this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
350 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2403 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

It's not like if they didn't pass this law they would have snuck in Medicare for all - I hate the "Is this a good use of your time" argument.

But it's never a bad time to criticize how ineffective lawmakers are.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Anything other than this would've had an impact on people's lives. They don't need universal healthcare. They need something.

Your comment is a prime example of the nirvana fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

this session has been a dud from the start.

a split congress isn't gonna get much of anything worthwhile done, especially not this late in a session.. and extra-especially-not with the ultra hyper-partisanship exhibited by the 'modern' republicant party since at least the 1990s.

want something done? something awesome and good? help get democrats and progressives 75%+ of each chamber of congress, plus 38+ state legislatures.

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 3 hours ago

I think you're cool and a really good person.

[–] krashmo 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans get large chunks of what they want without a majority like that in Congress on a regular basis. If they can do it so could Democrats. They choose not to. There's no shortage of convenient scapegoats but there is a massive shortage of meaningful action.

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like you're missing the very clear context that Republicans are hyper partisan who refuse to cross the isle. Earlier this year they voted down their own border security bill because Biden gave it the greenlight.

[–] krashmo 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm very aware of the context. For my entire life Democrats have spent more time talking about building coalitions with racists or pointing at their token centrist progress blocker than they have doing anything useful. Say what you like about Republicans but they get their horrible shit done when they have the chance and they don't give a fuck about decorum or tradition and their voters love them for it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Healthcare for ~~some~~ none, small American flags for others!

[–] alquicksilver 4 points 9 hours ago

But only if they're made in China.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 6 points 9 hours ago

They don’t need universal healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Glad to see the needs of the people are being taken seriously as usual.

[–] normalexit 4 points 6 hours ago

They could get a vote on the record where Republicans voted against healthcare. We got this bird thing though, so that's neat.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago

The 118th Session? Yeah, we don't even have a parallel in all of the history of the US to mark how unproductive this session has been. Like not even during the Civil War was Congress this underwhelming. The 118th Session has set a new low water mark for "things gotten done".

The biggest issue was that the House spent something like ~60% of their time in Committee doing "investigations" that ultimately led nowhere. Like, I'll throw Congress a bone here, if they actually impeached someone with all those investigations, I'd give it to them. But that literally nobody was impeached all those investigations basically go into the "wasted time" column.

And they can't impeach any of them come the 119th session because... New President, new people. So all that time they invested goes to waste. Hell, even Hunter I can't give it to them, because in the end, he got a pardon. And as soon as Trump gives the J6 folks a pardon, all that work the Democrats did becomes wasted as well.

But the 118th spent the vast majority of their time in investigations, so they got so little actually done and passed.

[–] PapaStevesy 1 points 5 hours ago

They could have tried to do anything actually beneficial for Americans instead though. Like, think about how many hours of work it took Klobuchar's political peons just to draft the stupid thing. And, they we paid them to do it!! Get fucked Congress.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is so true. Can you walk and chew gum at the same time? Listen to a podcast while driving? Even our US Representatives can focus on more than one thing at a time...

[–] krashmo 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ok sure, but what's one other thing they're focused on that actually helps regular Americans? Biden is pardoning his family members, Pelosi is grinding the gears of progress to a halt with her withered corpse, most of the rest of the DNC are wringing their hands about the past or apparently daydreaming about birds, who knows what the fuck Kamala is up to, and Republicans are gearing up to put a bunch of sexual predators in charge of various government agencies.

Ukraine seems to be getting some money so that's nice I guess. Is there something useful to the American people that I'm missing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ok sure, but what’s one other thing they’re focused on that actually helps regular Americans?

probably like 20 odd pieces of legislation, probably more, sitting around.

[–] krashmo 1 points 3 hours ago

I'd probably love to see specifics, probably.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s not like if they didn’t pass this law they would have snuck in Medicare for all

I might have been at least somewhat mollified of "Natural Bird" meant "New environmental focus on protecting the species" rather than "National Meme". Might as well make America's national bird the Dodo, given the rate at which we're decimating their ecology.

[–] Rapidcreek 1 points 9 hours ago

The bald eagle is well protected as a species. Federal charges for killing one. Course that may change under Trump.