this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
111 points (99.1% liked)

Data is Beautiful

5020 readers
8 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two supermassive black holes are locked in an orbital dance at the core of the distant galaxy OJ 287. This diagram shows their sizes relative to the solar system. The larger one, with about 18 billion times the mass of our sun (right), would encompass all the planets in the solar system with room to spare. The smaller one is about 150 million times the mass of our sun (left), which would be large enough to swallow up everything out to the asteroid belt, just inside the orbit of Jupiter.

https://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/image/ssc2020-11b-sizes-of-black-holes-in-galaxy-oj-287-relative-to-the-solar-system

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GraniteM 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What does "size" mean in the context of a black hole? Is that the size of their event horizons?

[–] Carrolade 10 points 1 week ago

Yes, they're talking about the volume encompassed by the event horizon.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Man, getting to explore the universe would be fucking cool

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Cool, but only if you could somehow do it very quickly (which would violate the laws of physics) or had some sort of suspended animation system you repeatedly went into. Even the nearest star to us would take you well over 4 years to reach at the speed of light.

As for OJ 287, it would take you five billion years to get there. Longer than the Earth has existed.

[–] SidewaysHighways 7 points 1 week ago

Or if we divorced ourselves from biological life!

[–] Carrolade 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not totally settled that practical FTL is actually impossible. There's possibly loopholes that can potentially be exploited, such as the Alcubierre drive that attempts to to shrink spacetime in front of it while expanding spacetime behind it. So while it itself moves at a slower speed, it traverses through an artificially shortened distance basically.

It's all still sci fi at this point of course, and probably isn't practical due to enormous energy requirements. (like, you'd basically need a star or something to power it as far as we know) But, we're still pretty far from understanding what dark energy is, so things could potentially change at some point in the future. shrug

No reason not to let the kids dream though, they may be the ones studying these things in the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's all still sci fi at this point of course

Wasn't there a simulation, that shown it will work? Provided we somehow obtain insane amount of energy or exotic matter.

[–] Carrolade 2 points 6 days ago

Not sure. All I've heard is that it's still theoretically possible.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You must be fun at parties.

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry you don't find data to be beautiful.

[–] lolrightythen 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I found it very interesting!

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Why do you think we all get wet over Trek!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Now like, a very small purple ring with a huge yellow ring around it and the new tag is “ur mom lawl”

[–] Atlas_ 3 points 1 week ago

I can only dream of making a purple ring that large, but the one I got is pretty nice too. 💎✊

[–] itsnotits 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why does it say "Earth's Solar System" when the Solar System is clearly named after the Sun (i.e. the system of Sol)?

[–] UmeU 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

~~Solar system = sun system. Stars in other systems are still suns even if they aren’t called sol.~~ I am wrong see below

[–] itsnotits 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Stars in other stellar systems are called stars. There's only one star in the universe named the Sun, and its system is the only Solar System in the universe. The same is true for solar wind (vs. stellar wind), solar mass, solar day, solar radius, etc. — all of these terms refer to Sol, a.k.a. the Sun.

[–] IndiBrony 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And it's the small black holes that'll fuck you up. Once you're in that gravity well you're never getting out.

[–] deus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't larger black holes work the same way?

[–] peopleproblems 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Technically you aren't screwed unless you are in an orbit that crosses the event horizon.

Although I wonder if the accretion disk produces enough drag that an orbit could eventually fall into the black hole.

Also, time gets funky when you get closer and closer to the black hole.

But in any case the behavior is the same. It's just a lot bigger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would it be different from a suns gravity well? Unless you mean the event horizon but I don't get why the small one would be worse.

[–] Carrolade 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's probably talking about tidal forces. Gravity falls off with the square of distance, so the closer you get to the center, the greater the difference in gravitational strength becomes for every meter of distance. With a supermassive, you're far enough from the center that your head and feet experience similar levels of gravity at the event horizon.

With a small one you're much closer to the center, so your head and feet experience extremely different gravity, which rips you apart.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is the small one that small though. I mean its still like the inner planets size.

[–] Carrolade 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, these two specifically are huge and huger. lol