this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
542 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

28410 readers
1064 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaster_M 12 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

is no one calling it the X-odus and why?

[–] ByteMe 3 points 4 hours ago

I mean Elon missed the opportunity too. He could have cold Twitter spaces to spacesX but nope

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Most of the exodus where coming from iOS ecosystem, mostly Americans ig. Nonetheless, the destruction of Xitter will give fediverse the momentum to grow. Achieving 800k active users is wild (tho i do notice some spams too, which I wish there'll be easier tool sets to deal with them). Now, let's see which approach of social media will win in the long run: the Bluesky or Mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The fediverse will have the same growths as most foss. It will start slow and continue to grow slowly forever. It will always be a bit behind the cutting edge but it will never get worse only get better. Its like evolution it gets forked the best fork wins the reat die repeat.

Every enshitification cycle we will gain a few people and once we have them we have they stay a lot longer than most other platforms. We will not win through mass adoption but through a long slow a painfull proccess of gradual accumulation.

And at some point it will become dominant eg blender, a bunch of standards, and linux in the server space. The tech companies live on the edge forever trying to outrun the snail that will kill them instantly when it touches them. Foss is coming it cannot be stopped it will find them and it will kill them

[–] Masta_Chief 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

*if we can fund it

I'm probably going to start donating $5 a month to the Lemmy devs (or whomever is the best to donate to) Vote with your wallet people!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I would reccommend donating to ur instances over the devs. The instances have ongoing costs that if not paid will shut down the fediverse far quicker than a slowed development cycle

[–] Masta_Chief 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ty I figured someone would point me in the right direction. On an aside, absolutely no one irl I've talked to has ever heard of Lemmy or the fediverse which is disappointing. I wonder how we get fediverse stuff to grow

[–] [email protected] 2 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

The .world instance is very well funded - they take more money than they spend. Not profit since they're a nonprofit, they save it as well as give to others. Meanwhile the Lemmy developers still don't have proper full time funding. This information is public. If I were you I'd subscribe to fund the developers for now. Lemmy.ca is also well funded.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago

I love the Fediverse and see it as the only reasonable choice. Everywhere else you must eat shit and like it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The fediverse needs to outlast BlueSky, so that when its VC backers call time and demand a profitable exit (i.e. enshittification), there’ll still be a fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

What makes you think VC won't have another product in the pipeline to take over from most users exiting BlueSky? Just like they had BS ready to scoop up most of the Xodus.

Not a critique really, the Fediverse will still be there and will get some people every time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

It will outlast bs. Mastodon has been around for many years now. It already outlasted Google+, which was bigger and had more funding. And since it has a broad base of support it's unlikely that it will all just fall apart. Unlike the commercial social networks, no single person can pull the plug the fediverse. (Lemmy is younger, but it also seems very strong right now. I just hope lemmy still gets some exposure on the outside now that the major drama at reddit has died down.)

[–] [email protected] 89 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

"...and does not depend on venture capital to survive,” wrote Rochko, subtly jabbing at one of Bluesky’s potential weaknesses with that last bit.

it wasn't a subtle jab, it's the primary reason everything else has gone to shit. it is the MAIN selling point of the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Bluesky plans to generate revenue via subscriptions at some later point and by providing other paid services, like access to custom domains.

This looks like a very important point. I doubt we'll see true federation with "access to custom domains".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Its so blatantly obvious that bluesky is already looking for ways to make profit. The enshittification cycles are getting shorter and shorter. Soon they will try to travel back in time to create even more shit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

From what I can gather, they aren’t selling the ability to link custom domains as your user handle. They are acting as a domain registrar to allow users to buy domains and link them to their handle in one step, then likely skimming some profits off the top. Imagine they sell a “custom username with domain” for $20 per year, they pay the wholesale fee (around $9 for a .com) and pocket the rest. That seems perfectly reasonable to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Ah yes "perfectly reasonable" to give away control over your supposedly freely federated service to some profit motivated company. Toddler ass logic. They can revoke that right at any moment for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

it is the MAIN selling point of the fediverse.

Debatable, I would say it's the ability to selfhost and not be under the mercy of "the platform" or the admin's subjective morals, you can also not federate and make the place your own

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

do you think any of that could happen if it was beholden to capital?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Not necessarily, it all depends on the software license, people don't usually care about who funds their software, ( even if they're funding it themselves with their data ), plus If we're talking about selling points, saying that you can control your online presence is a much successful sell than saying it's not VC funded, like I never used that argument when I try to convince my friends to hop on Mastodon

Edit: but I'm not saying it's not a valid argument, it's very valid

[–] Lost_My_Mind 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I wouldn't say it's the main selling point. Because if it is, there is no selling point.

The fediverse is a series of social networks. Social networks rely on being SOCIAL. So in order to have a healthy social network you need a large number of people. The more people, the better the platform. It's that easy.

The current audience for Lemmy/Fediverse is a niche group. This group highly prefers linux. It cares (and knows about) federation. It cares about adblocking. It highly prefers political discussions. It cares about privacy.

As for the majority of the country? They don't give a shit. About any of that. At all.

Linux is a platform that if you based user numbers on features, it SHOULD be the number one operating system. It's not. It's not even close. I'll put it this way. The Dallas Cowboys play in a stadium that can fill 100,000 people. If you filled a sellout crowd for an event, the ticketing ushers would outnumber the linux users in that building.

And the reason for this, is the average American does not give one shit if something has enshitification. Or even notice enshitification. That's the reason products keep shrinkings, ads keep appearing. If people stopped using the products, they would stop doing that. It's only profitable because people don't care.

So if the major selling point is "we don't have corporate enshitification", and the majority of people don't even know what that means, then it's not a selling point is it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

The current audience for Lemmy/Fediverse is a niche group.

A niche group who is here because capital destroyed other platforms we loved.

I don't think my statement is untrue but I also don't think it will remain true for much longer for exactly the reasons you put forward.

edit: @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

The more people, the better the platform. It’s that easy.

Hard disagree, quality matters as much or perhaps more than quantity. A billion Nazi network is still Nazi, see Xitter for instance.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Even if Mastodon and other Fediverse platform gains are 1% of the gains of BlueSky or anything else, it's still cause for celebration and to welcome new friendly faces with open arms.

When the Reddit API-calypse happened, I don’t think anyone expected Lemmy to have more users than Reddit or anywhere even close to a similar number. But Lemmy.ca went from around 40 active users in April 2023 to hundreds, and then to 2k over 3 months, most people being friendly and ready for something different.

Quantity isn't everything. There is an innumerable amount of things that could be better about Mastodon, Lemmy and other Fediverse software and sure, mass-adoption could help with niche content. However the way the Fediverse is set up, it is resistant to all the sacrifices other platforms had to make in the long run to be more profitable. Musk-boi could "buy" Mastodon, Spez could "buy" Lemmy.world and ml, and Zucker-bot could "buy" Pixelfed tomorrow, but that wouldn't stop anyone from forking those platforms and leaving the main instances. The distributed nature makes it hard for a monopolist to capture.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Quantity isn't everything

That right there hits the nail on the head. There is a certain critical mass, an activity level that makes satisfy most discussion needs for most users. It's a tiny fraction of the total traffic of a place like Reddit or Twitter.
But if we have that, and keep the quality level up, we can succeed.

Success to me doesn't mean killing Reddit and Twitter. It means creating a place where smart people can come and find enough content and discussion that they don't need Reddit and Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Musk-boi could “buy” Mastodon, Spez could buy Lemmy.world and ml, and Zucker-bot could “buy” Pixelfed tomorrow, but that wouldn’t stop anyone from forking those platforms and leaving the main instances.

Or going someplace in the Fediverse that's neither Mastodon nor Lemmy nor Pixelfed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

People just very badly want to not know about other fediverse platforms for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Reason #1: It overloads them mentally. It was hard enough to wrap their minds around Mastodon not being the one website they thought it is.

Reason #2: They got so used to their nice and cosy and fluffy and friendly woolly mammoth being the entire Fediverse, and everything they ever interact with being Mastodon, that everything they (might) have to interact with that is not Mastodon is too much of a disturbance. There being something else in the Fediverse other than Mastodon simply feels too wrong.

[–] Today 14 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I thought the name x was stupid, but now I love the idea of eXodus. If I were starting a site, that's what I would call it.

[–] Gigasser 2 points 4 hours ago

Quick! Create an instance called Lemmy.eXodus!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Right?

It's so obvious. Journalism today, sheesh.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I’m a bit late on this one, why’s there been another exodus?

[–] someguy3 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

X is full of white supremacists.

[–] TrickDacy 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Has been for over a decade

[–] someguy3 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe I should say it's reached a real tipping point.

[–] TrickDacy 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah, that makes sense

[–] Zombiepirate 9 points 16 hours ago

From Wikipedia:

In November 2024, following Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 United States presidential election and Elon Musk's nomination as a co-executive of the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, Bluesky experienced a surge in new user registrations as people migrated from other social platforms, particularly Twitter. Many came from the United States, United Kingdom (where Bluesky had previously seen growth during the 2024 UK riots following Musk's commentary), and Canada. The social app added over 4 million registered users in that week, becoming the most popular app in the US App Store and Play Store.

[–] savant 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think I saw two or three "exodus from Twitter", every time most of the users go back after two weeks or so.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Most definitely go back, but some stay, and those who do stay, cause a growth over time. The activity stays somewhat elevated and never goes back to exactly where it was. It's always just a little bit higher.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of like Elvis's colon. He expelled MOST of the fecies everyday, but some stayed permanently, until he died on the toilet with 25lbs of fecies inside him that never came out.

I guess in this example, I'm saying that people are shit

[–] stackPeek 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry but what the fuck is that analogy

[–] Lost_My_Mind 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm not a fan of humans.