this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
465 points (98.9% liked)

tumblr

3480 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_ 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It would be really really awful if we started flooding the tip hotlines with false/conflicting information

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

You can flood it with names of people whose coverage was denied and call it motive. No false information needed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But that would be illegal!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Just go to any health forum, find random usernames complaining about the company and call it as a tip. Not wrong, just dumb

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I’m in another country. If I called in tips from Canada that are false is that still illegal?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, the FBI would likely know that it's coming from Canada and could get the RCMP involved.

This is only discussing the legality and not the ethics of it though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Man why do Americas problems always have to be Canada’s problems too? Like why does the FBI have to be MY problem, that’s your guys mess. :(

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

You say that while suggesting you would interfere in an investigation in the US.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cause the rich in every country want the gestapo to keep everyone in line everywhere, so they make sure the fascist enforcement arms can work together easily.

In this case you should be blaming your politicians and the RCMP, not the FBI. The FBI can't come to your country and do shit to you without your country's permission.

Remember that the rich do not have patriotism, or a sense of responsibility to society or their community. They are above all that. Until we bring them back down to earth. Or under it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Bring them down to earth. Or under it.” That’s a fantastic quote. Did you think of that yourself or is that from something?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the mind of yours truly. Sounded good while I was writing the post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Droggelbecher 3 points 1 week ago

Not passing moral judgment, but if you commit a crime in a country other than yours, that country's authorities will be after you. For a change, this isn't the US being the US

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

TYL: the US has always been everyone else's problem — and our own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Not discussing anything else, but you're talking about inserting yourself into the FBI's business, so of course they're going to insert themselves into yours too.

[–] Serinus 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, really. Don't encourage people to commit stupid crimes that could send them to prison.

I don't know the legality of feeding them useless, but true tips. This is your own risk.

I absolutely do know the legality of lying to the FBI. Don't do this. Don't encourage people to do this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus 2 points 1 week ago

There's nothing illegal about going to the lookalike contest today at 1.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Let's open the closet to see how many people are celebrating this CEO getting shot, surely it can't be that many"

The closet in question:

[–] jaybone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always die like three seconds into that dungeon. I think there’s a spell I have to cast, or something I don’t have yet.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Great use of a fireball/meteor swarm if you have it though.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

"We're not responsible, the algorithm did it."

We're not responsible, the bullet did it.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 45 points 1 week ago (5 children)

How in God's name could that be "bigotry"

[–] tburkhol 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An astonishing number of people can't distinguish "hatred based on target's intrinsic, immutable features" from "hatred based on target's opinions."

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Almost like there are a ton of bad-faith actors out there intentionally muddying the waters, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah that was autocorrect for some reason

[–] disguy_ovahea 10 points 1 week ago

It can possibly be seen as bigotry against the patients that have received denial of coverage, but even that is a stretch.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some fuckwits would actually argue this I guarantee it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's what they do.

[–] GabrielBell12fi 8 points 1 week ago

To be fair, the title might have been a tad more sarcastic than people might first think :)

[–] SkunkWorkz 1 points 1 week ago

Because greedy scumbag CEOs are a minority class?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hadn't heard that algorithmic health care decisions had been ruled illegal. If the company were doing that, couldn't they be considered a criminal enterprise?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Presumably they stopped doing it in those states, or it's being appealed or something.

Also possible they're just ignoring a court order, I suppose, but that seems unlikely

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They definitely made an exception for those states. The same thing happened with the announcement of that Blue Cross branch that was going to stop paying for anesthesia after an arbitrary time limit. They made an exception for Connecticut because they passed a law making it illegal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Given how businesses work they probably didn't stop doing it they probably just toned it down a little bit. Like instead of "deny 50% of coverage by default" they set it to like "deny 43%".

As long as it flies under the radar right?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only ruled illegal in a couple of states. And no, doing some illegal things doesn't make you (under the law) a criminal enterprise. That's a term used for operations whose fundamental business is crime, as opposed to just employing some illegal methods in the pursuit of legal activities.

(This is not, remotely, an argument against much, much stronger penalties for companies that do illegal shit. If the fine is less than the profit then its just a cost of doing business).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I knew it was a fantasy when I wrote it. I mean, obviously they pay more for lawyers than anything else.

Just amazing how far they can stretch the law without it snapping back on them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

... for operations whose fundamental business is crime

Oh, so, insurance companies are "criminal enterpriseS", plural. Gotcha.

[–] trolololol 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can do deeply unethical things that are legal, such as delay deny defend. If only insurance stopped there it would be a great improvement. It's more likely they cross the line of what's legal as long as there's a chance of profit, even when penalties apply.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

~~If the company were doing that,~~ couldn't they be considered a criminal enterprise?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was the guy having an aneurysm while writing this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Perhaps due the lack of medical care.