this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024

-16 points (28.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6294 readers

370 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-16

Lemmy needs a feature that enables the blocking of every user up-/downvoting a certain comment/thread. (lemm.ee)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/unpopularopinion

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Every day, I see absolutely moronic comments getting upvoted while perfectly reasonable takes are downvoted. This would be a great opportunity to curate your feed by blocking these users en masse. Active curation like this is the only way to make social media even half-tolerable.

Whether you use it to filter out toxic users or to build an echo chamber, I think everyone should be free to do so. No one should be forced to share space with people they feel bring no value to the discussion - or, worse, make it more toxic.

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Upvoted as unpopular, per the rules of the community.

I don't think this would be an even remotely good feature.

You never know why someone specific up/downvoted a piece of content¹; at most you can pull up some possible explanations, but if you treat any as certain you're just assuming². As such you'll be blocking a lot of people based on things that you don't even disagree with.

not even when the person announces why they're up/downvoting something, like I did.
treating something uncertain as if it was true. The bane of social media.

[–] rustyfish 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

At least you postet this in the right community.

I assume you aren’t trolling, so here is what will happen when implemented: After about two weeks you will have blocked everyone who isn’t you, your alt accounts or a bot.

“Creating an echo chamber” is said a lot when people talk about blocking, banning and defederating. Sometimes it is justified, sometimes it’s utter bullshit. What you suggest, blocking people because you don’t like how they vote, is beyond bonkers. And I say this as someone who at times can be quite trigger happy with the block feature.

PS: “Everyone but me is a moron” is the mark of the moron.

[–] Mellow12 2 points 3 days ago

“Everyone but me is a moron” is the mark of the moron.

I’ve heard it phrased: “If you’re surrounded by assholes. Maybe you’re the asshole.”

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago

Sounds like projection...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

After about two weeks you will have blocked everyone who isn’t you, your alt accounts or a bot.

Why is this an issue for you?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's an issue for society.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...because if you stop listening to other opinions you end up in a divided society that has no way of healing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What about Lemmy instances defederating others? We not hearing from people on Twitter, Threads, Facebook, Truth Social and Gap either, and what about the block feature in itself? If what I'm asking is 'issue for society,' then are these not?

I don't think anyone is in the position to dictate what everyone's social media feeds should consist of. If someone wants to make them a perfect information bubble, devoid of different opinions, then let them. That's of no harm to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Nobody is saying to you that blocking shouldn't be available. They are saying to you that blocking large numbers of people to create a bubble is harmful to you and the wider community.

Hence blocking people who agree with a certain post is going too far. The action is too heavy handed for the "crime". It would be a harmful feature. It's"shooting people in the head for laughing at an edgy joke" levels of heavy handedness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

My blocklist is already over 500 users long. I don't block people for disagreeing with me. The bubble I'm building for myself is a bubble free from unreasonable assholes.

However, you didn't really answer my question. Blocking an entire instance is already a feature. That's way more 'heavy handed' than what I'm suggesting.

[–] Eheran 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why are you in a online community if you want to be alone?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s right in his manifesto. He’s being FORCED to share space with all us undesirables.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Filthy casuals

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago

Why do you assume I want to be alone?

[–] JubilantJaguar 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Blocking this, banning that. The result will be a bunch of filter bubbles where people only see what confirms and validates their own prejudices. Echo chambers, as you call them. I agree that this is a better scenario than a cesspool of cynicism and hate and negativity, but surely we can do better.

If the objective is incentivizing good behavior, here's another idea: reward upvoting and make it costly to downvote. Details TBD but other forums have done it and it works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

If the objective is incentivizing good behavior, here’s another idea: reward upvoting and make it costly to downvote. Details TBD but other forums have done it and it works.

A simple way is to make downvotes "cost" more clicks. For example:

if you want to upvote someone, you click the arrow up button and you're done.
if you want to downvote someone, you click the arrow down button, then a pop-up confirming it.

It isn't too much of a deal if you downvote people sparingly, but if you're consistently downvoting others it would get annoying.

Additionally, PieFed has a feature in line with your idea: up/downvoting people gives you "attitude", and if your attitude is too low (too many downvotes in comparison with upvotes), a warning mark appears near your username. Mods can also use this as a piece of info to decide how to handle you, as users who are consistently downvoting others are typically combative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I can already block entire instances along with every single user there. I don't see why I should care if that's what someone wants to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

OK but there are people you just don't want to see and that shouldn't be able to bother you. Just because you project what you would do on others doesn't mean that others will do that. The current block on Lemmy is just a hide feature, every other social media has a working block feature.

A echo chamber comes when toxic assholes can troll normal people out of Lemmy, wich is the current state of matter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

We got 50k users and every other day we have people bitching how they need more blocking features.

I want to post shit publicly but also chose and pick who can see and not see what i posted and who cant and cant react to my shit posts.

Main character syndrome?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

[meta] that's it. i'm confused again if i should upvote or downvote in this community. upvoting gives op just more visibility for their shenanigans. so now i'll just block the whole stupid community. i'm sick of every day being opposite day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think it just needs to make a actually working block feature where a blocked person doesn't see your content anymore and isn't allowed to comment/vote on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not necessarily against that either but personally I couldn't care less if a blocked person can see my posts and comments. There's even one commenting on this thread. What I use the feature for is to get them out of my sight. If they want to write me angry comments that I'll never see, then have at it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

personally couldn't care less if a blocked person can see my posts and comments.

There's even one commenting on this thread. What use the feature for is to get them out of my sight.

Contradiction to the statement before

If they want to write me angry comments that never see, then have at it.

No, when someone is blocked the person shouldn't be able to spread shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Contradiction to the statement before

How so?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You say you don't care and yet you know about it and say it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well yeah, I can see that the thread has received more replies than what I'm seeing.

Also, even if I did see their comments, I don't see how it contradicts my statement about how I don't care if they see mine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Good point

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You can use Mbin to see upvotes