this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
351 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2442 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wait, I thought this was already the national bird: 🖕

[–] [email protected] 3 points 58 minutes ago

Or was a close call. I heard that were debating changing the national bird to the Hawk Tuah

[–] mlg 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Actually the Senate passed this in July. It took until now for Congress to pass literally the easiest partisan bill probably because they were waiting to use it as their next shitty rider platform, or because they were too busy wasting time creating a new committee to investigate TikTok.

[–] finitebanjo 11 points 3 hours ago

Investigating TikTok is money well spent, fuck the CCP.

[–] OCATMBBL 28 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I found the reason on Wikipedia

"The bald eagle is an opportunistic feeder."

It's the bird the US leadership most identifies with.

[–] mhague 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

I think it's the eyes...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

This timeline is suck.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago (13 children)

Ah yes, really focusing on the important shit here. I can see why the US is doing so well.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] simplejack 80 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The real national bird is the boneless chicken.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Also, the buffalo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] return2ozma 107 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Remember, this was a serious contender for president to the media, while they blacked out Bernie.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Biden could protest this nothing bill by refusing to sign it or veto it. ~~Worst case, he leaves a bit of extra paperwork for Trump.~~

Edit: some context

President has 10 days to sign or veto. If 10 days pass, the bill will become a law if Congress is in session. The bill will die if it is in recess.

Reference: https://explainingthelaw.com/can-congress-override-a-bill-if-the-president-doesnt-sign-it-and-doesnt-return-it-with-objections/

[–] TropicalDingdong 24 points 10 hours ago
[–] cheese_greater 51 points 10 hours ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Not technically no, we all apparently thought it was. Now it is official.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

It's not like if they didn't pass this law they would have snuck in Medicare for all - I hate the "Is this a good use of your time" argument.

But it's never a bad time to criticize how ineffective lawmakers are.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

Anything other than this would've had an impact on people's lives. They don't need universal healthcare. They need something.

Your comment is a prime example of the nirvana fallacy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] normalexit 4 points 6 hours ago

They could get a vote on the record where Republicans voted against healthcare. We got this bird thing though, so that's neat.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago

The 118th Session? Yeah, we don't even have a parallel in all of the history of the US to mark how unproductive this session has been. Like not even during the Civil War was Congress this underwhelming. The 118th Session has set a new low water mark for "things gotten done".

The biggest issue was that the House spent something like ~60% of their time in Committee doing "investigations" that ultimately led nowhere. Like, I'll throw Congress a bone here, if they actually impeached someone with all those investigations, I'd give it to them. But that literally nobody was impeached all those investigations basically go into the "wasted time" column.

And they can't impeach any of them come the 119th session because... New President, new people. So all that time they invested goes to waste. Hell, even Hunter I can't give it to them, because in the end, he got a pardon. And as soon as Trump gives the J6 folks a pardon, all that work the Democrats did becomes wasted as well.

But the 118th spent the vast majority of their time in investigations, so they got so little actually done and passed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Doesn't seem very fitting. Maybe pick one of those birds that eat eggs from other species, replaces with their own and then their babies destroy the other eggs.

load more comments
view more: next ›