this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
614 points (98.1% liked)

News

23445 readers
4293 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary via ChatGPT

A Delaware judge invalidated Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay package for a second time, citing undue influence and unfair terms set by Musk. Despite shareholder approval earlier this year, the court ruled the process failed to address governance concerns and transparency. The judge emphasized the board's failure to prove the compensation plan's fairness, suggesting alternative, reasonable payment options were possible. Tesla may appeal the decision or propose a new compensation plan.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EnderMB 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To put this pay into perspective, you could take it and give everyone in the US that is living in poverty around $1400. It wouldn't necessarily save them from poverty, but such an amount would undoubtedly help over a million people in a dire situation.

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ah but they’ll just use it to buy drugs, or alcohol, or shelter, or food, or transportation when Elon musk will use it to buy something useful like another politician.

[–] P1nkman 12 points 23 hours ago

How un-Amercan if you, thinking about this stuff. /s

Anyway, I'm hungry, when do we eat?

[–] Botzo 58 points 1 day ago (14 children)

That would be more than the entire market cap of Ford. Or VW, Honda, BMW, Hyundai, Stellantis, etc.

Truly preposterous.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How much profit would Tesla have to make on each car they ever sold to finance his package?

[–] LANIK2000 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They actually do generate enough revenue in a year. Ignoring business expenses ofc. That would be the 15b figure below. Elon is quite literally asking for an amount that would be comparable to liquidating all of tesla, selling off every scrap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] 58008 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The replies on Twitter to Musk's legal team complaining about this decision are equal parts hilarious and day-ruining. People are really cheering for this man to get ~55 billion dollars. Like, it hurts their actual feelings that he's been denied such a payment, and they offer words of support to Musk like he's doing a life sentence and has been denied DNA testing that would prove his innocence by a capricious judge who built her political career on the initial murder trial.

I hope they're just bots. Bots expertly-programmed to annoy me specifically.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I can tell you first hand some are def real people. When I bring it up to this one friend they start to foam at the mouth and go on rants like they can't control themselves.

[–] psion1369 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost like these people read Ayn Rand and jerked off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All three it's called the hat trick

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I've been doing pool all wrong!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 147 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] _stranger_ 17 points 1 day ago

You might get a free horse out of it if you do.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why does he get to keep appealing if it's already been struck down twice? Fuck this guy.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Risk vs Reward.

A relatively small cost towards legal fees has a decent chance to yield a large payoff.

Musk is a warped gollum-man, but not an idiot by any means.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The man is one of the greatest idiots of this generation. There's just a bunch of really dumb impressionable people falling for his lies. Doesn't make him smart.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Different packages were struck down I think. The first he appealed and failed. So they approved another package this year and this is the result.

Imagine what $51 billion would do for the average Tesla employee if it were split up evenly amongst all employees. But yes, give this one guy more money than he can ever use in infinite lifetimes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We just need a general rule: no company may offer more in compensation to any person than one hundred times the value the company paid in compensation to its lowest paid worker.

Add in words and details to make sure there aren't any loopholes, of course, and the problem will be largely solved across the board.

[–] danc4498 6 points 1 day ago

I think even that would have issues. The fix is easy. Tax the holy fuck out of any earnings over $10 million. You can take that payment away from your company, but it will do very little to benefit you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

the 56b divvied up would be about 400k per employee (based on 2023 headcount from wiki). i think he's fired more than hired this year, so it'd be a bit more than that.

[–] danc4498 13 points 1 day ago

Life changing amounts of money. Instead he’s getting bragging rights to the 5 other people in the world like him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's a suspiciously close amount to the amount he borrowed to buy Twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i'll be tesla ceo for 0.1% (1/1000) of that. i couldn't possibly be worse than 1/1000th of an elon, or even 1/100th of one, so i'm the far better deal.

[–] Red_October 10 points 1 day ago

To be fair all you have to do is publicly announce that you're going to focus on improving build quality and not shitposting and you'd already be a better CEO.

[–] RedWeasel 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are millions of random internet users that could do a better job than him. And most if not all of them would be willing to work for 0.01% of that. The guy is successful in spite of himself at this point.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

line everybody up, take turns. ceo for five minutes then retire, collect $2.33 million paycheck, then the next guy is 'hired'.

[–] horse_battery_staple 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes the trillionaire will be punished with a 32 Billion pay package instead

[–] Buffalox 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh no, how will he manage?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drmoose 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some good news! I can't believe that Tesla shareholders approved this when all Tesla indicators essentially form a giant mount of downward facing red arrows at that time.

It's hard to believe that I was about to buy a Tesla just 8 years ago, and today I can not cringe when I see the brand. I hope someone does real market research on this, but the downfall of the company has been nothing short of fascinating.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tesla doesn't pay dividends so the shareholders (the majority of which are Elon sycophants) lose nothing from approving this bonus.

It's a meme stock, nothing more

[–] poo 33 points 1 day ago

May the next strike be with the guillotine 🙏

[–] Buffalox 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

However, McCormick in her latest ruling, wrote: "Even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here."

What, so the package the stockholders voted on was the original package already deemed illegal in court? And apparently because that deal was illegal, it can't be voted through by stockholders?

Am I getting this right? Because that seems incredibly stupid by the lawyers advising Trump and Tesla!

[–] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd 2 points 8 hours ago

They wouldn't have done it without Elon's direction, easy bill-able hours for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›