this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
920 points (98.9% liked)

Lefty Memes

4955 readers
827 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RubberElectrons 151 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hope these motherfuckers and their apologists die.

[–] theUwUhugger 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Luigi doing it! And now u can do…

[–] RubberElectrons 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that Tony Hawk why does that look like Tony Hawk

[–] RubberElectrons 9 points 1 month ago

No lmfao that's Tim Robinson 😂😂😂😂

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Iheartcheese 19 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Not soon enough.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you offer the newer, better treatments for free, right? Right???

[–] NocturnalMorning 46 points 1 month ago

That's the neat part, you don't.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Except if diabetics had cheap safe access to insulin none of them would die………..

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 70 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The point it seems like they are trying to make (and I have only read up till the paywall) is that there are multiple forms of insulin, and newer versions basically work better. Many people are getting the newer, better drugs, but having to ration them because of how expensive they are. If plain, old insulin becomes cheap enough such that people switch to it (critically, without some extra effort by our healthcare system), a percentage of people will end up dying. Managing diabetes is all about keeping blood glucose stable, and that is asier to do with the modern stuff.

They retitled the article to "Making Insulin Cheaper Isn’t Enough", which i think is a much better headline.

And again, I could only read up till the paywall, so i could be giving them too much credit.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fact they changed the headline is itself praiseworthy, but the fact it was click bait and sensationalist to begin counters it.

The point about making the older stuff cheaper is something that isn't mentioned as much as it should be in these debates.

Ultimately even if the older stuff is worse and requires more attention and monitoring (less convenient), it is still better than nothing.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone posted a link to the full text. Looks like their main point is that for most people with diabetes (who have type 2), insulin of any form isn't the best first line treatment, things like glp-1 receptor agonists (e.g., ozempic) work way better, but since it's not "insulin" it's not covered.

I'm guessing the editors of the Atlantic gave it the original bad headline, cause it seems like the author is genuine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

So the physician cares about patient wellbeing while the newspaper cares about engagement? Sounds about right

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

“Making Insulin Cheaper Isn’t Enough” sounds like a good headline on its own, but with the context of the original headline and tagline, it sure sounds like the rest of the article is going to be making point for not making insulin cheaper at all.

Maybe there is a real call to action buried past the paywall, but I don't see it, and therefore I can only assume that what I can see without paying is the message they want to push.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone posted a link to the full text. Looks like their main point is that for most people with diabetes (who have type 2), insulin of any form isn't the best first line treatment, things like glp-1 receptor agonists (e.g., ozempic) work way better, but since it's not "insulin" it's not covered.

I'm guessing the editors of the Atlantic gave it the original bad headline, cause it seems like the author is genuine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I didn't have a paywall for some reason, so here's the gist of it:

Insulin is only the first choice for type 1 diabetes. For type 2, there are alternatives (not just variants of insulin, but actually different drugs) with fewer side effects, and which are more effective against the serious dangers like heart attacks. But when insulin gets much cheaper, those patients (i.e. the majority of diabetes patients) could end up using insulin and run a higher risk of those more deadly symptoms. Towards the end, the article even says: "In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

No. Idiot. Only the capitalist class can construct hypothetical scenarios.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, who is this Rose fellow?

Michael Rose is a senior resident in internal medicine and pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The only person The Atlantic could find to peddle this shit isn’t even allowed to practice medicine without supervision? lmao

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AeonFelis 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This was not written by some rich asshole. This was written by someone on the payroll of some rich asshole.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes! Without shared ownership over the companies we work at, we have no ownership over how our labor is used. This is why a worker owned economy is such a critical part of Marxism and why Social democracy's attempt to achieve socialist goals through higher taxes and labor rights isn't enough (a golden cage is still a cage.) The heart of socialism is giving people a shared ownership over their labor which means they get a voice and vote on how their labor will be used

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The title of the article is clickbait/ragebait. The actual article content is a little different. The gist of it is more so this:

In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications.

https://archive.is/tvVHP

Headline writters are often/usually different people than the person who wrote the article leading to infuriating things like this

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah well in this case it basically means that the headline is absolute bullshit. It might as well have said something about puppies.

News organizations should be held to higher standards here, and be honest ffs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What’s worse - taking diabetes medication that’s somewhat outdated, or taking no diabetes medication at all?

I’m not a doctor, but I bet I know the answer.

[–] ridethisbike 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

YoU jUsT hAvE To WaTcH yOuR DiEt

-them probably

[–] ZILtoid1991 6 points 1 month ago

yOu juSt hAve To cuT swEetS, maYBe tRY tHe CArniVorE DieT

- them actually

Other times they'll just advise you to use honey, because they think that's not sugar.

[–] Cheems 35 points 1 month ago

If diabetics get insulin for free they'd become dependent and require it for the rest of their lives. It's safer to just let them die or leave them homeless because they have to spend all their money on it.

~/s~

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Have you read the article? It's about how type 2 patients, for whom insulin isn't the best option and who make up the majority of diabetes patients could end up having to use insulin because it's cheaper.

"In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

for whom diabetes isn't the best option and who make up the ...

I guess you meant to say "insulin is not the best option"? Because diabetes seems like a shit option all around.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Shhh, now come and sweep yourself under that nice little carpet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better than having nothing which is the current situation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the point is that insurances might not pay for the better options as willingly as they do now if there's a cheaper option. But I understand too little of the US healthcare system to be completely sure.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The problems aren’t the treatments, the problems are still the assholes pricing the treatments that exacerbate issues with treatment affordability and selection.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

A lot of type two patients need to manage their diets better. You wouldn't believe the number of people who just keep eating like shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Any society which holds “your money or your life” as a valid argument is not one which should exist.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

There's plenty of countries with cheap insulin, and people there are fine because other treatments for diabetes are cheaper too.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Bullshit take. Some people ONLY respond to insulin. Fuck whoever wrote this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kreskin 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is horrfying. Shame on the atlantic for publishing that headline.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This only makes sense if the new treatments are cheaper or free than insulin. Which I'd bet a body part they aren't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 10 points 1 month ago

Capitalism fixes everything, duh. Why didn't I realize. I'm so dumb. It's science. Apply capitalism, and bam, nuclear energy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Michael Rose

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pardon me, but, Mr Rose, can you please tell me.... What fucking better treatments?

My brother is T1D and he's been like that since his teens. Literally the only way for him to continue to live, at all, is to take insulin.

It's times like this that make me thankful I don't live in the USA.

But seriously, if anyone knows of a "better" treatment for type 1 diabetes, I'm all ears. I've been looking for something for my brother for years, and I've come up with jack shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson 5 points 1 month ago

take so hot
hot hot take
take so hot you fry an egg

load more comments
view more: next ›