this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
168 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon 233 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Washington Post: Refuses to endorse a candidate in order to appease Trump.

Also Washington Post: Gets sued anyway for not appeasing Trump enough.

How's that non-endorsement working out for you, Bezos?

[–] EmpathicVagrant 122 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless it’s a scheme to just pay him ‘settlement’ instead of donations

[–] SpaceNoodle 56 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Sanctus 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a preview for them of what's to come when all their billionaire strong arming gets him elected. They will grovel and meet the pavement anyway.

[–] CitizenKong 17 points 2 weeks ago

See also: Russian oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From the CNBC article that is the source for the linked post:

Trump’s suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas, effectively guaranteeing that it would be assigned to Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump nominee with a conservative judicial record.

That gives Trump a much better chance of winning than you'd think from only reading the Political Wire post.

[–] Nightwingdragon 52 points 2 weeks ago

There's zero chance this would win. It would effectively bring an end to a free and independent pre......oh........

But even if he does win, there's no way the Supreme Court would upho........oh.......

I guess we can throw "free press" on the growing pile of things in the Constitution that the courts write off as "unenforceable".

Remember when the Constitution was a sacred document of the rights of the People instead of just a list of ideas that can be ignored at will when they become inconvenient? Pepprige farm remembers.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

This. Pretty much everyone with a legal degree thinks this case is junk and should be mocked (as per the CNBC article). Alas, it's filled in the one court that would say otherwise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_shopping at it's lowest...

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t worry, appeasement always works out against these guys.

[–] espentan 33 points 2 weeks ago

Yeap, that always work a treat. Good thing we let that Hitler fellow annex Austria, otherwise there might've been trouble.

[–] expatriado 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

sueing for not buying ads on X, for not endorsing you... i see a pattern with these people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump’s suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas, effectively guaranteeing that it would be assigned to Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump nominee with a conservative judicial record.

Elon Musk changes X terms to steer lawsuits to his favorite Texas court

[–] AA5B 4 points 1 week ago

Don’t worry, I’m sure that judge will recognize the impropriety and recuse himself, right? …… right?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Here we go again with this absolutely fucking insane hypocrisy.... JFC...

What the actual fuck? Fox news anyone??? Hello??? No? OANN? No? Newsmax?? No?? Their bread and butter is all pro Trump all negative on Democrats ffs... God I hate these people...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

of all the places he could try to sue, he picks THEM? like, dude...they pretty much catered to him by blocking the harris endorsement entirely. still not satisfied!

[–] eran_morad 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

fragile pussy bitch. i hope harris wins so that he suffers the narcissistic injury of having lost to a black woman.

[–] Nightwingdragon 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Saying he lost to a black woman still gives off an incorrect implication that she's somehow beneath him.

He's a fragile pussy bitch and if he loses it's because he's a fragile pussy bitch and he'll know that everybody thinks of him as a fragile pussy bitch except for the people he pays to tell him he isn't a fragile pussy bitch.

And remember. We all know the truth about ourselves. That little voice deep, deep down inside that you can't ignore forever. And while he will never, ever, ever admit it publicly, I take solace knowing that he goes to bed every night with that voice telling him that he's a fragile pussy bitch who paid for a trophy wife and still can't get any. Because he's a fragile pussy bitch.

[–] eran_morad 12 points 2 weeks ago

that inferiority only exists in the minds of people like trump. may they suffer the humiliation they bring on themselves.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 12 points 1 week ago

Lol he's punishing the paper that bent to his will. Nazi shit.

This is why getting along and being civil don't apply to nazis. They play that card to get you to do what they want, then kill you for it, then demand everybody else be civil about them having done it. Rinse, repeat.

In populations where enough people's dicks don't work, this method is effective.

[–] Snapz 11 points 1 week ago

Bezos likely wants this and was likely part of the quid pro quo for optics. Nothing will come of trump lawsuit (because nothing ever does) but sends the temporary signal, for a brief press moment, that they are somehow adversaries. WaPo is another media outlet captured by another billionaire (same as twitter, facebook, fox, new york post, wall street journal, Sinclair owned local news stations, oann and all those recent pretend online "channels" that routinely host pillow salesmen as political experts) and needs that context considered when reading any of its content.

Bezos carries this shame for the rest of his hollow life. Anticipatory obedience, same as many gave to the nazis in lead up to the holocaust.

[–] snekerpimp 9 points 2 weeks ago

“I’m an asshole, and I am going to sue you for reporting that I am an asshole”

???

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

“Illegal Corporate In-Kind Contributions”

wat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This article was bad. Better to use the article it was referencing here

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The Republican’s campaign on Thursday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing The Washington Post of making “Illegal Corporate In-Kind Contributions” to Harris.

The campaign based its accusation on a Semafor report which said that the Post, as part of a ramped-up paid advertising campaign on social media, highlighted numerous articles critical of Trump versus more neutral coverage of the Democratic nominee.

The FEC complaint alleges that Semafor’s report indicates that the Post “is conducting a dark money corporate campaign in opposition to President Donald J. Trump.”

Adolf Hitler comes back from the dead, sues media outlets in zombie court for calling him "literally Hitler"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta love all these boogeyman terms that maga falls for like “dark money” and “deep state”. Hell, even Antifa fits the bill in my mind.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That sounds like some deep state antifa talk. You probably use dark money to build your space lasers! QUIT SENDING HURRICANES THAT WON'T HURT ANYONE TO KILL EVERYONE WHERE CLIMATE CHANGE ISN'T REAL!!!

If you listen to their emotion instead of their words, it starts to make a lot more sense. Kinda like watching your Sims have a conversation and then randomly kiss or slap each other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The maga crowd is very much an emotional support circle jerk.

[–] negativenull 1 points 2 weeks ago

Harris Campaign sues Fox News in 3...2...1...

[–] acosmichippo 6 points 2 weeks ago

I thought we already agreed that money is free speech. but by all means, lets get that overturned and abolish all PACs while we're at it.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 2 weeks ago

Political Wire - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Political Wire:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://politicalwire.com/2024/11/01/trump-takes-legal-action-against-the-washington-post/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support