this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
582 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60251 readers
5787 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ETA: Paywall bypass link: https://archive.is/vyU15

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notannpc 238 points 2 days ago (7 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

[–] nialv7 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

this is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference back in June. the appeals court has to apply the law. so you know who to blame.

expect more cases like this in coming years...

[–] werefreeatlast 2 points 1 day ago

Sarcastically speaking, if they want white only public bathrooms, that would be interesting. On the one hand people gave up their lives for us to have the freedom to go in the same places as white people. On the other hand... Its public restrooms!

[–] Snapz 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This isn't "our government" these are the oligarch's meatbags purchased for surprisingly low dollar amounts. These men (and women that silently stand next to them until they are told they are allowed to speak) are cowards and traitors. They are not "our government"

Your post is the right energy, wrong message.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

It's by design: the rich know how easily "representatives" can be bought.

[–] btaf45 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

More specifically: gop.gov

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's currently not fill with people who want to help "prople". It currently is setup to help corporate America only at this point. At the expense of your rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know, in Germany there are some (we call them Reichsbürger ~ Empire Citizens) that believe the allied installed a puppet government in Germany and we are actually a GmbH (equivalent to US LLCs according to Wikipedia) called the Bundesrepublik Deutschland GmbH and a kind of proof should be that are ID cards are called "Personalausweis" which could be taken as Personal (eng. Employee) and Ausweis (eng. Identification).

The US basically does all of the Corpo things those conspiracy nuts see into the German government.
From the BS corp politics down to the office rumors.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sounds a lot like American sovereign citizens. SovCits believe America is a corporation that was set up on top of the Articles of Confederation, (which was the precursor to the American Constitution). They basically believe that they can refuse to do business with the “corporation” (government) and be able to break any laws that aren’t written in the Articles of Confederation.

It’s where the “I’m not driving, I’m traveling” memes come from, because the articles of confederation mentioned a right to freely travel. So the SovCits think they can drive without a valid license or vehicle registration, which leads to lots of police dashcam footage of SovCits getting tased during traffic stops when they become irate or try to flee.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I believe we call them Corporate-Americans these days, they're legally people.

[–] werefreeatlast 4 points 1 day ago

One could go for a hundred years and not touch this shit. But nah. Some dirtbag judge asshole actively working to fuck us all over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 151 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If the FCC can't regulate anything I guess I'll just run a high power jammer and block all cell signal in the area.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait! You will get in trouble for that. Instead you need to have an LLC that does that for Profit somehow. Then all is forgiven!

[–] horse_battery_staple 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a privacy subscription service.

[–] bhamlin 11 points 1 day ago

Privacy? You can't have privacy.

It's to block access to CSAM. Shame it blocks everything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg 11 points 1 day ago

Put hundreds of them in a pretty boxes, form an LLC, get a few VCs to sign on, flip the switch, then charge a monthly fee to "open previously-inacessible service areas to cellular customers" and you'll have a successful startup!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Hold on, GumpyDuckling... checks clipboard tsk tsk, I see here you're not wealthy enough to effectively lobby to get us in trouble; I'm afraid that'll be a $10,000 fine.

[–] finitebanjo 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah but technically it's still illegal to disrupt emergency services and also leaves you liable to lawsuits.

But yeah, the FCC in particular can't stop you from doing that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ahh, but you can subscribe to my private emergency services on my own frequencies which aren't blocked, then nobody can block mine because they are the only available emergency service frequency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Botzo 26 points 2 days ago
[–] BlameTheAntifa 142 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Their excuse is that telecom services aren’t actually providing telecom services, but information services.

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you aren’t brain-damaged.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

So.... They're responsible for the misinformation sent to my device against my will now, right?

Obviously not because our leaders need to be killed brutally where all can see what happens, but in principle?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Courted reclassified the services to remove FCC ability to regulate telecos?

Talk about bad faith behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 266 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Amazing how much the US judiciary branch seems to hate the plebs.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 days ago (51 children)

Republicans have spent the last 40 years purchasing the entire system, obviously it works for them. They're the ones that paid for it.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 94 points 2 days ago

Note that it piggybacks on the SCROTUS decision earlier about preventing government from protecting anything from industry.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They're going to use this for censorship.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Torproject.org. There's absolutely no way to censor the entire internet, short of entirely disconnecting the internet.

[–] pdxfed 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They're trying to ban tiktok. I've never used it but it's just because it's Chinese, social media from any other company based in any other country is just as fucked and unhealthy and unregulated in the US, but they are going to ban it specifically for its country of origin. China pills a lot of weight and the company tiktok is powerful and fighting it in court and all but it seems pretty obvious it'll go through even under current admin watch--let alone when a direct competitor and owner of Xitter owns the White House.

While yes, you're logistically correct it would be very difficult to shut down the whole Internet, that's not the goal, the goal is to massively control it and enshittify it beyond your worst dreams.

Look to China and Russia for "internet"TM

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fair point. But I just believe it goes to show that more websites need to be available on the darknet. Not because it's a scary or bad place to be, but because it can't be censored. Not nearly as easily, anyway. Top level domains can very easily be seized by the domain registrar or ICANN, etc. But since onion domains use keys, it's impossible to seize them without seizing the server they run on.

The vast majority of people are woefully ill-prepared for an adversarial internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Botzo 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But they'll call it freedom of speech. Speech someone/corp paid for of course, but Citizens United...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corporations are just sovereign citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 days ago (8 children)

All laws protecting the people's interests are now banned. Don't like it? Well become a billionaire and maybe the supreme Court will care

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 days ago (15 children)

comes a time when blue states just need to draw the line and flat out refuse to follow federal laws and judges until federal judges stop being corrupt.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They do it for marijuana laws but won’t treat anything else like that. I don’t understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent 70 points 2 days ago (9 children)

long-winded sigh

I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up...

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›