matter how much importance allo people assign them you shouldn't feel like you need them.
I desire physical passion and the rest.
You did escape it.
I don't know any long-term couples who have not been cheated on. Straight people especially.
As a culture we are expected to find a partner, and feel like failures if we don't.
Because people are fucking idiots.
As a culture we used to expect angry people to use leeches to remove blood, or perform exorcisms on people that were mentally ill.
Fuck those expectations. Cultural attitudes can be wrong.
You didn't fail, you avoided anguish. Being single is far, far better than being stuck with someone because you felt like you had to.
The frustrating part of it is that humans are social creatures. So while it can be less stressful alone and less painful in certain ways (like never having someone cheat on you), it can be lonely is all.
In-person friends are better than a spouse because it's expected to take breaks from time to time. Go travel, or hunker down. Then reconnect with them later. With a spouse you're not allowed to do that, and it erodes the value of the relationship.
To make in-person friends, I go to public places where I'm comfortable, and act respectfully.
I've had five or six long term partners and they've all turned into selfish, entitled children after the honeymoon phase ended. I'm telling you, it's overrated.
That's a fair point. I have honestly never really sought out a partner before so I don't have much experience. But I do have experience with the disappointment of losing friends and/or not being able to do much with a friend because they have to prioritize their family above all else. It's perfectly understandable and not done in an argumentative or problematic way, but it does hurt sometimes. People grow apart from their friends as their friends' priorities and distances change.
So I've been more recently attempting to seek out a significant other because I want a friend who we will mutually prioritize and who won't be dipping out because of their children or otherwise drifting apart or etc. I don't even care about or want sex. I just want to have an equal.
It's maybe wishful thinking on my part. But that's my goal.
Never having intimacy or any type of relationship in these 35 years of my existence disagree with you. Yes, I would take being cheated on if that means breaking this black hole. Having something is always better than nothing.
Therapy might obviate the need for an escape and is likely free in your area! And you know folks would happily look up resources for you with nothing more than a region.
Whether you want to escape, well that's up to you.
Is it a failure, though?
Do you desire closeness, or do you want to fit into societal script?
Relationships ain't all shine and rainbows, and while they certainly contain nice experiences like these, all those hearts and butterflies, they are not a constant bliss, and many people in relationships actually crave some more time alone, of which you have plenty.
That said, I understand how lonely it may feel, and am with you. If you actually want it, you'll get it, I promise. Some people find their love at 20, some at 40, some at 60 - it's alright. But if you're only driven by the fear of missing out or societal pressure to live by the script - leave it, it's not worth it.
Use this as an opportunity. Put in more effort to make it happen. Yeah, it isn’t a straightforward path, but not many things in life are.
Good luck man! Life is sometimes hard, but we get through it.