this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
212 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Most tipped workers already don't pay federal taxes.
  • Increasing the tipped minimum would do more.

Edit: really there should be no minimum lower than the hourly minimum.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Just pay your staff a livable wage and get rid of tipping entirely.

[–] themeatbridge 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The investor class has convinced many tipped workers that they will make less money if they receive a living wage. People dream of that big Saturday night rush where they go home with $1,000 in cash, while forgetting the far more common experience of struggling to pay bills because some cheapskate stiffed you on your only big table for the night.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Don't forget that workers like tips because tips allow you to cheat on your taxes. I've never met anybody who worked in a tipped job who reported 100% of the tips they received.

Another issue is that everybody thinks they're above average. Waiters / waitresses think that if there are no more tips, they (being above average) will lose out.

[–] ProIsh 15 points 2 weeks ago

Perfect comment. This is me upvotting twice

[–] cm0002 13 points 2 weeks ago

BuT tHaT woULD KiLL SmALl TiME ResTAuRAnts

[–] orclev 4 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, what if instead of removing taxes from tips they make the tax rate on tips 100%? It would effectively eliminate tips as a source of income forcing companies to pay competitive wages without factoring tips in. Also if people knew 100% of their tips were going to the government they'd stop tipping pretty much overnight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

But also tax the rich proportionally to their wealth, not just their taxable income and redistribute it to the poor.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Abolish tipping. Make "gratuity" transactions illegal under IRS code so that the only way to "tip" is in cash. Overnight, the tipped staff will quit and the owners will be forced to pay a proper wage if they want to hire anyone.

Sometimes my company manages a project so well that we hit a performance bonus. I split that bonus amongst the members of that specific team, including prior contributors. I do not lower their salaries by twenty percent and expect the client's bonus to offset the lower salary. If that would be craY for me to do, why isn't it for restaurants.?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

If you’re forcing people to quit then the execution is always not feasible. Most of these people are already struggling.

[–] AA5B 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you’re in Massachusetts, consider voting for Question 5 to end the separate tipping minimum wage. It’s a good first step

[–] Brokkr 12 points 2 weeks ago

Specifically voting yes on that question.

You may have seen many restaurants putting out signs saying to vote no. That was done by management and front of house staff because they don't want to pay their employees at the minimum wage and they don't want to share their tips with back of the house staff (who also deserve the tips as much as FOH).

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

"Increasing the tipped minimum would do more."

n-n-n-NOPE.

paying workers a livable wage is the real answer.

as every other country with a livable minimum wage can attest to.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tipping is a way for businesses to have the public subsidize not paying their employees enough. It has the added benefit of seeming like it is "pro-worker", in that saying we need to get rid of tipping tends to be unpopular with those relying on tips.

But if the worker was making a living wage to begin with, they wouldn't need the tips to survive. This highlights the problem: the money the business owner keeps to buy the new yacht is the same money that should be going to the worker, but instead, the worker gets the chance of the public subsidizing their wages while the business owner simply pockets more.

If tipping were outlawed tomorrow, many businesses would go under because they actually don't have business models that support paying a living wage. This is the real problem, but it is very, very hard to fix since tipping is so socially accepted now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's not some kind of sneaky thing where if workers are paid with tips the customers pay more. When workers are paid in normal wages instead of tips, the prices are just higher.

The problem is that many tipped workers love tips because most of the time they can avoid reporting all of them, so they pay less in taxes. Employers like them because it can make their prices seem lower because the price on something like the menu isn't actually the final price someone pays. The people who hate tips are the customers who can never be sure what the final bill will be, and who often have to "tip" a minimum of 10%, often in advance, for service that isn't tip-worthy.

It's ridiculous to pretend that businesses don't have business models that support paying a living wage, or that without tips they'd go out of business. The only difference is that they can list lower prices knowing that the final bill will include a tip. If tips were eliminated they'd just have to list the items with a slightly higher price. The customers also know that that tip is going to be included. Other than European tourists, nobody goes into a restaurant and thinks that the final bill will merely be the cost of the food they ordered. They know they'll be expected to pay a tip too. Getting rid of tipping would just mean that the tip would be $0, and the food would be a bit more expensive.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

The real problem is billionaires no longer pay taxes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

But it does solve the real problem of rich people not having another way to avoid paying taxes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Older I get, the more carving out exceptions leads to more corruption and cheating.

Good article.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Amerika seriously needs to stop tipping outright. It's out of hand, ridiculous, and is only going further out of control.

Tipping went from 10% to wait staff, to 20% and showing up everywhere. 10% was good when a meal cost $5. How the hell did it go to 20% when the meal is now $15? The percentage amount already means it keeps up with inflation.

[–] Darkonion 6 points 2 weeks ago

Someone more eloquent and knowledgeable then me made an argument about how the 'no taxes on tips' was going to be step one and then 'no limits' on tips would be step two which would lead to some unholy abomination of tax evasion for the already insanely rich. I don't remember where I saw that, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Get rid of tipping. Pay your workers!

[–] Bosht 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not an expert and I can plainly see that as well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just because Ted Cruz introduced the bill and Trump endorsed it doesn't make not taxing tips a bad idea. Remember, Harris endorsed it too.

[–] bostonbananarama 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It being a bad idea makes it a bad idea though. Why would this source of income be exempt from taxation? Why is that a good idea? Why is a salaried or hourly employee less deserving of having their income exempted?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why should it be taxed? Not "Why it shouldn't".

Imo, income tax should only affect the rich, and they aren't working tipped jobs.

[–] bostonbananarama 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why should it be taxed? Not "Why it shouldn't".

Because income is taxed. We have a progressive tax system, so the first small amount is untaxed, the next is taxed at a low rate, the next is taxed at a slightly higher rate, and so on through the tax brackets.

You're now saying that salary and hourly employees wages should be taxed, but not tipped income. So my question remains, why shouldn't it be taxed? Why create an inequity between different sources of income.

Imo, income tax should only affect the rich, and they aren't working tipped jobs.

Not taxing tipped income doesn't achieve your stated goal. The majority of low and middle income wage earners are still taxed. Altering the tax brackets would be more fair, and come closer to achieving your stated goal. Exempting tips remains a terrible idea.

[–] GroundedGator 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just because Harris endorsed it doesn't make it a good idea.