Clearly someone needs to step up and start deepthroatfaking the fat old white dudes. For parity.
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19222 readers
2368 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm remembering earlier shows from John Oliver and there was a some fair bit of old junk in there. I almost dipped out of the show at that point. I've noticed they have not done it since....
Nah, just generate sad selfies in front of a mirror looking for their small, flaccid penis and shriveled testicles. Really reflect reality and their inner souls.
Expect for Lindsey, deepthroatfaking would be the true reflection.
The last thing I want to see is deep fake porn of scrotum neck McConnell
you wouldnt be able to differentiate where the senator begins and the scrotum ends...
Senile Mutant Oppressive Turtles
Not much of a target audience for that show I don't think, but rule 34 may prove me wrong.
What I have learned from the Internet, that if you think it may be someone’s type of porn. It’s someone’s type of porn.
Porn is legal in the USA, who the hell is going "I wanna see AI Nancy Pelosi strip?"
Porn is legal in the USA
For now.
The nazis on 4chan like degrading AOC stuff
Idk man, she has some hefty naturals, I would be lying if I said I had never thought about it.
Younger Pelosi was a real smokeshow as far as I understand it.
It would not surprise me if somebody had done this to humilate the women involved or because they thought it was "funny" rather than actually being sexually interested in them.
Make some of the men in Congress and watch how fast deepfake control laws get passed
Being that they are already charging minors for such acts, the laws must already exist in some places. https://feddit.uk/post/21197422
But those all center around kids, so they may get a pass because they are adults. I imagine there must be other rules for other ages. Then again they used revenge porn against Hunter and that went off without a problem
Is it me or is this just really stupid? Like just why?
I mean have you seen Boebert?
She's dumb as a rock but she's pretty damn hot.
And after the Hunter Biden dick pics it's only fair we nudify the entire republican party.
She really isn't though. She pretends to be.
EDIT: ...and just to be clear... I meant she pretends to be hot. And yes, she's dumb as a rock.
I meant she pretends to be hot.
I usually try to not criticize women's looks, but someone once compared her to Bert (as in Bert and Ernie) and I couldn't unsee it. Whenever I see video of her blathering on about something incredibly stupid - like not understanding fundamental things that make this country truly great, like separation of church and state, and freedom FROM religion - she reminds me of a puppet and I'm looking for where the hand is operating her yapper.
Shit, if it gets congress to enact any sort of regulations, then I encourage more deep fakes of people in Congress. But target the men too. Put their faces on some nude saggy old bodies and they'll have a draft bill in a week.
“Damn, why didn’t we just think of making women’s lives even worse so that we can make progress! -newthrowaway20
Oh yeah. Because we clearly made so much progress before.
Idk if it’s funny or sad that people look at the progress over the past 200 years and say “whelp, we didn’t get much done!”