this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
176 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19347 readers
2109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In Minnesota's evenly split state House (67-67), Republicans have temporarily seized control by exploiting a judicial ruling that disqualified a Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) legislator, giving the GOP a 67-66 edge.

Despite the lack of quorum and an upcoming special election likely to restore the tie, Republicans unilaterally elected a speaker and are blocking another DFL candidate certified as the winner after a recount.

Critics label this a "coup," reflecting broader trends of minority rule and disregard for democratic norms.

Legal challenges are underway to restore balance.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Wasn't the Minnesota GOP on the brink of bankruptcy? I read about that a couple of years back.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The other really important part of this story that is not mentioned is in the MN state senate there is also a tie. The DFL and MN State Republicans parties have created a power sharing agreement there already. They have dual chairs of the committees, an agreement for how the parties will control the agenda and how bills will be introduced etc. So there is even a template to work off of that was already hammered out by the two parties.

Everyone knows that no matter what there will be bipartisan agreement because of the split senate and state house. Our DFL governor, everyone's favorite Midwestern dad Tim Walz released his budget which includes tax cuts and reduction in total spending knowing that this is something that will need to happen. Everyone else is acting like adults but the house republicans. It's a disgrace and completely invalidates the MN reputation of good governance which was something that both parties used to brag about.

[–] chuckleslord 2 points 54 minutes ago

The MN GOP is better compared to the national GOP, but it's a very low bar. Don't give them more credit than they deserve. They ratfuck with the best of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Libs allow fascism through constant collaboration and worthless performative "resistance".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Not just a modern issue, this applies historically as well.

Hitler didn't get elected Chancellor; he was appointed by a liberal as an attempt at compromise.

https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/paul-von-hindenburg

[–] Freefall 72 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Getting sick of this shit.

[–] Chainweasel 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We have a specific amendment that the right likes to shove in our faces as being designed to prevent tyranny.
It's a goddamn shame we won't use it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Some of us are. Luigi did.

[–] grue 5 points 5 hours ago

Two people tried to use it against Trump, so far.

[–] Cris_Color 24 points 12 hours ago

Same. NC is having similar issues with the legislature stripping some amount of power from the Democratic Governor who won, and the Republican judge who lost is challenging the Democrat winner by trying to argue in court that certain votes should be thrown out.

American democracy wasn't exactly super functional, but this is genuinely fucked.

[–] Xanis 0 points 5 hours ago

Patient of a saint right here.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is there nothing the Governor can do in this situation? Or would it have to be the courts?

[–] dhork 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Typically, legislatures have broad latitude to organize committees and set up rules, by majority vote. Anything that is not mandated by existing legislation or the relevant Constitution is changeable if the body votes for it, and no other branch would get up in their business over it.

However, this case may be an exception:

It takes, by statute, 68 votes for a quorum and 68 votes to pass anything in the chamber. There’s no wiggle room here. When Democrats boycotted the opening session Tuesday, NBC News reported, “Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, who controls the chamber’s gavel between sessions, adjourned the state House and said there was no quorum.” The state House, legally, could not act. Nevertheless, in a half-empty chamber, the 67 Republicans plowed ahead and elected state Rep. Lisa DeMuth as the speaker.

That means there is a law that defines quorum for this body, which the Republicans purposely ignored to install a speaker. That Speaker election will, no doubt, be challenged in court. I'd be interested to know what the Republican justification is for this....

[–] homesweethomeMrL 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be interested to know what the Republican justification is for this....

Oh, I have that here somehwere, let me see . . . uhh . . I think it's under these papers here . . one second . . . ahhhhhh . . Yeah . . . yep . . .okay here it is. *ahem*

"We're complete fucking assholes."

[–] dhork 7 points 11 hours ago

The only justification that makes sense is "See that 'R' after our names? That's why". And some judges would allow that.