this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
139 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19119 readers
4936 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Not the dangerous radical gender ideology of trying to be happy

Is there any argument for trans people getting their rights removed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Setting aside the mind, it is a biological fact that approximately 1 in 1700 people are born with both sexual organs.

They're supposed to just, die?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

What seems like a rhetorical question to you does not to a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

According to Republicans, yes

[–] [email protected] 49 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is surely going to lower the price of eggs.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago

When women are factory farmed baby makers...oh you meant those eggs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

We need media stepping up the messaging that the Right is infatuated with the genitals of people, especially children. Outside of maybe your Dr. (and/or partner), nobody should be talking about, or caring about your genitals to the degree the Right is in this pervy/pedo crusade of late.

[–] Sam_Bass 3 points 8 hours ago

Well, said senator could find himself and his cohorts erased as well

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 34 points 13 hours ago

I kind of feel like all this spawned from some hot trans-girl turning down one of these shitstains and they've never let it go.

[–] kescusay 71 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Might as well define the Earth as flat and the Moon as green cheese while he's at it.

Do these fuckers have literally nothing else to do than wage wars against reality?

[–] lettruthout 35 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe a strategy to distract the masses while they and their ~~supporters~~ handlers steal the country blind.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think you mis-spelled "Likely".

[–] grue 3 points 11 hours ago

I know you misspelled "certainly."

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy 23 points 14 hours ago

We really need to start saying that these people want their own family members killed. It seems to be the only thing that can get some people to listen

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago

Wait, if they are erased, can they then become invisible superheroes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Man, I hope all the trans who said they wouldn't vote for Harris because she didn't talk about them are feeling great about the new government that will be in control during the next few years!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

@floofloof And this guy is an actual MD, as in medical doctor.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Aren't doctors supposed to take an oath to do no harm? This will cause so much harm.

[–] FlowVoid 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Technically, no. "Do no harm" was the motto of a 19th century French physician and later made its way into medical textbooks, but it is not found in the Hippocratic oath.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

It seems those exact words don't feature in the oath, but the pledge to do no harm is there, worded slightly differently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

~~Republican~~ lawmakers only swear an oath to whomever is paying them the most.

Edit: Democrats do it too, just not as obviously and not all of them. Until we get rid of corporate lobbying, we'll be firmly in an oligarchy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Dr Oz is a real doctor as well. Unfortunately medical school doesn't prevent people from being delusional. Or giant assholes for that matter

[–] RubberElectrons -5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

of course I hate the active reduction of freedom. But may I ask, how important is this? Will trans people be able to continue to survive? Existing and being who you believe you are seems to be the important detail which pisses then off. They can't do anything but be explicitly rude.

Should someone decide to fight you for being trans, I will fight for + with you.

Writing this comment mildly drunk, I'm sure there's problems with it, but what if it's like rain off a window, you look at it and ignore it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a precursor to them trying to sue trans people for "fraud" by having documents with the correct gender marker. Also, the cruelty is the point, and this is in itself cruel.

[–] RubberElectrons 2 points 6 hours ago

Cripes. The fuckin struggle just to survive never ends. I don't get what people's problem is, and at this point an convinced I never will. Fuck em.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They can also force transgender people in institutional settings (prison, college, military, etc) to be housed with the wrong gender. That can be dangerous.

[–] RubberElectrons 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah for sure. I understand. I wish people could just be.