this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
220 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19236 readers
3179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 98 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Musk is worth around $232 billion

So $250 million is about .001 of his wealth

It’s like if someone with assets of $500,000

Gave a $585 donation

So

Thanks to excessive greed and Citizens United

Not only can billionaires buy our elections

It doesn’t even cost them all that much

[–] Blue_Morpho 41 points 2 weeks ago

And because he's now in control of some government spending, his $250m investment has already paid off several times over.

[–] danc4498 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This probably doesn’t include using his social media platform that he owns and paid many billions for. That’s unquantifiable, but only possible when you’re a billionaire.

Same goes for other sources owned by billionaires. The newspapers that refused to endorse. Facebook allowing all kinds of fake news posts.

[–] billiam0202 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, we can already quantify a floor of $44 billion. So he spent at least that much buying his way into the White House.

[–] Sanctus 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm fucken mad, are you?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Plus his part of the $42bn on Twitter

[–] lath 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And on the other side of the ocean there's Romania annulling election results due to foreign interference through social media.

Huh.

[–] phoneymouse 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Conservatives can never say another word about gEoRgE sOrOs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's what they do, they push stories of democrat boogie men to bury the story of their own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And yet they will because it muddies the waters

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

In the context of how much wealth eel on musk has, that falls squarely into the range of “petty cash”

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 7 points 2 weeks ago

Best democracy money can buy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Will be his best investment to date. Right up there with Twitter. He will make that back in spades. Can I say that? Ya know...because he's African? I don't want it to be taken as racist.