this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
32 points (76.7% liked)

Technology

59769 readers
3022 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inkrifle 3 points 5 hours ago

You should see the Gab echo chamber, it's absolutely horrifying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think having a marketplace full of alternatives helps prevent that kind of entrenchment somewhat. Here is my problem though, who decides what an echo chamber is? I like a good back and forth conversation, but hate bad faith arguments. If people talk stupid shit, how much tolerance should one reasonably expect?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

The problem isn't different opinions, or even radical ones, it's these opinions garnering more clicks and views, incentivizing them as a result.

The reddit model works well for discussions but the mod fiasco ruins everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Far right radicalization will get worse if progressives leave X. Conservatives will stick around simply because they aren't banned and then the white supremacists will be free to start pulling them without push back.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (4 children)

Nearly all social media is full of ~~eco~~ echo chambers.. I still post and follow stuff on several of the platforms. There is very little nuanced conversation.. Seems like it is more and more just an up vote or downvote storm, or people claiming one thing or another without any supporting evidence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Happy to see the word “nuance” being used… wish there was more of that too. This whole binary with-me / against-me mentality will bring us all crashing down.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

And that makes me genuinely sad. When I joined Lemmy, I was a little put off by the leftist bent here, but then I realized that I appreciated being challenged on my views, especially since people here are generally nice about it.

I wish I could find something like that for conservatives as well. Better yet, I wish there was a place like Reddit or Lemmy where all views were respected, provided claims are supported with evidence. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be compatible with the world we live in, and that makes me sad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like there aren't many centrist communities where you can have nuanced discussions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I honestly don't care about centrism, I care about diversity of ideas with citations for claims. If a left wing or right wing policy is the best for a given situation, I'd love to discuss it.

But failing that, I'll take centrist over either political extreme any day of the week.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You can probably post on 7.62x54r.ru. Reddit had a decent number of anti-establishment leftists who would join up with conservatives on shared issues. I haven't seen any spaces like that on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, and that's something I missed about Reddit. I found a few good communities of centrists, open minded leftists, and open minded conservatives, so I could generally join a pretty good discussion. I still needed to watch what I said, because there were some things even open minded people wouldn't consider given their political bias, but a lot of things were fair game.

For example, I could bring up Right to Repair to both groups, and I'd get different reasons for and against it from each group.

Here on Lemmy, I don't get that diversity, either something is compatible with the group's general leftist persuasion, or I get downvoted into oblivion. And that sucks, because I put in a lot of effort to be constructive and challenge the status quo. Fortunately, I usually know before making a statement which way it'll go, and there are no downsides (aside from worse engagement) to getting down votes, so I know what to expect. It does make me sad though.

I'll check out that community though. Not sure what to expect from a .ru domain though as an American...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 18 hours ago (15 children)

I don't know how it could get any worse than now. Basically we're all in echo chambers whichever platform you use. Including Lemmy.

Agreement with "consensus" of whatever bucket you're placed into is rewarded, and disagreement is punished. Even if only by upvote/downvote. Switching platforms won't change much.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Unpopular opinion: It's time to bring back church.

No algorithms controlling you; locally based and strengthens community; a broad spectrum of rich and poor meeting and being seen; opportunities to care and be cared about on a weekly basis; opportunities to develop social skills and to really make an impact in your community based on social missions like food banks and myriad activities. Plus, you meet people not because you want to change their minds, but because they're just there, trying to be better people. And then once in a while, good conversations turn into minds changed.

Context: I used to be Mormon and left because I no longer believed, but I now see a hell of a lot of good in church, as long as it isn't a control freak over your life and sense of self.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

It works because you've got people who share a potent, vast common ground — being Christians.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Many churches have a bible that the church want's you to believe without question. Which is known as faith. It is better to question everything.

[–] mPony 4 points 6 hours ago

Unpopular opinion Well you got that part right.

[–] DeadWorldWalking 6 points 14 hours ago

No social media site controlled by Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg is going to be a healthy experience. You will have much more varied content anywhere else.

[–] garretble 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I look at it this way: I don't let in the crazy person on the street screaming racist garbage into my house, so I also don't have to listen to or engage with that person on the internet, either. That doesn't make my house an "echo chamber."

For a long time I tried to treat "internet people" with some level of "respect" so to say. That is, I didn't spend time blocking people and whatnot. But now? Screw em. I don't have time to listen to nonsense, so if someone tries to come in to a conversation in bad faith, it's very easy to block and move on.

Or on short-form social media like Bsky or Masto or whatever if someone posts a racist thing. Or a bigoted thing. Block and move on.

Those trolls live off of engagement so just don't give it to them. And those same trolls are the ones complaining about "echo chambers." "Waaa, no one wants to listen to my racist nonsense. It's an echo chamber!" No, you are just a trash human, and no one is obligated to listen to you.

[–] Carrolade 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Those trolls live off of engagement

Not anymore. Back in the day trolling was a recreational activity done for fun. Deny the fun, cut off the troll's food. Now it's being done for political purposes, so cutting off the fun no longer functions since it no longer strikes at the primary motivation.

[–] garretble 8 points 16 hours ago

The result for the people who block them is still the same, though: they no longer see the troll garbage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

It decreases the spread. Cutting form the engagement means free people who aren't already subscribed to that content will see it, since there's fewer people arguing with it. Which means those who are susceptible to falling for it have less chance to even encounter it, meaning fewer fall into it.

Even if the incentive to create the trolls has changed, the counter to letting it spread hasn't.

[–] just_another_person 10 points 17 hours ago

Groups of any kind are echo chambers. That's why they exist.

[–] Juice260 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt that it can be any worse than tech companies with financial incentives doing it. Surrounding yourself with like minded people will surely cause some bubbles like that but since when is letting a targeted algorithm funneling us for ad revenue a better option? I don’t personally think it’s a big deal and guessing that people are just upset that their obsession with mass engagement is getting shook.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a valid claim, IMO. The libs leaving Twitter all seem to be VERY into Orwellian practices like “official block lists” and other absurd self-owns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I assure you that official blocklists are a very fringe viewpoint.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know that it'll affect the echo chamber effect; you create that through your subscriptions, and avoid it by browsing "all." What will be impacted is the amount of simply shit content, both from idiots and from bots. Moderators' jobs will get harder: the bots follow the people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] K1nsey6 6 points 18 hours ago

I've been on Bluesky very early on, and with the mass exodus of liberals from twitter, they are recreating their own toxic echo chambers on Bluesky now and it's bleeding through into every post they disagree with.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Well that's kind of baked-in to social media. If you'd otherwise talk to lots of different people in person, read much etc and now come to the internet and choose any of the mentioned platforms... That'd be bad. You're now in a smaller filter bubble. If you're already in some echo chamber and for example switch from mastodon to bluesky... that's a minor change. The situation is a bit different if you change from a nazi platform to a regular one. It's still not good. But better.

[–] AbouBenAdhem 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

One thing to bear in mind is that, whenever someone accustomed to one platform explores another, they’ll tend to ascribe any differences between the communities to the other platform being an echo chamber of some kind.

load more comments
view more: next ›