this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
100 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Lara Trump, daughter-in-law of Donald Trump, has withdrawn her name from consideration for Florida’s Senate seat, previously held by Marco Rubio.

Rubio, nominated for secretary of state, will have his replacement chosen by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

A prominent surrogate during Donald Trump’s campaign, Lara’s withdrawal follows speculation about her continued political ambitions.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 44 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

UH OH! Somebody found something juicy on her.

[–] HappycamperNZ 2 points 2 hours ago

I think we established already that doesn't matter. Oh wait, woman - matters now for some reason.

[–] Rapidcreek 35 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

She also won't accept the Grammy for Best Song

[–] athairmor 18 points 7 hours ago

That would make a great article for The Onion. A whole bunch of things she announces she’s turned down that she is completely unqualified for.

[–] Plum 14 points 7 hours ago

She was RNC chair briefly, right? I bet she couldn't withstand any scrutiny as to where the money was spent. Same with the DNC. Follow the money.

[–] ATDA 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Considering people straight up do not care if these people are murderers I can only assume she's done something cripplingly embarrassing, or she has been told she's getting put somewhere better which is worse...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Senator is a tough job. She can probably do better in something else, like a Cabinet post.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You're right, she probably could grift better in something else like a cabinet post. Senators don't get nearly the same opportunities for corruption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Also, the Cabinet posts come with a built-in 'deep state' of professionals who do most of the actual work.

[–] cabron_offsets 8 points 7 hours ago

Maybe she hasn’t raped anybody?

[–] Eldritch 9 points 8 hours ago

Lol as if she would want to even pretend to work.