this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
337 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

60633 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be a HUGE Conflict of Interest if he was also a Government Official overseeing things like Regulation and Contracts! Intel would be his THIRD or FOURTH or FIFTH company that would rely on Government Funding!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

As if republicans would care…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine being a business willing to risk everything getting involved with this lunatic lol

If businesses nowadays were people we'd have interventions for them or lock them up for their own sake.

[–] Jarix 5 points 20 hours ago

Elon has money, intel needs money

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see how Qualcomm buying Intel ever flies when Nvidia was blocked from buying ARM.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Of course Elon Musk wants his grubby hands on the Arizona chip factory.

[–] Gammelfisch 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Leon buys Intel, then I will switch permanently to AMD or the loser is playing with the market.

[–] cm0002 8 points 1 day ago

switch permanently to AMD

So glad I switched to AM5 on my last main gaming rig rebuild last year lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That's a silly reason to pick a piece of tech IMO. I buy exclusively AMD because they offer great value, especially since they support their sockets for a long time. For their GPUs, they have fantastic drivers on Linux.

I honestly don't care who owns them, I care that the quality is good for the price. I don't find that to be true for Tesla, so I don't own one. If he buys Intel, that won't change my opinion of their products, I'll still avoid them because he value isn't there.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

So he'll pay again twice the amount of money, then run the company off a bigger cliff than it's currently falling off already?

I'll heat up the popcorn

[–] aesthelete 81 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sounds terrible. I'm sure it'll happen cuz we live in hell.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago

This rumor sounds like a crypto pump and dump.

Please buy Intel stock so we can sell ours!!

[–] EvilBit 273 points 2 days ago (10 children)

No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

[–] chiliedogg 3 points 19 hours ago

Ultimately, the board doesn't control who can buy stock.

[–] breakingcups 126 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel's scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago (5 children)

this is the company that at one time chose to buy mcafee.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

I thought the cross licensing deal between AMD and Intel basically collapses if one gets bought out?

So intel wouldn't be able to make 64 bit processors any more?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 181 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This was always the inevitable outcome of capitalism. Just some rich lying dipshit buying the world.

[–] alsu2launda 64 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I think elons would be needed to be broken down by government like the Rockefellers.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pozzy77 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They have to old slogan of intel inside ready to be rebranded as incel inside

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 2 days ago (23 children)

That's one way to finally kill x86.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't he busy enough buying the United States right now?

[–] Kbobabob 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I thought that was bought and paid for already.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 days ago

Right, because Intel needs MORE problems.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

Bad vibes, I say.

For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

Tldr - it's a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

[–] GhostlyPixel 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He’s going to rename the i series to something ridiculous like i69, i420, i1337, and iX isn’t he?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 41 points 2 days ago

The new Incel X series

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That would be good news for AMD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I appreciate him doing this after intel lost their magic, otherwise, it would have been much harder emotionally.

[–] cm0002 26 points 2 days ago (14 children)

They lost it in CPUs, but I think they're actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DicJacobus 25 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven't used intel since 2012.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is still extremely bad for the industry, regardless of whether you personally use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psycho_driver 21 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

If he buys intel surely he is buying your investment in intel to do so?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ikidd 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Who wants to get in bed with Elon so he drives the brand into the ground? How much has Fidelity written down their investment in Twitter, 80%?

[–] Brkdncr 53 points 2 days ago (9 children)

On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›